Reddit Reddit reviews No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State

We found 6 Reddit comments about No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Computers & Technology
Books
Networking & Cloud Computing
Internet & Telecommunications
No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State
No Place to Hide Edward Snowden the NSA and the U S Surveillance State
Check price on Amazon

6 Reddit comments about No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State:

u/developanew · 16 pointsr/GoldandBlack

One of the journalists who helped break the Snowden leaks, Glenn Greenwald, has a great book on the topic titled No Place to Hide. I am not aware of any factual inaccuracies contained within.

https://www.amazon.com/No-Place-Hide-Snowden-Surveillance/dp/1250062586/

Maybe I'm just ill-informed, but I've honestly never seen a coherent argument for why the leaks were detrimental to US service members or national security.

u/phars · 7 pointsr/booksuggestions

No Place to Hide is an awesome read and probably a good start.

u/eking85 · 7 pointsr/IAmA

Glenn Greenwald wrote a book about Snowden that might be worth checking out.

u/gmroybal · 2 pointsr/Intelligence

He didn't officially work the government? Do you have a source for that? Because he was in the US Army, then an employee of the CIA, before becoming a civilian contractor. Sources are as follows:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7


Additionally, even Russia has admitted that he was an agent under their control. Although his original intention may have been noble, it is an utter impossibility that he would be granted a visa, despite the high-profile manhunt, unless he agreed to concessions and, at the very least, a thorough debrief with FSB officials.

Source:
1

u/Horgh · 1 pointr/france

> le média de Greenwald a des abonnés payants ?

edit: apparemment j'ai dit de la merde, mea culpa.

Non, mais c'est grâce aux documents Snowden que The Intercept fonctionne aussi bien à l'heure actuelle. Personnellement, je ne visite son site que lorsqu'ils sort des nouveaux documents, et c'est le cas de la majorité des gens. Qui dit afflux de traffic dit gros revenus publicitaires, et c'est comme ça que son site tourne, pas grâce aux dons de son public.

>vend des livres

Oui, cf No place to hide. D'ailleurs, il y a des documents qui n'ont pas été leakés autre part que dans son livre, bonne exclusivité :)

C'est pas pour rien que les raisons avancées pour les leaks ont changées, ainsi que les documents diffusés : faute d'avoir du sensationnel sous la main comme PRISM, maintenant il sort des documents qui n'ont rien à voir mais font du clic (ex les capacités de capture de flux vidéos de drones/F16 israëliens) ou sort une grosse archive plein de documents sans intérêts (SIDToday) et en fait dix articles (e.g. RETEX d'un NSAer sur Guantanamo / Irak, etc.).

Il faut bien maintenir l'intérêt du public d'une façon ou d'une autre :)

u/cas18khash · 1 pointr/bestof