Reddit reviews The Manipulated Man

It's even available on Amazon. From their own description:

> A wave of sexual misconduct allegations about powerful men have exploded recently in the media (e.g., the news, Twitter #MeToo, etc.). A bold social movement has begun with brave women coming forward and being applauded for speaking out and sharing their stories of abuse, discrimination, and harassment. As a result, accused men like Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, and dozens more have been removed from power and are suffering the consequences.


> In How to Destroy A Man Now (DAMN), Dr. Angela Confidential (a business psychologist, consultant, and human resource professional) empowers women with a step-by-step guide for destroying a man’s reputation and removing him from power.


> In easy to understand terms, the handbook reveals and explains the fundamental dynamics between allegations, the media, and authority as they relate to male misconduct in today’s society. It also unveils and details practical real-world methods for leveraging allegations, media, and authorities to dethrone a man from power.

I'm torn. I really want to maintain the integrity of book reviews left by people who have actually read the book. But on the other hand, should anyone read shit like this?

Conversely: The Manipulated Man and The Feminist Lie: It Was Never About Equality. The first seems like it's worth a read. The second looks almost as toxic as DAMN.

Then you can read this one:

https://www.amazon.com/Manipulated-Man-Esther-Vilar-ebook/dp/B002U8271K

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/insight-therapy/201301/red-alert-science-discovers-the-color-sexual-attraction

"Overall, it appears that men perceive a woman in red as signaling readiness for sex. Female sex-readiness is attractive to men, partly because it is a relatively scarce resource."

I cannot find any articles on it now, to prove my point ,but I've seen research that says the similar things about brightly non natural colored hair and why women might be motivated to do it. Basically, when a woman dyes her hair purple it's because she's seeking new sexual partners. I.E cuckhold thier man. Similar in concept to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_copulatory_vocalizations. If your gal is a screamer, she has some other guy on her mind. ( This is why porn actresses exaggerate thier moans to comical levels, while making eye contact with the camera/viewer. It sells more videos, your lizard brain is hard wired to think she really wishes she was fucking you and not Ron Jeremy.)

Generally, K selected woman aren't going to engage in that sort of peacocking behavior, while R selected women will. R selected women are more likely to be SJWs. It's why cuckoldery is associated with SJWs.

This book explains the relationship between R/K selection and politics pretty well: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/mobile/w/the-evolutionary-psychology-behind-politics-anonymous-conservative/1109689556?ean=9780982947937

Stefan Molynuex on YouTube, a has a playlist called gene wars that explains this pretty well too.

Some other links:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002U8271K/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

https://illimitablemen.com/tag/branch-swinging/