Reddit reviews On the Genealogy of Morality
We found 2 Reddit comments about On the Genealogy of Morality. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Hackett Pub Co Inc
We found 2 Reddit comments about On the Genealogy of Morality. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
At the outset, please note that this topic is exceedingly slippery. I am convinced that the most efficient way to understand these issues is through the study of philosophy of ethics.
> Where do atheists get their [sense of] morality?
Nature, nurture, and the phenomenological self-model.
> What defines the "good" and "bad" that has
permeated much of human society?
Easy: notice that personal definitions of morality between individuals immersed in the same culture tend to strongly overlap (e.g., most moderns consider rape to be "bad").
From this considerable volume of data, it is fairly simple to construct principles that adequately generalize these working definitions, such as "promote happiness", and "mitigate pain".
> [If you're not caught, why not murder? Why donate to charity? Does might make right?]
These questions appear to have both practical and intuitive solutions.
What are you trying to understand?
> How do atheists tend to reconcile moral relativism?
What do you mean?
> Barring the above deconstructions, how do atheists account for morality?
Moral theories largely attempt to bridge the gap between descriptive facts and normative commands:
Shameless self-reply: I like this translation of GM, this translation of BGE, and this translation of Z. And it's not just because a professor of mine is the series editor, they're really good.