Reddit reviews Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11
We found 10 Reddit comments about Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
500 pagesOver 800 color images and diagramsPull out bookmark of street map of Ground Zero with aerial photo identifying physical structuresFully sourced chapter end-notesFull Glossary of Terms and Supplemental Information
I complete understand where you're coming from.
Let me clarify my position a little bit: the presence of thermite is not the big issue here.
My point is that Jones is trumpeting this explanation as the sole reason for the towers' collapses, and this theory has heavily infiltrated the 9/11 truth movement.
The big issue here is that something unconventional brought down those towers...they fell way too fast and completely.
That's why those of us with inquisitive and skeptical minds have been searching for alternate explanations for how they fell...and mostly because of Jones the thermite theory has been unfortunately embraced by many.
You've created a false dichotomy (perhaps one of the reasons Jones is doing what he's doing): you seem to think that if we don't believe Jones then we must be on the side of the US Govt.
That couldn't be further from the truth!
I'm a regular here, and you should know that by my questioning Dr. Jones, I am not questioning the 9/11 Truth Movement as a whole.
Since the only PHD I have is in armchair conspiracy theories, I'm clearly not qualified to question the science of his thermite findings, though I can read the many skeptical individuals who are scientists and who question his results.
However, I can comment on the bigger picture, because Jones' history with the "cold fusion" story should raise huge red flags as to his motivations with the whole thermite thing. Again, watch the film Heavy Watergate to understand what I'm talking about.
Since you seem ready for this information, I can't recommend this book enough.
Once you get past the seemingly implausible premise and look at the actual evidence, this theory becomes frighteningly plausible.
This is the theory /r/conspiracy should be talking about, not Jones and his red herring.
I'm still working my way through Dr Judy Wood's book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRlYwyqDA3Y
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
​
https://vgy.me/NiTnPC.jpg
Before you can charge someone with a crime you have to know WHAT crime was committed and HOW it was done. If your death had been ruled homicide by gunshot, a forensic investigation better report a bullet hole in your body. It matters little WHO destroyed the WTC or WHY they did it because it is unrelated to the evidence of the destruction and moves attention away from its scrutiny. What was the crime that was committed?
​
The order of crime solving, that one must first identify:
​
Since writing her book, Dr. Wood has come to understand more clearly how cover-ups work. People are encouraged to skip step #1 and begin arguing about step #2. In order to argue about HOW "it" happened, people are left to IMAGINE what "it" was that happened. From then on, they are only addressing an imaginary problem, not a real problem. And they can never ever solve the real problem unless they begin with step #1, which defines WHAT the problem is they need to solve. So skipping to step #2, #3, or #4 is a useless path that leads you nowhere. See how easy a cover-up works!
It's available at Amazon for $49.50 plus free shipping. (Less than the cost of a tank of gas for my Jaguar!)
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
What do you think of this book and theory?
If you haven't read it yet, I would be extremely interested to know what you make of it.
This theory is frowned upon by alternative media in a similar way as the snowden-as-limited-hangout theory.
I can understand using baby steps to wake up the general population, but how do we wake up those who are already truthseekers, but who may be hesitant to embrace the "wilder" conspiracy theories?
axolotl_peyotl: ^^original ^^reddit ^^link
How much time have you spent researching the unusual nature of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7?
I totally respect your opinion, but if you want an extremely in depth analysis of this theory, I highly recommend this book. You will have to shell out $40, but you can't seriously debunk this theory without first giving it due diligence.
The pictures alone in the book are enough to convince me that some type of unconventional technology was used that day.
As for the writer of this blog, Joseph P. Farrell, he definitely knows what he is talking about, as he has written over a dozen books on off-the-books technologies and physics models that have been largely kept secret for the past 100 years.
It sounds outlandish, but again, you have to give the subject its due diligence before dismissing it completely.
Your video proves my point. Go to 21:30. Not even enough rubble to fill the lobby, even though it should be at least 12 stories high.
Read this book to educate yourself.
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
Sister_Lauren, as I've told you before, you are the only other one here who admits to agreeing with me.
And it's actually quite strange, because I don't have a vested interest in the nuke hypothesis and thus it makes no difference to me whether people agree with it or they don't.
The problem, I suppose, is I don't support the thermite/nanothermite theory or Judy Wood's DEW theory, although I don't think anyone here supports that. If they do I've certainly not heard it mentioned. Btw, except for her DEW theory, I think Wood's book is excellent, by far the best written description of the demolition of the towers there is, and I would strongly recommend that everyone reads it.
http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
>What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero.
To know what I'm talking about, just read some of the reviews.
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
Thank you for providing this. Reddit has been invaded with skeptics.
Recently reading "Money Mafia" by Paul Hellyer revealed an interesting trick in the book for 9.11: The use of free energy devices (akin to Tesla's beam weapons) that completely annihilate materials and turns them into dust. I have yet to check out the book. "
EDIT: I just found out Judy Wood, the Author of the book has a website.
http://drjudywood.com
Its bullshit, the 9/11 demolition charges and the official story, that's a part of this redacted disinformation one, all to cover their tracks and put it on Saudi Arabia (no matter how hard they deserve for other things, but not this). We need to SHOW people what happened and let them use their own two eyes. Not what they've been told to believe. It was directed energy technology, For years Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) wanted, NO BEGGED for a complete thorough exhaustive, meticulous analysis of the EVIDENCE. Put the pitchforks down, READ.
Dr. Judy Wood undertook the first and to this date ONLY complete scientific forensic analysis of the events that took place on September 11th 2001 available in the public domain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cow8GtYkeA4&list=PLdN42gkvqb35nM6U1MIVsg7W9lDpD8HOh
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1468613890&sr=8-1&keywords=judy+wood
FREE FROM AGENDA OR SPECULATION as to who did it, only what actually happened.
'It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.' Sherlock Holmes
Its dustification, not pulverisation.