(Part 2) Top products from r/altright

Someone shared that a "Hate Watch" subreddit has this comment linked.

When I went to see it, they only have this small thread within this larger conversation linked. It would have been just as easy to link to the conversation, as a part of the conversation. It's obvious that they're disinterested in what r/AltRight is about -- rather, they're seek only echo chamber indignation fodder.

I was once a Leftist -- but also cared about intellectual integrity (which would explain my move Right). For the Leftist who thinks they've got all the information when their leaders lead, you should know that they're giving you a square inch of a building sized mural -- they are intentionally handling and deceiving you.

Here's something I said in a different part of this conversation. A part the Propaganda Ministers don't include.

[–]AltRightNow 1 point 23 hours ago
Until you get to the White contributions, I would say exactly the same thing. We're always painted as hating everyone else, instead of loving ourselves and appreciating others.
It's true that African, Jewish, and Latin peoples have made some fine contributions to the world. And I'll give credit where credit is due. But that doesn't change the fact that most of the essential contributions to civilizing society are overwhelmingly White. And I'll give credit where credit is due.
permalinkembedsaveparenteditdisable inbox repliesdeletereply

[–]AltRightNow 1 point 18 minutes ago
This book lays out the accomplishments of civilization. I hear that a "hate watch" r/group has this conversation linked. Someone in there might be ready for something more than chanted rhetoric. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060929642/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A2FSDR5QBR3PE4

Thanks. I just found this:
https://www.amazon.com/BABYLONIAN-TALMUD-ALL-VOLUMES-ILLUSTRATED-ebook/dp/B01GY0FCGQ/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1480292460&sr=1-2&keywords=the+talmud

I went to hear a Christian convert out of Islam who is a scholar of both the Bible and the Q'uran, that the Q'uran is not accurately translated into English in order to make it more palatable to the Westerner. I wonder if this same problem exists in the Talmud?

Do you have a particular Talmud that you recommend?

Besides his own work which I think reads best chronologically I enjoy Young's books. Both his biography and "Nietzsche's Philosophy of Religion" https://www.amazon.com/Nietzsches-Philosophy-Religion-Julian-Young/dp/0521681049

This. For those of you who are interested, read "Why We Get Fat and What to Do About It." Also, /r/keto is a very active community with an abundance of information and support.

Only that the left out a few things! Like the ever-important establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 through a secret conspiracy you can find out in The creature from Jekyll Island and a ton of other instances of world Jewry collaborating against the world. However, it's a pretty great summation.

I read Across Atlantic Ice when it was released. While their theory is interesting, it's still far from being accepted.

Edit: Here's a video presenting some of the interesting DNA evidence.

Amazon link to the book. Don't forget leaving a creative one star review.

Might want to visit some other books by Kidner. Apparently the most important person in Europe since 1550 was Lenin.

If you go to the book on amazong, "look inside" and read a little after the preface it refers to vitality as young colored people going into the work force for developed countries with an old aging population. I dont agree with it just saying.

https://www.amazon.com/Diversity-Explosion-Demographics-Remaking-America/dp/081572649X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480844290&sr=8-1&keywords=diversity+explosion

Here is an entire book full of peer reviewed research: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bounce-Myth-Talent-Power-Practice/dp/0007350546

You draw this conclusion from the fact that I recognize that hybrids exist? Or the fact that I still recognize the existence of different races? And I have an interpreted the Jewish holy books to mean anything. I know what they say and I do not believe or follow any of it. Here's a book for you to read.

https://www.amazon.com/Race-Reality-Differences-Vincent-Sarich/dp/0813340861

Sapolsky's "Why Zebras Don't get Ulcers" goes into why forcing mixed groups is harmful. Want to stress the fuck out of a monkey? Put him with a group that's not his own.

The first time I went to Europe I landed in Amsterdam and in the airport even I felt like I had landed at a family reunion. I was palpably happier. I'm not some cranky fucking racist, it's natural.

https://www.amazon.com/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095

This isn't news or anything. What constitutes white was far more restricted before.

He just SHREDDED the alt-right with his feelings when all we have are facts. We should hang our heads in shame.

https://www.amazon.com/Welfare-Ethnicity-Altruism-Evolutionary-Nationalism/dp/0714683523/

I was thinking about posting something about Anglish here. The Norman conquest was a great tragedy and many evils can be traced back to it. Check this out: https://www.amazon.com/Gospels-Anglish-Julian-Montinaro/dp/0557831326/

There were probably no marching orders, per se. Nor a shady cabal. Even if it's not 100% right, COC suggests a reasonable hypothesis. tl;dr It's an evolutionary strategy. Individual Jews acted in their rational self-interest or out of hatred of a system they saw as authoritarian/bigoted/restraining, and the crippled post-WW1 West gave them a receptive audience. These individual actions compounded into larger movements that benefited them all as a group.

It just so happens that sprawling urban societies filled with atomized, deracinated peoples suits middle minorities like the Jews quite well, keeps them safe from movements that lash out against minorities (especially wealthy influential ones), and allows them to nepotistically keep themselves in positions of power and influence.

This is not to say certain groups didn't collude or operate purely out of hatred or greed (e.g. Soros, Bolsheviks, post-1960s feminists, pornographers...), or that the White elite were guiltless, just that there isn't necessarily some all-encompassing conspiracy.

tl;dr read MacDonald's works. And World on Fire.

edit: clarification

edit2: In case it wasn't clear, Jews never stopped identifying as White because it would be contrary to their interest. Why out yourself when it could expose yourself to persecution? What they did do was stop operating within the West's zeitgeist and forced us to adopt theirs.

Of course the book is fake, that's why it was removed from Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Stolen-Soul-Story-Courage-Survival/dp/0646434462

Did you read the book "Night" By Elie Wiesel that we all had to read in High School?

He lied under oath and lied about the things he saw.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiRKv8Fd3HM

> their racism

you're again confusing (maybe in purpose?) what I intended to say. If you've read the Torah, you either read it in a completely superficial manner or you're twisting the facts. Read the book and put some critical thought in the process.

You know the story about Jacob and Edom, right? Do you know what it symbolises? Are you aware how emotions are created in human beings?

Maybe read this book, too

We can go "Not all x" until we get to 1% vs 99%. At what point do you call it a systemic problem?

>To discriminate against somebody because they like to have sex is immoral.

No this is perfectly moral. You can have all the sex you want, just with your one, or at worst, several partners. Not hundreds. This again comes from the perspective of public health concerns, both physically and psychologically.

I've got facts for this point:

[Women with more than 20 sexual partners have an 80% chance of divorce.]
(http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2003/pdf/Bookofcharts.pdf)

[Traditional societies have 'very low' rates of suicide.]
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3067529)

Gay men are six times more likely to commit suicide than straight men.

These behaviors do not lead to happiness in societies, and breaks the social contract. We do not tolerate that here.