Reddit reviews Dyson V7 Animal Pro+ Cordless Vacuum Cleaner-Extra Tools for Homes with Pets, Rechargeable, Lightweight, Powerful Suction, V7 Animal Pro +, Blue
We found 2 Reddit comments about Dyson V7 Animal Pro+ Cordless Vacuum Cleaner-Extra Tools for Homes with Pets, Rechargeable, Lightweight, Powerful Suction, V7 Animal Pro +, Blue. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Cord free, hassle free, powerful suction for versatile cleaningThe V7 Animalpro+ includes dollar 60 worth of extra tools for whole home cleaning. Includes flexi crevice tool, mini motorized tool, stubborn dirt brush, combination tool, crevice tool, direct drive cleaner head, and docking stationUp to 30 minutes fade free power; Actual runtime will vary based on power mode and/or attachments usedQuickly converts to a handheld for quick clean ups, spot cleaning and cleaning difficult places; Balanced for cleaning up top, down below and in betweenThe direct drive cleaner head drives bristles deeper into the carpet to remove ground in dirt; It has 75 percent more brush bar power than the Dyson V6 cord free vacuumMini motorized tool tackles hair and ground in dirt on upholstery and in tight spacesHygienic dirt ejector empties dust from the bin in a single action; Length: 1243 millimeterConvenient docking station stores and charges the machine, and holds additional attachments; So it's always ready to goMax power mode provides 6 minutes of higher suction for more difficult tasks
I wouldn't mind a fancy vacuum
> As someone who has reached endgame in the mechanical keyboard hobby
Pics or it didn't happen ;)
Alright, I haven't tested out a whole lot of headphones. Really not many at all. That being said, it is tough to do research, but I feel as though I've done quite a bit and found a very good 'bang for your buck' setup.
I have the Monoprice M1060, the Schiit Modi, and the Schiit Vali.
If you will be bringing this around with you, I would change the Vali with the Magni. You might also want to change those open back headphones for their closed counterpart.
I'm not sure if you're familiar with Monoprice, but the jist of their brand is that they copy designs that other companies make. Here is a 'Roomba' that they make. It looks and works exactly the same as a Roomba, but costs less. Here is a 'Dyson' that they make. Once again, it looks the same and probably works the same, for a fraction of the price. Here is a 3D printer that is just a replica (rebadged?) Malyan M300 (which retails at $200 I think).
Anyways, they just make the same stuff as other brands, but cheaper.
Now, look at the M1060 from Monoprice, and look at the Audeze LCD 2. It is very clear to me that Monoprice ripped off that design, but made it for $250 instead of $1000.
Here is a comparison of the two on head-fi. I'll grab a few quotes from the review in case you don't want to read it. It was the first link that showed up on google when I searched "m1060 vs lcd 2".
> Comfort: This one's pretty subjective. For me, the LCD's headband fits nicely over my large head and I have no issues. Both headphones are incredibly heavy, but it's due to the materials they are built with, and I see that as a good thing. I can wear both headphones for hours on end, although I will say that overall, the M1060's are more comfortable.
> SQ wise, the Audeze's win...... But let's go back to the "baby LCD" question on the M1060's. At their given price, the M1060's are a strong performer. Most of the sound characteristics are reminiscent of the LCD-2. I'd say it's less refined (and it is the truth) with the bass being more uncontrolled and most tracks sounding "crowded". The LCD-2 gives the track more room to breathe and really squeezes every ounce out of a well recorded track. With that being said, the M1060's are about 80-85% of the LCD-2's (to my ears) at well under 1/3 the price when new.
> If you have the means, and are looking for a set of warm, open backed cans, the Audeze's are a fantastic choice. However, if you are more budget oriented, the M1060's are a wonderful, cost effective option to the LCD-2.
Let's move on. Joshua Valour made a fantastic comparison video. He is a pretty well respected headphone reviewer, and I personally trust everything he says about them.
I'm watching it now, so I'll just grab some quotes from the video so you don't have to do it. (They won't be word for word unless they have "quotes" around them.)
> The M1060 have a good midrange and high end, but don't have the bass extension that the Audezies(idk how to spell that) do.
> The LCDs have a bit of a treble dip that keeps them less fatiguing.
> The LCDs feel a bit duller while the M1060s are sharper
> Vocals sound good on the M1060 but feel a bit more filled out with the LCDs
> "I am going to give an 'openness factor' to the 1060s "
> The 1060 has a wider soundstage, but the LCDs have better imaging because of the smaller soundstage
> Conclusion: the M1060 is thinner, wider, and crisper. The LCDs are warm, enjoyable, and narrow.
> "The LCD is a better performing headphone in more categores, but I don't know if it's a 3x better headphone"
> "I would say that the 1060s to my preference sound like a more expensive headphone than they are"
Anyways, the fact that he even made this video makes me think that he thinks that they're close enough to be comparable. The fact that he doesn't think the LCDs (which are known for being very good headphones) aren't worth 3x the price is also very impressive for the M1060s.
Alright, so that's good enough in my opinion. I think you got the idea. I think that the M1060 or M1060c would be a very good headphone for the money.
Now, why did I get the Schiit stack? Well, I like the way it looks, especially with that tube. It actually matches the M1060s well, because he mentioned they were a bit thin, and I imagine the tube fills it out a bit more. But I'm not 100% certain.
Hope this helps!
Edit: I'd like to point out that there have been a few revisions of the M1060s, so if you see stuff talking about bad build quality or whatever, that has all been taken care of.