Best antiques & collectibles encyclopedias according to redditors

We found 52 Reddit comments discussing the best antiques & collectibles encyclopedias. We ranked the 31 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.

Next page

Top Reddit comments about Antiques & Collectibles Encyclopedias:

u/memynameandmyself · 38 pointsr/rpg
u/MyLegsHurt · 12 pointsr/hockey

Sucks you're being downvoted. FWIW, the logo was used because James Norris thought it fit Detroit but it actually came from a Montreal club that had cycling roots. From 'Total Hockey: The Official Encyclopedia of the National Hockey League':

"Norris had been a member of the Montreal Amateur Athletic Association, a sporting club with cycling roots. The MAAA's teams were known by their club emblem and these Winged Wheelers were the first winners of the Stanley Cup in 1893. Norris decided that a version of their logo was perfect for a team playing in the Motor City and on October 5, 1932 the club was renamed the Red Wings."

u/TrueBirch · 8 pointsr/theydidthemath

Here's a picture of the last time someone tried printing a huge number of articles from the English language Wikipedia. It's basically impossible to print a single book of that size, so I'll assume it will be printed in many volumes like existing encyclopedias. According to this article, Wikipedia would currently fit into 2,762 volumes, each of which contains roughly 1.6 million words.

Weight is the easier part. Amazon says the Encyclopedia Britannica's 32 volumes weigh a total of 66.6 pounds. That words out to a per-volume weight of 2.08 pounds. Multiplying that by the total number of volumes gives 5,748 pounds (2,607 kg).

Now for reading time.

1.6 million words * 2,762 volumes = 4,419,200,000 total words

This study says that fast readers can read at around 330 words per minute. Assume you can maintain that pace for 12 hours every day (a big assumption). Doing the math gives us a total of around 51 years.

u/CanadaJack · 7 pointsr/AdviceAnimals

One day in the distant future, advanced technology will allow us to search out a specific term we're not sure about, like cladding, to figure out what it refers to.

For now, you're stuck using a dictionary, or an encyclopedia if the definition is too ambiguous for you. I'd highly recommend Encyclopedia Britannica if your copy of Webster's or the Oxford English Dictionary is insufficient, or if someone borrowed it and never returned it.

u/Revue_of_Zero · 5 pointsr/AskSocialScience

Although there exists Judaism (the religion) and the Jewish people (the ethnic group descended from Israelites and Hebrews), the Jewish people are also often called an "ethnoreligious group" because their identity and history are seen as strongly interrelated with their religion (its contents and history). For example, Boyarin - Orthodox Jew and historian of religion - argues the following:

>Jewishness disrupts the very categories of identity, because it is not national, not genealogical, not religious, but all of these, in dialectical tension with one another.

The interrelation between the two and the term "Jew" is ancient. Per the Encyclopedia Judaica:

>After the destruction of Israel only Judah remained, and the term “Yehudi,” or “Jew,” then lost its specific connection with the Southern Kingdom. This is strikingly illustrated in Esther 2:5, 5:13, where Mordecai, although belonging to the tribe of Benjamin, is called a Yehudi. This term was also utilized at that time for the Jewish religion since it is related that, after Haman’s downfall, many from among the people of the land converted to Judaism (mityahadim, Esth.8:17). The term “Jew” connoted by this time a religious, political, and national entity, without differentiation between these categories.

The definition of Jew it provides is halakhic, which is how "Jew" is historically determined:

>Halakhic Definition

>Both a child born of Jewish parents and a convert to Judaism are considered Jews, possessing both the sanctity of the Jewish people (Ex. 19:6) and the obligation to observe the commandments [...]

---

Regarding halakhah, Dorff explains:

>Halakhah, the word used to refer to Jewish law, comes from the Hebrew root meaning “to walk” or “to go”; this indicates that Jewish law prescribes a path through life, detailing what an individual should and should not do, according to divine commandments (∗mitzvot) as they have been interpreted and applied by legal scholars throughout the ages.

>Halakhah occupies a central place in Jewish identity. Although theological convictions define Jewish understandings of ∗God, humanity, the ∗environment, and the relationships among them, Judaism has never defined itself in terms of official creeds. Instead, the focus is on actions. At the same time, ∗Judaism, in general, and Jewish norms of conduct, in particular, are not defined exclusively by halakhah. Stories, proverbs, ∗prayers, ∗thought, history, and ethical and theological convictions all shape how Jews understand themselves and determine how they should act [...]

>Now that Jews are citizens of the countries in which they live, they are governed by the state in civil and criminal matters. This means that individual Jews must determine for themselves how much authority halakhah will have in other areas of their lives. This has led to great diversity in Jewish practice and in Jewish interpretations of the ongoing authority of halakhah. Orthodox, Conservative, Reconstructionist, and Reform ∗Judaisms differ on these issues, within denominations as well as with the other movements.

---

The question of who is a Jew is a big question. See also what Encyclopedia of Judaism compiled by Karesh and Hurvitz has to say:

>The term Jew was first used as a reference to anyone who came from ERETZ YISRAEL (the Land of Israel) during the first EXILE in BABYLONIA. Prior to the exile these people were referred to as Bnei Yisrael, Children of Israel, emphasizing the lineage to the PATRIARCHS. Since those who remained and returned after the first Exile descended mostly from the tribe of JUDAH, whose territory had abutted JERUSALEM, they came to be known as Jews (Neh 1:2). During the time of the Greeks and Romans, and the second Exile beginning in 70 C.E., those whose ancestors came from Eretz Yisrael became known as ioudaios, or Jews.

Regarding Jewish identity,

>The question of Jewish identity in the modern world is complex, involving not just a person’s religious beliefs and affiliation but also his or her cultural and national identity. As the modern world became more secular, so too did the Jews (see ACCOMODATION; ASSIMILATION; MODERNITY). ORTHODOX JUDAISM defines Jewish identity fairly simply: anyone who was born to a Jewish mother or who observes Jewish law (HALAKHAH) is Jewish. In this traditional realm, it is clear that a Jew is a person who participates in Jewish rituals and believes in the tenets of the Jewish tradition.

>Yet many people in the modern world think of themselves as Jews even though they reject the binding nature of Jewish law, as has occurred in REFORM JUDAISM and RECONSTRUCTIONIST JUDAISM, and even if they do not affiliate with any Jewish religious movement at all. The issue becomes one of group identification and self-identification: how people perceive themselves, and how the family, school, and Jewish community impact the development of a person’s identity as a child and
into adulthood.


>Orthodox and Conservative institutions only recognize a person as a Jew if he or she has a Jewish mother or has formally converted to Judaism. Reform Judaism considers a person a Jew even if only the father is Jewish and the person is raised as a Jew. This creates tensions between the movements regarding Jewish identity [...]

>Mordecai KAPLAN, the founder of Reconstructionist Judaism, defined Judaism not as a religion, but as a civilization, with its own land, language, laws, sanctions, art, and social structure. Kaplan felt that religion was but one aspect of Jewish identity, and the Jew in the modern world seems to agree, finding myriad ways to be Jewish inside and outside of religious life.

---

For illustration, according to the Pew Research Center,

>Nearly all Jews in the United States and Israel say they are proud to be Jewish, and large majorities in both countries say they feel a strong sense of belonging to the Jewish people. But the two Jewish communities do not always agree about what it means to be Jewish, according to a new Pew Research Center survey of religion in Israel (compared with our 2013 survey of U.S. Jews) [...]

>The notion that a person can be Jewish even without observing the Sabbath or believing in God may be tied to the idea held by many Jews that being Jewish is more about ancestry or culture than about religion. Indeed, a plurality of Jews in Israel (55%) and a majority in the U.S. (62%) say this is the case for them personally, although 23% in each country say their Jewish identity is about religion and ancestry/culture equally.

u/G-Brain · 5 pointsr/math

A dynamical systems reference book might be appropriate, e.g. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems by Katok and Hasselblatt.

In the book by Broer and Takens it is remarked (p. 123) that the Russian terminology is slightly different. A topological conjugation is called an 'orbital equivalence'. That might help you find additional material.

u/EM1sw · 4 pointsr/knifeclub

All I can tell you is it's probably Italian, looks very similar to This knife. Maybe you can find someone with a Goins' Encyclopedia or something like it to help you with the markings.

Here is also a 13" similar one

u/Hartifuil · 4 pointsr/Paleontology

(This is a good start.)[Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Life https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0751309559/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_GI7QzbC3DZ15K] Darren Naish is good but I doubt much of his work will be in whatever language writes palæontology.

u/danesgod · 3 pointsr/chemistry

Check the journals that normally publish organic papers: JACS, JOC, Angew. Chem., Org. Lett, etc. and search for "isolation" in the title.

Check your library for this book

J. Nat. Prod. and Nat. Prod. Updates mentioned above.

u/BDA_shortie · 3 pointsr/Wicca
u/afurioushippo · 2 pointsr/math

What level of dynamical systems are we talking here? Graduate or undergraduate. In the former case I would recommend: http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Dynamical-Encyclopedia-Mathematics-Applications/dp/0521575575
and for an undergraduate approach I would recommend:
http://www.amazon.com/Differential-Equations-Dynamical-Introduction-Mathematics/dp/0123497035
Both are pretty fun introductions to the subject. Good luck in your search

u/rgov · 2 pointsr/codes

Well, that means that the author has access to 5 separate editions, which I would think should be difficult to obtain. But, you're right that the 11th Edition is freely available online. A replica of the first edition can be purchased for nearly $200, but there's no guarantee it has the same number of pages as the original. I couldn't find anything about the third, fourth, or fifth editions.

The 15th edition is 32-volumes, so it seems like only using 5 of them would have been an underutilization of the resource. I'm also not sure if page numbers are continuous across volumes. It doesn't look like this is the case, since Volume II of the eleventh edition begins on page 1.

u/felesroo · 2 pointsr/writing

I can recommend "The Craft of Research" http://www.amazon.com/Research-Chicago-Writing-Editing-Publishing/dp/0226065685

The title is a bit misleading. This book is far more about writing non-fiction than it is advice about doing the preparatory research. I used this when writing my doctoral thesis. If you are going to embark upon such a project, I highly recommend getting your hands on a copy. It's worth owning your own, but if you can't, try to look at one in a library.

u/WishiCouldRead · 2 pointsr/tipofmytongue

I had this one as a kid, but it's not brown, and there are tons like it. Have you browsed Amazon for mythological creatures? There's a brown one that pops up here.

u/emc2rae · 2 pointsr/evolution

Looking around my office, the most promising one is The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution. It's a bit expensive, but the authors are top-notch.

u/CrimsonAllah · 2 pointsr/DnD

There’s a rule book that’s already made for KotoR. I would steer clear of having a favorite at the table like an establish main character such as revan. That could make it hella less fun feeling like a side kick rather than your own person as a hero.


https://www.amazon.com/Knights-Republic-Campaign-Guide-Roleplaying/dp/0786949236/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1503709139&sr=1-1&keywords=knights+of+the+old+republic+role+playing

u/SokPuppet · 2 pointsr/swtor

I guess sorta, my page views have gone from r/trees to r/swtor mostly, I'm planning a Star Wars D20 RPG game in the old republic setting, hopefully something around the game timeline or the prequel books. I was looking at getting the Star Wars D20 Knights of The Old Republic campaign setting, but then I found out that Wizards of the Coast decided to not renew the Star Wars license so now the cost of the books has skyrocketed. The Star Wars D20 Knights of The Old Republic campaign setting is going for 91$ used on amazon, and 199$ new on amazon... god damn....

u/darthgarlic · 2 pointsr/UFOs

Once again I suggest reading The UFO encyclopedia. You will be a well read UFO semi-expert when you are done reading it. It is expensive, it cost me $114 4 years ago. It is a 2 volume set but it can be found at most large libraries. The UFO book is an abridged version which is much cheaper.

u/sonowthatimhere · 2 pointsr/Judaism
u/miomike · 2 pointsr/Paleontology

I actually just searched for this sub with this exact question in mind! However I was thinking of something that introduced species chronologically, (i.e. starts with the messy buggers in the pre-cambrian, and works it's way through as much as we know).

Basically sparked by reading up on saber-toothed cats and finding out they're not actually Felidae, and I realised that while I absolutely love reading about pre-historic life, I really don't have much basis in knowing fully the various branches of life that have existed. Convergent evolution is amazing to read about, but so is evolution itself!

Just wish-listed these three books (1, 2, 3) on amazon, wondering if anyone could recommend if any of those might be what I'm looking for in terms of prehistoric life overall (and not just dinosaurs, though dinosaurs are obviously super cool too) but also possibly recommend any, as I know these are very broad overview encyclopedia's with pretty pictures. Don't mind detail and complexity, but not that interested in the process of excavations and such as it relates to palaeontology.

u/Awerlu · 1 pointr/myfriendwantstoknow

http://www.amazon.com/Element-Encyclopedia-Magical-Creatures-Fantastic/dp/140273543X/
I have this book personally. I really like it. It gives you everything from mythological to modern day legends.

u/caessa_ · 1 pointr/wow

Not hurting my feelings. My guild is only 12-15 hrs. But your logic is heavily flawed. You specifically said you if "you don't have blackhand down by now, you are not hardcore".

Um. http://www.wowprogress.com/ Look up top 100. Not all have downed Blackhand.

>Reading comprehension is hard durr.

http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Critical-Reading/dp/1592573401

Give me your address, I'll order this to help you out.

u/gabrielsburg · 1 pointr/bjj

I got this book recently, but haven't had a good chance to go through it yet. Encyclopedia of Leglocks by Rigan Machado.

u/CreamedButtz · 1 pointr/buildapcsales

Well now, you can!

u/-Malky- · 1 pointr/france

Et encore, c'est pas tant que ça.

Il y a quelques un petit paquet d'années j'ai acheté un bouquin qui s'appelle "Dictionnaire des langues elfiques". Il n'y a eu qu'une seule édition avec un relativement faible tirage, et récemment j'ai vu le prix de ce livre en occasion... ben manifestement y'a de la demande

Plus sérieusement l'édition Folio Society c'est pas spécialement abusé comme prix pour un beau livre - après oui, c'est cher par rapport à un livre de poche, c'est sûr.

u/nfdgoisn · 1 pointr/rpg

Playing KOTOR or SWOTOR (now free?) will likely give you some great ideas. I'm running a D6 campaign set in Legacy era and it's been pretty awesome so far--but I've been playing the first KOTOR to get a general grasp of the universe and it's definitely been helping a lot. You might also want to check this out.

u/greenroom628 · 1 pointr/pics

this was mine.

u/Dannei · 1 pointr/technology

>Of your average 1 TB drive, how much is eaten up with system files, music, movies, caches, games, applications, overhead for DRM (think wrappers around text, a la PDF), etc.

Beside the point - we are talking entirely storage here, for which you can dedicate an entire 1TB (or whatever) hard drive.

To ignore the XML arguments, you can go by Wikipedia's word count, which it states is 50x the Encyclopaedia Britannica for English, or 160x for all languages. Words aren't the best comparison for data, but I think it's fair to say that the average word length will be almost identical for that much writing, so the amount of data stored scales roughly with number of words.

This 32-volume version of the EB is quoted at 32,640 pages. The going rate I can find on the internet for book printing is approximately 1p per page (e.g. Amazon's price), although I suspect you could reduce this if you were printing a lot of books.

At that rate, the EB would be £326.40, and English Wikipedia would be about £16,320. For comparison, I could buy two 3TB hard drives for the price of one EB, easily containing Wikipedia (including all that metadata) several hundred times over! You would have to get your printing costs ridiculously low (e.g. £15 for the entire 32-volume EB) to start getting below the costs of storing Wikipedia on USB sticks, let alone hard drives.

u/WPaladin · 1 pointr/suggestmeabook

> can you recommend an encyclopedia? I can only find them focused on weapons or survivor skills or witchcraft and other really specific subjects.
Britannica was the last set I purchased. Mine is a few years old though you might be able to check them out from a local library because they are pricey.

http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Britannica-32-Book-Set/dp/0852299613

u/mactheterrible · 1 pointr/swrpg

I would recommend WotC Star Wars Saga Edition. I think the rules are more streamlined than the original d20 CRB or RCRB. I still own my copies (though EotE has COMPLETELY replaced Star Wars roleplaying for me!) and I think they're quality books. They're not too expensive yet...but they're running 20% above original retail at least.

Star Wars Saga Edition Core Rulebook

Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide

Jedi Academy Training Manual

I have these books and a couple more that I might consider selling. PM me if you're at all interested in talking. :D

u/CleaveItToBeaver · 1 pointr/rpg
u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/rpg

Can't upvote this enough; simply haven't been able to justify a copy of the 3.5 edition Draconomicon but man... what a book! So beautiful, so detailed, it would live on my coffee table with a big dictionary, atlas and some guilty pleasures...

u/belleslettres · 1 pointr/tipofmytongue

Any of the following? Or do any of them have a similar look/style to what you remember? I immediately thought of DK, but the chronological order and prehistoric life thing makes me think it would have been more of a general biological life encyclopedia than one with an "animal" slant.

Wonders of Learning First Animal Encyclopedia (a bit late, 2009)

DK's Visual Encyclopedia of Animals (2001)

Kingfisher First Encyclopedia of Animals (1999)

DK's Visual Encyclopedia of Animals (2005)

DK's Animal Encyclopedia (First Reference Series) (2008)

DK's Animal Encyclopedia (2000)

EDIT: Here's what I mean about a general biological life encyclopedia:

DK Nature Encyclopedia (1998)

u/river-wind · 1 pointr/philosophy

Being a part of the Haplorhini clade does not make an individual member a monkey. If it did, Apes would be monkeys, which they are not. Modern members of the clade Haplorrhini are monkeys if they are not Hominidae, but the common ancestors between those groups are not members within those groups; they are not old world or new world monkeys themselves. The common ancestor of modern apes and monkeys is not a monkey, as it does not have the anatomical feature required to be classified as a monkey.

I recommend the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution

u/SHITTING_SHURIKENS · 1 pointr/books
u/Bankky · 1 pointr/pics

I think he may already have

u/KrisK_lvin · 1 pointr/MensRights

> scholarly journals, or newspapers, something along those lines.

Hmm I recommend checking the chapters on use of sources in a book like this or this.