(Part 2) Top products from r/DebateFascism

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/11/03/is-it-possible-to-increase-your-height/#1757e5cc5139


http://time.com/4655634/genetics-height-tall-short/


There is a reason that identical twins reach a very similar height, even if separated and live in different environments, as long as they get a minimum threshold of resources, (so that their height isn't stunted in any way). But it's not like if one gets adopted by the royal palace, and the other one gets adopted by a middle class family, that the rich one with more resources will be anything more than slightly taller. As long as they get their appropriate resources, they are intended to reach their blueprint, their genetic DNA design for their body. There is evidence that better resources can positively impact your height slightly, but not much more.


Intelligence is certainly more complex than height, and harder to measure than height, but it certainly isn't "hard to measure" in a vacuum. It is very, very easy to tell whether the person across from you meets a certain level of intelligence or not, and you don't even need a test to do so. The fact that we do have advanced testing methods only solidifies the point.


Sam Harris recently said, "What we have here is a set of nested taboos. Human intelligence itself is a taboo topic. People don't want to hear that intelligence is a real thing, and that some people have more of it than others. They don't want to hear that IQ tests really measure it. They don't want to hear that differences in IQ matter, because they are highly predictive of differential success in life. And not just for things like education attainment, and wealth, but for things like out of wedlock birth, and mortality. People don't want to hear that a person's intelligence is, in large measure, due to his or her genes, and there seems to be very little we can do environmentally, to increase a person's intelligence, even in childhood. It's not that the environment doesn't matter, but genes appear to be 50-80% of the story. People don't want to hear this. And they certainly don't want to hear that average IQ differs across races and ethnic groups. Now, for better or worse, these are all facts. In fact, there is almost nothing in psychological science, for which there is more evidence than these claims, about IQ, about the validity of testing for it, about it's importance in the real world, about it's heritability, and about it's differential expression in different populations. Again, this is what a dispassionate look at what decades of research suggests."


"The efforts to invalidate the very notions of 'general intelligence', and race have been wholly unconvincing from a psychometric and biological point of view. And are obviously motivated by a political discomfort in talking about these things. And I understand and share that discomfort."


If you would like to see the data that backs this stuff up, I would recommend reading 'The 10,000 Year Explosion', by Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending, 'A Troublesome Inheritance' by Nicolas Wade, and 'The Bell Curve', by Charles Murray.


https://www.amazon.com/10-000-Year-Explosion-byHarpending/dp/B006J4LGD6


https://www.amazon.com/Troublesome-Inheritance-Genes-Human-History/dp/0143127160/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_img_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=CAWJC6Z2AZSADXQFYNND


https://www.amazon.com/Bell-Curve-Intelligence-Structure-Paperbacks/dp/0684824299

The ideal for a bachelor is a relatively spartan lifestyle that behooves a true Political Soldier. His diet should consist of simple, healthy meals (that, contrary to the link, should not entirely omit meat). His living space should be his sanctum, and be kept neat and tidy at all times. His style of dress must be smart and practical.

In terms of lifestyle, men must strive to create an appropriate balance between physicality and intellect. It is inevitable that you will lean more towards one than the other, but each is an equally vital aspect of masculinity and should not be neglected. I lean more towards the pursuits of the mind, and so I chose a very physical, manual career to ensure that my body would be kept fit and well-functioning in spite of my naturally slothful inclinations. Even so, I am currently looking for a squash partner. I spend my spare time developing my knowledge through reading. At the moment, I am engaged in a project of comparative theology. I am studying the Srimad Bhagavatam along with the Jerusalem Bible in an attempt to compare and contrast the archetypically Aryan and the archetypically Hebrew religious "styles".

One should also reserve time for "decompression", in which you engage in nonproductive - but still rewarding - activity. Internet browsing counts towards this. So do video games, chess, and the consumption of art and media. One should be very careful with this, however. It is all to easy to become corrupted by decadent, degenerate influences. I speak from experience.

When the bachelor is ready, he graduates into a husband and father. He should pursue a eugenic marriage with a woman who broadly shares his inclinations. I am fortunate enough to have met such a woman, and we are currently engaged in a romantic relationship. I am likely to propose to her within the next three years.

I think that the Ethno State one might be easier to argue from, and perhaps somewhat less controversial. You'd still have to be ready to defend your views very vehemently as well as convincingly. You might need a lot more than simply a 500 character intro just to defend your position well enough so that you'll save a lot of time.

You might have seen some of these before, but here are some very useful links you could use as sources, as well as give you ideas for how to formulate your arguments. Try to understand them as much as possible.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion.

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes.

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships.

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life.

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health.

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group.

[Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust.] (http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf)

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin.

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks.

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites.

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin.

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational.

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you.

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies.

Ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods are beneficial for health.

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism.

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality.

Furthermore, I'd be open to helping you revise the first intro you come up with and offer up my own suggestions for ways you could improve it.

I would be delighted! He is my favorite living scholar. His first breakout work was on the relationship between Leo Strauss and Carl Schmitt. He has since then worked extensively in the field of Straussianism, particularly in revitalizing the academic legacy of Carl Schmitt. He focuses primarily on Strauss's distinction between revealed religion and philosophy and how that informs the role of the philosopher within society. Most of his books tend to be succinct and brief, bordering on laconic.
The top three I would reccomend are "The Lesson of Carl Schmitt", "Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue" , "Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem".

If you have any further questions or want to discuss any of his work I am always happy to do so.

here are links on amazon to the referenced texts:

https://www.amazon.com/Lesson-Carl-Schmitt-Distinction-Philosophy/dp/0226518906/ref=la_B001HCW6QQ_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1512083591&sr=1-3

https://www.amazon.com/Carl-Schmitt-Leo-Strauss-Dialogue/dp/0226518884/ref=la_B001HCW6QQ_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF

https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-Theologico-Political-Problem-European-Philosophy/dp/0521699452/ref=la_B001HCW6QQ_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1512083591&sr=1-5

Everyone should read this book. It explains how the differences between cultures came to be. It's really fascinating.

I'm leaning toward this one. Check out we website "textkit" for lots of good resources for learning Greek (many of them free).

This

This

This

This

>I sometimes wonder if the patriarchy was indeed created to make self-sacrifice more attractive for men. Men were always expected to do the most dangerous jobs like hunting, fighting and protecting the tribe and I think it makes sense, however they also had to be rewarded for it.

Patriarchy wasn't really "created." It was simply a natural outgrowth of biological conditions that existed even before the evolution of modern homo sapiens. If you look at our closest evolutionary cousins, the chimpanzees, they too have a quasi-patriarchal system of social organization with dominant males leading bands of chimps. Most of the fundamental driving forces of human history, including the tendency towards organized violence (war), comes from our evolutionary history. For a very insightful book that talks about this, see Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence by Dale Peterson and Richard Wrangham. Also see Warriors and Worriers: The Survival of the Sexes for a discussion of how male and female genders evolved in human beings.

Wages of destruction by Adam Tooze

History of the Third Reich Series which include:

The Coming of the Third Reich

The Third Reich in Power

The Third Reich at War


Rise and fall of the Third Reich

Thats very good reading material right there.

I'm about to start reading a book called "We" https://www.amazon.com/We-Yevgeny-Zamyatin/dp/0380633132 which was banned in the Soviet Union for obvious reasons. I think it may have been the first of these types of dystopian novels.

When you give a clear, concise reason when some one asks "why" and their response is to once again as "why" what kind of response does that even warrant? Also my heart rate has never exceeded 65 while I was on plebbit.

Homosexuality is genetic; therefore it can and should be bred out. How we go about accomplishing this should be the only debate.

Hyde is mocking the American Neoliberal idolization of Europe as well as ideas on homosexuality.

I would disown a homosexual child of mine.

BSA = Boy Scouts of America

You want facts? Here are some facts I gathered specifically about homosexuals; this does not include my list of facts about transexuals;

Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657413
Between 24% and 90% of lesbians report being psychologically abused by their partners. Source: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml
Gay men are 60x more likely to have HIV than straight men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
Gays are more likely than straight people to have mental illness. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072932/
1/4 gay men in America have had over 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homosexualities-Study-Diversity-Among-Women/dp/0671251503
43% of gay men have over 500 partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homosexualities-Study-Diversity-Among-Women/dp/0671251503
Gay men are six times more likely to commit suicide than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536
Gay men are 12x more likely to use amphetamines than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536
Gay men are 10x more likely to use heroin than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536
Liberal arguments in favor of homosexuality are based on logical fallacies. Source: http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=19028&lang=en
10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813477
Gay people are 2-3x more likely to abuse alcohol than straight people. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536
Up to 50% of lesbians have reported sexual abuse. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9360290
79% of homosexual men say over half of their sex partners are strangers. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536
99.8% of lesbian, gay and bisexual teens will change their sexual orientation within 13 years. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048483
Two-thirds of men and women who were homosexual change their orientation to heterosexual five years later. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/books/11261/004
Two thirds of self-identified lesbians later have heterosexual relationships. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/books/11261/004
Identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual does not end sexual questioning or confusion. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/books/11261/004
One in eight gay men in London has HIV. Source: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/11/18/13-of-gay-and-bisexual-men-in-london-living-with-hiv/
Gay men are twice as likely as straight men to be in interracial relationships. Source: http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/4/1423
In Australia, 25% of homosexuals have had more than 100 sex partners. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 63% of the country’s syphilis cases. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
In 2010, homosexuals were about 200 times more likely than everyone else to be diagnosed with HIV. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Gay men are 15 times more likely to have Hepatitis B than everyone else. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Homosexuals are more to use illegal drugs and drink to excess than straight people. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Homosexuals are more likely than straight people to have anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and to commit suicide. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Gay men are 10-15 times more likely than straight men to have eating disorders. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
40% to 60% of serial killers are homosexuals. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Homosexual men are more likely to have been abused by their partners than straight men. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Monogamy is not a central feature of most homosexual relationships. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Married homosexual men are 50% more likely than straight couples to divorce. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
In the Netherlands, the average homosexual in a “steady relationship” has seven to eight affairs per year. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Over 20% of older homosexuals have had more than 500 different sex partners. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
The average gay man has several dozen sex partners per year. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
28% of homosexuals have had sex with over a thousand men. For straight men? Just 25% have had sex with more than 10 women. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
Most “long term relationships” between gay men last less than eight years. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
Among gay Canadian men in “committed relationships, only 25% were monogamous. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
In one study, only 9% of gay men were monogamous. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
75% of straight men an are faithful, compared to just 4.5% of gay men. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
In Berlin, 83% of gay men in “steady” relationships had had frequent affairs in the last year. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022
Infection rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia are increasing among active homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
Gay men, 1% of the population, account for 83% of syphilis cases. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
Syphilis was almost eradicated, but made a comeback among homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
Active homosexual men are 17 times more likely than straight people to have anal cancer. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
Lesbians are 2.5x more likely than straight women to be obese. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to have eating disorders. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to be stalked or physically abused by their partners. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Married lesbians are 2-3 times more likely to divorce than straight couples. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
Homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals are poorer than straight people. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
America has spent $700 million promoting gay rights abroad – an “integral” part of American foreign policy. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/21/world/africa/us-support-of-gay-rights-in-africa-may-have-done-more-harm-than-good.html?_r=0

> Scorpion and the Frog.

So you don't think Jews are rational actors?

> That and they see it as more imperative to water down European identities than to keep violent crime manageable.

Committing mass suicide to see the destruction of another civilization is irrational. Even modern Islamic suicide bombers expect their wider Islamic society to survive and outnumber their enemies!

>It's funny, I actually admire a lot about your tradition. But diaspora Jews overwhelmingly support things that are bad and harmful for my people. It really is as simple as that.

What's really sad about your worldview is that the Western left thinks the same thing about Jews. We are falsely seen as an evil right-wing third column by the left and an evil left-wing third column by the right. Socialists condemn us as capitalists; capitalists condemn us as socialists; and fascists condemn us for both. That falsehood is why so many Jews have decided to say "fuck those assholes" and completely disregard what the world demands of us.

>Some Israeli Jews have successfully eschewed notions of identity based on being a perpetual outsider however and instead built a real blood and soil nationalism, these are the Jews I can see myself getting along with.

The saddest element of your false historiography is that Jews have been forced into the role of perpetual outsider by the West in spite of our best intentions to assimilate (see: interwar France and Germany). Even when there are no Jews in your countries we are summoned as specters and boogeymen to justify self-inflicted European atrocities (see: accusations of "secret Jews" as part of British and Spanish renaissance-era class conflict).

You should really read Anti-Judaism: the Western Tradition (reviews here and here). I honestly want to hear what you think, with your Scorpion and Frog perspective. Is antisemitism a European irrationality inherent to your culture?