Reddit reviews The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder

This guy has a degree in law, and an impressive track record. It would seem this isn't to be taken lightly.
From The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (Hardcover)
by Vincent Bugliosi:
> About the Author:
> Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964. In his career at the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss. His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of his true-crime classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in publishing history. Two of Bugliosi's other true-crime books-And the Sea Will Tell and Outrage-also reached #1 on the New York Times hardcover bestseller list. No other American true-crime writer has ever had more than one book that achieved this ranking. His latest book, Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, was also a New York Times bestseller, and is being made into a ten-part HBO miniseries, for which Tom Hanks will be a producer. Bugliosi lives with his wife of many years in Los Angeles.

Quick Poll: Who has read Vincent Bugliosi's The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder ?

Are you as convinced as I am of his legal logic?

http://www.amazon.com/Prosecution-George-W-Bush-Murder/dp/159315481X

Retired prosecutor who put away Charles Manson, has prepared a prosecution for President George W Bush.

http://www.amazon.com/Prosecution-George-W-Bush-Murder/dp/159315481X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212269577&sr=8-1
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder

by Vincent Buglioso (author of Helter Skelter and a very competent prosecutor himself)

I've not read it but I heard about the book "the prosecution of GWB for murder" has the information you are looking for: http://www.amazon.com/Prosecution-George-W-Bush-Murder/dp/159315481X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1255061368&sr=8-1. As I understand it the book is a very serious, scholarly and legally sound description of how to mount such a prosecution.

This book might be more interesting that I thought if it's as you described.

Don't forget about this book too.

Impeachment is one thing - the murder charges will be where the real fun starts.

Obama talked a lot about being able to walk and chew gum though. Dealing with the financial collapse didn't require much effort from the DOJ (though they could have done a fuck-ton more in the aftermath). The DOJ--really any and all state AGs--could have pursued cases (still can) against the Bush administration. Vincent Bugliosi (the Charlie Manson prosecutor) even dedicated an entire book to making a case. The issue wasn't that they were too busy. It was that they don't want to be held to account when they leave office either.

GWB(and Co.) lied so bad The California AG that prosecuted Charles Mansion thinks GW should be charged with murder.

Ok, so I'm back. Did you miss me?

ignoring some of the blatant contradictions, and reversals in that lasts response, lets just review.

You have already conceded that The TSA was intentional set up with foreknowledge that it would do no good. A conspiracy to fool America, that has the effect of subjugating travelers.

But you don't want to call it what it is. you have an aggressive reaction to people who do. trying to bully them into the same denial.

If I understand you right, it's because you think they had honorable intentions. you won't believe that they where being malicious, and insist that they where just trying to do the right thing.

Even if that where true (though every indication says it's not). Would it justify any of those crimes of which the TSA is just a small part? Of course it wouldn't. All villainous acts throughout history have been done by people who thought they where doing the right thing. I'm sure behind all the lies and manipulation, they really do believe they are trying to do something good. The thing you have to realize is that their idea of good doesn't include democracy, or liberty of any kind.

So, why do you yell at people and try to stifle open conversation?

I think it is because you are that little boy in the video. You don't want to have to admit to yourself that you went through subjugation rituals just like him. At your school, at your church, where ever it came. you where manipulated by people you where told to trust. people who you thought where there to take care of you, help raise you, protect you. They didn't care about you at all.

That is a hard thing to come to terms with I'm sure, but the least you could do is have enough respect for others who are trying to raise awareness about this group of ideologues who are trying to take over. even if you don't agree with them yet, because you can not deny that they are speaking truth. You just don't like the conclusion.

The most disgusting thing is that you seam to buy into the ideology itself. You say that We would be justified in using force, and manipulation just to maintain dominance, but none of that is justified. You say that people are just stupid and that it's ok to manipulate them if you think you know better than them, but that flies in the face of everything we know of as ethics.

I would hope that in the future you would think about what people are actually saying instead of just judging their validity based on their perceived authority, or rank in your community.

In any case. I will give up here I don't think I could do anything else for you except antagonize you, and while that might be fun, it's not very honest of me.

You should really watch that video. I would hope that you couldn't dismiss a whole TV network with such a long history as conspiracy nuts. They also even try to make concessions for conservative minded people. You could also read this book. It is full of cold facts, and is actually very bipartisan.