(Part 2) Best digital cameras according to redditors
We found 5,637 Reddit comments discussing the best digital cameras. We ranked the 1,402 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
So:
Hi /u/BranFlake5 - Good question. In my view, the principal reason is price.
That said, the GH4 has a few other advantages over the A7s besides price and internal 4K:
The [$2498 A7s] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00JIWXTXG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00JIWXTXG&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) is a fabulous camera - but I am very happy that I bought the [$1698 GH4] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I9GYG8O/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00I9GYG8O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) and was able to keep the extra $800 in my pocket.
Best,
Bill
Lumix LX7 goes on sale for $300 often.
The GH5 outperforms any camera in the sub-$2000 range despite it's small sensor.
/u/SauceGottiOoeww - I am a GH4 shooter who rented the GH5 a few weekends ago, and the GH5 is a much better camera.
When I had to turn it in to the rental house and go back to my "old" GH4, I immediately missed these features:
If budget permits, the [$1997.99 GH5] (https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-LUMIX-Mirrorless-Camera-Body/dp/B01MZ3LQQ5//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) is definitely worth $800 more than a GH4 (even if that [GH4 comes with a free copy of V-LOG] (https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4-Mirrorless-Recording-DMW-SFU1-VLOG/dp/B01D40CASW//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20)).
Hope this is helpful and good luck with your decision!
Budget Rig
I mainly shoot internet video for my daughter and events.
> And that is at least 3 or 4 thousand dollars of gear she is holding
How do you figure? It's a 70d which is $999, probably has a kit lens on it so make that $1350 total. Even if the flash is a 600EX (which is unlikely for the entry level "enthusiast" Canon DSLR - it would literally be half the cost of her camera), that's only bringing it to $1950 total (realistically (if her flash is even Canon) she's got the 430ex at $250 making her total $1600), nowhere near "at least 3 or 4 thousand".
> Also, on a Canon like that you wouldn't be looking through the viewfinder to fiddle with settings when the body has two screens and about 250 buttons.
Also it's worth pointing out that anyone with half a clue will fiddle with settings looking through the viewfinder - that way you're learning how to change settings on the fly while composing the shot rather than staring at the back of the camera like an amateur while you miss the shot - this is actually the reason it has "about 250 buttons (actually 30 tops).
> This is just a rich girl going all out for instagram.
I think you might be the one without a clue here.
Hi /u/MrFreeTania - at your price point, I would consider spending an extra few dollars for the [~$335 Canon EOS M with the 22mm f2 lens] (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A/?tag=battleforthew-20) for good low light performance.
This is going to be the most camera you can buy for your money. It is a less expensive version of the Canon T4i - without the mirror and optical viewfinder which are useless for video.
Here is what this camera can do:
Fashion (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/72938179
Live music (shot in RAW): http://vimeo.com/75122636#t=38s
Skate: http://vimeo.com/80326419
Travel: http://vimeo.com/55604121
Travel: http://vimeo.com/61150313
This camera will give you the best bang for your buck at your budget level.
Good luck!
HCR
Shane Carruth's "Upstream Color" was shot with a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 DSLR camera. A bit more expensive that most phones, and way cheaper than a professional rig, so it'd be a good compromise IMO.
The movie looks great. I'd say that the right gear, in the right hands, is very capable.
If you want comparable quality (or better) then stick with Sony and pick up the a7RII. Nothing else even comes close, including the Fuji.
Side by side comparisons show the Sony blows the Canon out of the water with almost no comparison between them. In fact, the Sony a7RII is presently the highest rated camera on the market (by the numbers) and it's much lighter and smaller overall than the Canon or the Nikon.
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A7R-II-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III___1035_795
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Full-Frame-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-ILCE7RM2/dp/B00ZDWGFR2
The Sigma Art lenses work flawlessly on the Sony so you can still execute on your plan to pick up the full line.
You may also want to consider picking up a lightweight monopod. Get a collapsible one and sling it so you don't need to carry it and when you go to shoot you'll be a lot happier for it.
Edit: I felt it mattered. I shoot with the Nikon D810 with the 14-24, 24-70, 70-200mm f2.8 Nikon lenses.
If you choose to buy from Amazon, it would be awesome if you used this link, because then we will get a small % of the sale, which we use for community building. (Giving out gold and prizes for competitions, etc.)
I also vote for the Lumix LX7. Either that or one of those tough/waterproof cameras.
It's fine. DSLRs are extremely high quality and are designed for being able to do streaming if that's what you want to use it for. Lots of big streamers use them when they run out of available webcam upgrades.
Edit: Turns out it depends on the individual camera. A "Canon DSLR" which is what most people think of when they hear "DSLR", is not designed for lengthy video recording. Other DSLR cameras which use the same kind of technologies are designed with those tolerances in mind and can be used for streaming. Here's an example: https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Mirrorless-Camera-Megapixels-DMC-GH4KBODY/dp/B00I9GYG8O
This prosumer camera is over $3K and that doesn't even come with the lens. If you want some really nice pictures you have to pay the big bucks.
A full frame sensor does not guarantee good image quality, so the comparison is really based on how different cameras process the video.
The GH4's 4K recording uses 1:1 sample from the sensor, so image quality is very good with low aliasing or moire. Other cameras (especially ones with higher MP sensors) may process the video differently (e.g. pixel binning, etc.) which causes more noticeable aliasing, moire, and a loss of detail.
For example, the Canon 5D MKIII's HD output is noticeably softer than the GH4's (or GH3's, or GH2's, etc.) HD output, and the GH4's 4K IQ only widens that divide even further.
At the same time, the HD and 4K output of Sony's a7S II (another camera with a full-frame sensor) is quite good in comparison to the GH4's 4K output when downsampled to HD.
Jump to the Panasonic GH5, then use a metabones speed booster to adapt your Canon EF mount lenses to the micro four thirds Panasonic lens mount.
Get a E-PL1
Olympus PEN E-PL1
http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL1-Interchangeable-Digital-Black/dp/B0035LBRJO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344179036&sr=8-1&keywords=e-pl1
Here is a photo I just took
http://500px.com/photo/11002583
I use the Panasonic lens. Panasonic lens are better for video because they are silent auto focus but I heat the OLYMPUS kit lens is better then the Panasonic one.
The Canon S95 is a great camera that features most of the same features as the G11/G12. It's small so it won't pack the zoom range that you desire, and it's nearly in your $300 price range.
I'm sure others will chime in with different suggestions, but here's how I would spend it:
Canon T3i, body only: http://amzn.com/B004M170YC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens: http://amzn.com/B0007YZLFS
It's a little over your budget, but not by much. If you're willing to spend a little more, I'd upgrade to a 60D. Eventually you'd come to appreciate the extra control dial and better autofocus. http://amzn.com/B0040JHVCC
The cheap kit lens that can come with cameras will produce acceptably sharp images, but will severely limit you in terms of your ability to get good photos indoors in less than perfect lighting. A good lens that opens up to at least f/2.8 is far more important than the camera body you choose- if you go Nikon or Pentax or Sony or whatever, try to budget in a nice bright lens. I have this Tamron, and I love it. It's very sharp, and is a fantastic deal.
Whatever camera you end up with, go jump on /r/PhotoClass2013 so you know what you're doing when your child shows up!
For that much money you're better off buying a decent point-and-shoot with manual exposure mode, and faking the tilt-shift "model effect" in GIMP.
Maybe this one.
The D3400 kit is pretty great. I've had it a few months and love it. comes with 2 lenses and just over 600. No issues with it so far.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01KITZRBE/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1521117122&sr=8-6&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=d3400&dpPl=1&dpID=510NOgQOKEL&ref=plSrch
The Canon 7D (the one he has) is $1,168.
Source: http://www.amazon.ca/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B002NEGTTW
I'd keep it simple if I were you and pick the Lumix LX7 for trips like this.
Thanks! It's taken with a Canon EOS M, which you can find crazy deals on all the time, such as http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A
longtime DSLR owner here: you don't want a DSLR because they are bulky and you will end up worrying about it getting dropped, knocked around etc.
You want a 'big sensor' in a compact body. Sigma DP 1 and DP2 started this a few years ago and now they are getting common.
I would get something like this Canon M
It has the same APS-C sensor as it's DSLR brothers and you can exchange lenses but it's the size of a compact.
Same output quality as a DSLR (RAW is available) but it doesn't make you a target and you can put a skin or camera armor on it or just duct tape the branding and logos and become invisible.
They had these on sale a minute ago for $299. Watch for it to drop again. For $299 USD with a nice fast f/2 lens it's a steal. I wouldn't pay $500 for it.
Edit: Here is another example of the type of cam I refer to : a APS-C sensor in a compact body with some lens swap ability (usually needs an adapter) CLICKY These are on sale now in the US. These and others may be avail in your price range elsewhere if you are aware of them and look for them.
I know next to nothing about photography, so an opinion from me is pretty much useless. However, I can share with you what I have been using for the past 2ish years.
Sony NEX3N. Great raw quality IMO. The entire setup with the battery and stock lens comes out to 13.1oz. It's definitely a luxury, and yes, I could just take pictures with my phone, but I feel like the quality of pictures I get with the camera make it worth the weight.
This camera has fit in every hip belt pocket that I've ever owned (along with ziplock bag filled with a microfiber towel, extra battery, and extra SD card).
Check out some of its raw pics.
have you thought of the Sony RX100 ii? I got one for the same reasons you listed above and I love it. Tiny and great shots. Decent sensor too and in your price range.
this
BH Photo Video
Adorama
KEH
Amazon.
If you're willing to look at interchangeable lens cameras, an older Micro Four Thirds system might be in budget. I can see used/refurbished Olympus E-PL1s on Amazon, with a 28-84mm equivalent zoom, for under $250. That leaves you $100 to try and track down a longer zoom lens for when you need more reach.
Not as pocketable as your compacts, especially with two lenses, but will give far better results.
Canon S95 can be had for around 250 I believe.
Oly E-p1 about 200 with lens
Sony Nex 3 about 350 ish
Fuji S4200 A bit cheaper still
Hard to narrow it down any with the only known criteria being sub 500 dollars. But the above are all (in my opinion) very good cameras for the money. I'm a fan of buying used because you can get a little bit more for your money since digital stuff just depreciates like crazy.
I think for an upgraded P&S the Nikon is a solid camera as well. You can nab it used for a pretty deep discount.
I have this that I use only for my baking. It's not a DSLR but I'm happy with the pictures I've gotten: 1 & 2. Also really like being able to choose where to focus through the display. Doesn't quite fit in your pocket though.
A lot of the times I take pictures with my iPhone, so long as there is enough light they turn out ok.
I'm still trying to figure out why the D50 and D70 are so similarly priced
Cameras appear to lose their value more slowly over time, and eventually reach about ~$200, which is about as low as you'll find a working dSLR.
So my question is would the extra $100 or so be worth it for the DSLR/Lens over the point and shoot or would the quality of the images be too little to notice the difference
Depends on what you're trying to do. A modern point and shoot will probably offer video and, possibly, better low-light performance in some circumstances. A DSLR with a 50mm prime will offer much better bokeh, decent low-light performance, better flash performance (if you buy a flash), and, probably, more manual controls (for, say, very long or very short shutter speeds), as well as manual focus (if that becomes important).
If I were in your shoes, I'd probably try to stretch for a Canon s95 or s90 (about $250 used or refurb'ed). But then, I value the portability; if you value the other features (especially the ability to produce bokeh in pictures of people), an older dSLR will serve you better.
i would only recommend either the Canon S95 or the Panasonic Lumix LX5.
i have the s95 and so far as point and shoot cameras go, it is excellent. i like that i get various controls (aperture priority, shutter priority, manual mode) and the 720p video has stereo audio. from my research the LX5 is feature-for-feature similar but with a slightly wider lens and obviously different ergonomics.
ignore this comment, just a temporary step to make sure I have the formatting right before I paste it into the FAQ.
| Price | Used Mirrorless | New Mirrorless | Used DSLR | DSLR
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| under $100 | original NEX 3 (body only) | | |
| $100 - $200 |NEX F3, Nex 5, Nex 5R, Fuji X-E1 (body only) | |Canon 20D, 30D, T3 (body only), Nikon D3100 (body only), Sony A500 |
| $200-$300 | Fuji XE-1, Olympus E-m5 or E-m10 (body only) | | Canon T5, T3i, T2i|
| $300-$400 | Sony A5000, A6000 (body only) | |Canon 5D mark 1, 1D mark 2, 60D, T6, SL1, Pentax K-5 II/III, Nikon D3300, D7000 |
| $400-$500 | Ricoh GR | | | Nikon D3300
| $500-$700 | Fuji XT-1 | Sony A6000, Fuji X-A3| Nikon D700, D7100, T5i, T6i, 7D| Nikon D3400, Pentax K-50, K-S2, K-70 (body only), Canon SL1, T6, T5i
| $700-$1000 | Fuji X-T1, Sony A7| Fuji X-E2, Canon EOS M5, Olympus OM-D E-M5 II (body only) OM-E E-M10, Panasonic GH4 (body only) | Nikon D600/610, Canon 6D, 5DII, 80D | Pentax K-3ii (body only), K-70, Canon 70D, 80D, Nikon D7200
| $1000 - $1500 | Olympus OMD-M5 II, Fuji XPro2 (body only), Sony A7R | Fuji X-T10, Sony A6500, Panasonic G80/85, GX8 (body only)| Canon 7DII, Nikon D750, D800, Sony A99 | Pentax K-3 ii, Canon 6D, 80D, 7D2
| $1500 - $2000 | Sony A7s | Sony A7ii, OM-D E-M1, Fuji X-T2, Panasonic GH5 | Canon 5DIII, Nikon D810 | Nikon D750, D500, Pentax K-1 (body only)
| $2000+ | | Sony A7RII, A7SII | | Canon 1DX II, 1DC, 5D IV, 5DS, 5DS R, Nikon D5, D810, D810a, Df, Sony A99ii
| Price Range | Point & Shoot | Mirrorless | DSLR |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| $0-100 | Budget compacts. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions. |||
| $100-200 | Mid-range compacts and superzooms. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions.|||
| $200-300 | Some older premium cameras like the Canon S100. || Used models 7-9 years old. |
| $300-400 | More premium cameras like the Canon S120, Panasonic Lumix LX7, or Fuji XF1. | Micro Four Thirds systems like Olympus PEN or Panasonic Lumix G | Used models models 2-5 years old. |
| $400-500 ||| Used mid-tier models 4-6 years old.|
| $500-700 | Top-end point & shoot like the Fuji X20 or Sony RX100. | APS-C systems like Sony NEX or Samsung NX. | New entry-level models. Used full frame models. |
| $700-1000 ||| Mid-tier models like the Canon 60D or Nikon D7000. |
| $1000-1500 || Premium systems like Fuji X or premium Micro Four Thirds like the Olympus OM-D EM-5 or Olympus OM-D EM-1. ||
| $1500-2000 ||| Entry-level full frame models like the Canon 6D or Nikon D600. |
Canon Elph 300HS plus CHDK perhaps?
That or an old used Rebel maybe?
Ok, just need a tiny point and shoot for my wife to carry around in her purse. Right now have it narrowed down to these two:
Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS
and
Panasonic DMC-FH25K
They seem fairly similar from what I can tell. The lumix does 720 video while the canon does 1080, but not a deal killer. Also the lumix has a bit father zoom, but 5x is probably plenty in most cases for this application. Our canon sd1200is worked fine for two years taking pictures plenty good enough for our needs, but now the lense is stuck open. Anyway, if anyone here knows more about the specs, if one of these has the edge I'll gladly take suggestions. I'm no photographer, but would like something that is decent for the buck at least.
I have the Canon 80d and like it. It’s a good well rounder and my only complaint is the low light performance (however the lens could have something to do with this). However I will mention this is $1000. An option I see often (never have used myself) and is cheaper ($500-$900) is the Sony A6000 or the Sony A6300 (or a newer model). These are mirrorless and when you look at the viewfinder and make changes, that is what the image will look like. The A6300 might be more future proof with its 4K video if video is of interest. These would be good photo options from what I can tell (but again take that with a grain of salt since I’ve only used the 80d). If you are interested in more video vs photography another cheaper option would be the Panasonic G7 and is 4K. I cannot speak for Nikon, but they seem like good budget cameras, but may be lacking video wise. But overall the glass will make more of a difference than the camera! Any of these options would be a step up from your smartphone!
Camera links (Amazon)
Sony Alpha a6000
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_7eQkDbQD2A5PY
Sony Alpha a6300
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_5gQkDbYD1ET6T
Panasonic G7
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_aiQkDbKSNBTTR
Canon 77D (80D alternative)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06VSTCWJ9/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_4kQkDbJGAEWNA
Canon 80D
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_ZjQkDbTAJB668
Here's some options that I like, if you don't mind buying used you'll have more room to buy more lenses and any other gear you'll like, but these are all new and all kits which includes the body and a lens.
If you want to stick with Nikon the D5600 is an amazing camera, the image quality and usability are awesome.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VW3KC9X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_M-GNDb4BPTVEJ
If your willing to spend a little more the D7100 is a great camera I can only find the body and not a kit but you could just get a lens separately.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/927106-GREY
You could also buy a Used D600 for around $600-$650 with a low shutter count if you are interested in full frame, then spend the rest on a lens.
For Canon If your on a budget I'd recommend something like the rebel 7ti
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07P15K8Q7/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_IgHNDb2YN44GR
If you're willing to spend more the 77D is a great option, the first link the the 77D with a 18-55 and the second is a 18-55mm + 55-250mm
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07KVS93ZF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_KhHNDbV4SY44F
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06Y1YVWLH/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_vFHNDbWGFF6GX
As for mirrorless I recommend these cameras.
Canon EOS M50
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07TWB61Z2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_kxHNDb2NM14RY
Sony a6300
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_xAHNDbN04X71G
Fujifilm X-T20 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01NCVN74T/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_pCHNDb74CQ8X6
If you ask for suggestions on this sub, people are always going to suggest DSLRs. It sounds like you don't want to be carrying around a big camera if you're living in one bag. I'd suggest a compact system camera like the Olympus PEN a Sony NEX a Panasonic LX7 or a Nikon 1.
You won't get the exact same quality as a DSLR, but the size is 1/3rd that of which you'd have to carry on your back, and they will certainly take good pictures.
Enjoy Asia, and if you come out to Taiwan, send me a message!
Might want to look into an EOS-M at that budget.
No problem at all I used a canon eos m with the kit 22mm pancake lens. Shown here http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B008NENG1A/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420582355&sr=8-1&keywords=eos+m2
You could get a GH3, however that wouldn't leave you much money left over for a lens, let alone all the other bits you need.
The camera is one of three parts that make up a quality production; you also need to consider sound and lighting.
If you're just experimenting, then you could go for this little combination:
That leaves you about $40 for media and spare batteries. The links are for illustrative purposes - shop around to find better prices and you can save even more!
Starts at $1,900 too. http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U/
Yes, go for the full frame. I wish I had begun this way. Full-frames have various advantages. For example, you will have more flexibility with the lenses you can use. I love my 85mm 1.8 for portraits, but with a crop sensor, I would have to back up too far from my subject. Same for the 50mm 1.4, which I use for live performances. Full frames are also better in low light.
Canon and Nikon both have excellent full frames. I'm curious about the new Canon 6D, which looks like a great deal: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1368909139&sr=1-1&keywords=canon+6d
Sony 3N kits are extremely cheap ($245 refurb'd: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00BF9MUBM/ref=dp_olp_refurbished?ie=UTF8&condition=refurbished)
They're my go-to recommendation for anyone looking to "step up". The controls are very simplistic for anyone coming from a compact camera, it's got a TINY size, and the image quality is on par with all the other budget DSLRs and mirrorless cameras.
Plus, despite owning 5-figures worth of DSLR gear, I think DSLR systems are going the way of the dinosaur and will become a high-end and niche market in the near future (a la MF and LF cameras).
You can probably get the Sony RX100 M2 used for under $400. I have one as my point and shoot option and I love it.
no, an iphone can not do this.
There is obviously some background defocus (also called shallow depth of field or "bokeh") and some editing going on (lifted shadows to give it a faded look, also some color correction done). The app VSCO can give you these kinds of effects for free, but you can pretty much do this with any free and easy to use image editor on any device.
You should probably get a small mirrorless camera that is easy to use.
Depending on how much you want to spend and how serious you are about photography, here are some choices.
Fixed Lens Cameras (no interchangeable lenses):
Now some interchangeable lens cameras:
As you can tell: there are a lot of choices.
If you are new to photography and not interested in buying lenses, go with a fixed lens camera like the RX100. You can get the first or second gen version for less than 400$ and its very compact! It should give you similar photos, especially if you zoom all the way in (results in more background defocus, its used to separate the background and the subject).
Here is a link to amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00DM8R866/ref=olp_tab_all
and here are some nice sample images of the RX100:
https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=interestingness-desc&text=rx100%20portrait
hope this helps!
I would recommend you go with the GH5 and a nikon to mft metabones speedbooster. The GH5 has a lot of features that the other cameras you mentioned just don't have that you would want for run n' gun shoots. Rugged splash/freeze/dust proof body, in body image stabilization, dual sd card slots, 4k at 60p, and more. The speedbooster would allow you to use your nikon lenses on the GH5 and get an extra stop of light. This would get you a great camera setup for roughly $2.5k which would allow you to spend the budget on any needed accessories like a monopod and since I do not see that on your list and I would think it would be a very useful addition.
I like the other users idea of taking her to a camera store to try out some different type of cameras to see what she likes best in terms of feel and weight. I'm a mirrorless guy, so I'm going to recommend the Sony A5000, it's $350 new on Amazon with kit lens, and she can purchase cheap $12 adapters to use any old lens if she wants to experiment. Check our /r/sonyalpha if you end up going down the sony route if you have any questions.
Awesome, I'll be heading to Kyoto as parter of a larger Asia trip this May and am looking into some mirrorless camera options. If you don't mind...do you have any thoughts on those? Seem to be compact and some of them closer to my price point of $300 or under.
These are some options I have lined up.
Samsung NX300
Sony Alpha a5000
[Olympus PEN E-PL6] (http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL6-Digital-Camera-14-42mm/dp/B00VNW5ALS/ref=sr_1_9?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1453632628&sr=1-9&keywords=mirrorless+camera)
Thanks for your initial response, no worries if you don't have time for my questions.
The S II is only a 12MP camera... so if you're frustrated by resolution now....
A7R II http://amzn.to/2juRlHL plus a rokinon 24mm 1.4 makes an awfully nice star shooter - and an everything else shooter.
Phones are still a good starting place unless you need the advantages of a stand-alone camera. Do you need anything that your phone photos are currently lacking?
What's your budget?
I would look into something like the Nikon D3400 with the kit zoom lens and maybe an optional 50mm f/1.8 lens for product shots.
I will try to keep this short and to the point even though your question is quite in depth.
What is vlog? Its a Video blog. There are various types of vlogs. Some youtubers like shaytards and casey neistat are really good storytellers. So they post their day to day lives online sharing interesting parts of their day. What are the unexpected challenges of making vlogs? For many you tubers who vlog without setting boundaries and respecting those boundaries have ended up in broken relationships. 2014-2016 I have seen some long time you tubers (some who have been doing it from 2006) ended up separating or divorced because of this. So choose wisely.
What camera to use? The nikon d7000 you have is a good starting camera for entry level video Production. But it is not a good vlogging camera when you are starting out. It is too heavy for the initial vloggin application.
Any one of the three cameras that she wants would suffice for her application. I currently use the sony rx100 mVI. This is my recommended list for vlogging cameras. If you have good budget.
the list below might be an over kill. But will allow for her to grow into higher production value in the long term.
Make sure you get a gorilla tripod or a flexible tripod that she would find it easy to carry around and also a ton of third part batteries. You can find them cheap on amazon.
For video editing. I would suggest starting with Sony vegas movie suite. http://amzn.to/2gHJoua
This is what I started on after doing Movie maker for years. It has plenty of built in tutorials with guided editing within the application. So you would learn some advanced techniques. This will prepare the mind for other complex systems like hit film final cut and adobe. Sony’s editing software is really robust. they are just not good at marketing it well.
Hopefully I answered all your questions. If I missed something or if you need clarification do not hesitate to reach out. Good luck!
If you don't mind going used, Amazon warehouse has 20% off.
The A7RII is $1397 -20% = 1117
​
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Full-Frame-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-ILCE7RM2/dp/B00ZDWGFR2/
Sony A7RII I love this camera!
I would probably suggest the Nikon D3400 for ~$500, you can save some cash and buy used through Amazon though. Eventually you'll want to get a better lens for low light photos, but it will still blow you iPhone away because of the larger sensor.
If you end up going with the D3400, Tony Northrup has a one hour YouTube tutorial. If you go with something else, he has tutorials for most cameras on his channel.
Once you have a camera with manual controls, for a good general overview of how to control exposure using light, aperture, shutter speed, and ISO; take a gander at this 14 minute YouTube tutorial.
I also wholeheartedly recommend Tony Northrup's book, Stunning Digital Photography. Starting at $10 for the ebook, available on his website or Amazon. Some of the videos from the book are available for free on their YouTube channel, such as the ones I posted above.
The book eases into the technical knowledge while teaching about composition and lighting, which apply to all types of photography. Then they have genre specific chapters for landscapes, night, portraits, and more.
At a 300 price point you're basically working with higher-end point and shoot cameras. If your limit isn't a hard one, consider purchasing this. Mine has performed admirably down here through summer and winter.
Amazon(+ grip)has them for cheaper, but if you know this one is of superior quality and has been taken care it may be worth it. Seems a slightly overpriced for a camera made in 2008, unless they throw in a lens. (and TBH the 4gb card is not worth much and sync cables, charger, battery are standard).
Unless you need the weather sealing of the 50D (i.e. heavy rain/snow/sand) you can go with something like a NEW T6 and get a lens or a NEW Nikon D3400 with lens
edit: I also want to point out while the stock lenses are good for most environments you might also want to save/get some additional lenses (used lenses are a great option).
The Nikon D3400 has Bluetooth, and would be a fantastic entry level camera. As this is a current model, you probably won't find many used, but it's relatively inexpensive ($400 for basic kit on Amazon).
I started with the D3100 and moved up to a higher model body. It'll do all of the core DSLR type photos you want, then you can decide to upgrade when the time is right. I'm sure there is a comparable Canon model as well.
If I'm correct (I'm a Canon guy), I believe the D3400 just came out recently, so that is why you haven't seen any sales.
On Amazon, the price of the D3400 with a kit lens is $500, which is a pretty decent sale from the $649 it came out with a few months ago.
As to whether to get the D3400 or the D5200, I wouldn't know as I am not very familiar with Nikon.
$300 is honestly really low, but there are some great deals this Cyber Monday for the entry-level cameras, like the Nikon D3400 w/ 18-55mm and 70-300mm lens: https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1511803634&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=d3400%2Bnikon&th=1
I chose this over the basic 18-55mm kit because its currently on 50% discount
No sé cuál es tu presupuesto, pero por Amazon Global te podés traer alguna sin mucho lío, yo compré a fines del año pasado una Nikon d3400, y si sos team Canon hay un bundle con la EOS Rebel T6 a $449.00 + $196.06 (envío).
El plus de la Nikon es que trae 2 lentes, ahora sale $546.95 + $163.27 (envío), yo la pague como 50 dólares menos, supongo que si no tenés apuro podés estar al tanto de cuando salga alguna oferta y recién ahí entrarle.
En camel podés hacerle un seguimiento del precio, y por lo que veo, 496 fue el mínimo y se ve que le pegué justito :D
The 3300 is a very solid choice. If you can an extra 100 bucks for the 3400 then go for the 3400. The 3400 has wireless capability which comes in handy more often than you think. And the one I linked includes the Nikkor 70-300mm long lens which is actually a pretty decent kit lens.
Also take a look around for used gear. I've seen some slightly used 5500 for around 500. Check Facebook and Craigslist for some deals.
I'm looking at a few different suggestions for you right now for other gear, but if you're serious about the A6500, it's on sale at amazon for $1200 right now: https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B01M586Y9R
Thought you might want to know, I'll post some other idea if I have time.
In stock just about every where else
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1289585-REG/sony_alpha_a6500_mirrorless_digital.html
http://www.adorama.com/isoa6500.html
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B01M586Y9R/
Thanks for the follow!
This was shot with a Canon 70D with a Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM Lens.
That said, I have some additional thoughts on gear. You truly can't go wrong with any Canon, Nikon, or Sony kit these days. My camera is 5 years old, and I've been looking to upgrade for a while now. The successor is the 80D for $1k. It's a great mid-level crop sensor DSLR that has some sensor improvements over the 70D. The 90D is supposedly coming later this year too.
If I wasn't already invested in Canon lenses though, I'd take a hard look at Sony. The a7iii just came out and has some really impressive specs at a decent price. It's $2k for just the body, which is a bit over your budget. Sony also tends to charge less for the body and more for the lenses than Canon, so in some price comparisons they can seem cheaper. a6500 is within your budget, with room to buy a lens or two. I'd recommend going to a camera shop or somewhere where you can get your hands on the gear and see what you like and dont like. A couple times a year Mike's Cameras brings a ton of gear to the Denver Zoo and lets people try it all out. That'd be a good event to check out.
Hope that helps!
I'll try not to write twenty pages but I usually look up or contact the venue just to double check their rules. Some venues, usually smaller ones, don't even require a pass and you can just bring a camera. In my experience tho the venue relies on the artist for a guest/press list.
I usually contact the artist's manager/tour manager - you can usually find that info on their website, facebook or just google it - and I do this 1-3 weeks out from the show. Also good to mention that if they're not the person to contact, if they could point you in the right direction that's great. Usually people will ignore you but I've accidentally contacted a marketing guy or an old manager that put me in touch with the right guy because of that.
You really don't need to say much. A basic template, and it can be even less, would be like:
> hi my name is eirtep. I am a [city]-based [music journalist/photographer whatever]. I am requesting a basic photo pass to [band's] [date] show at the [venue] in [city]. I've shot a number of shows at this location and I'm familiar with the layout and rules. I do not use a flash or lights and only seek access to the photo pit for photo/video.
> [optional sentence or about other relevant bands shot (related to band asking about or the venue or whatever you have + links to these examples, if possible, that they won't bother to look at]
> More examples of my work can be found at [website that they wont look at]
> [optional sentence asking if anyone would like a copy of the finished work in return for the press pass and proper credit - had a few IG and FB posts from this]
> Please let me know if I am contacting the wrong people.
as for #2, it's highly dependent on your budget. Youtube and subs like /r/videography and /r/filmmaking are helpful to learn. considering I shot my first show on a shitty old Canon T2i I think you'll be ok as long as you don't go too cheap. A fast lens, like f1.8 or ideally f1.4 is more important than the camera since it's probably dark in the venue. Plus lenses (usually) stay with you, I've been through multiple camera bodies but I've kept my lenses. I currently shoot on a Pansonic GH5 which is fairly cheap as far as cameras go. It's more of a video camera than a stills one, but I'm a more video-guy so that's fine for me. The Sony A7sii is a low light beast so I could see that being good.
No one's gonna judge you for your shitty camera, you have the pass so ppl assume you're supposed to be there, because you are.
All that being said you can also just shoot at more low key/local act venues to get a feel for shit and to have "examples." Also, once you should like 1 show you can automatically say you've shot like 4 bands because of the openers and shit. It helps you have a blog to say you're working for. Though maybe it's in my head, but I feel i've had better luck just using the word "photo" pass instead of "press." it's the same thing, but maybe they're worried about a bad review/write up? I dno.
hope that helps a bit.
I've been glued to this subreddit since September soaking up all the information possible as the filming process began.
So we shot this with a Lumix GH5 with a 12mm-35mm lens. We had the camera on a JOBY GorillaPod but we couldn't get any sort of tape (Gaff, Duct etc) to get it to stick to the dashboard. So for the front angle we used the legs of the pod and hung it from the rear view mirror and shot the skit upside down. We put the lens on the widest setting and put it on auto focus.
For audio we used a Zoom H4n Pro. We placed it on a little stand resting on the center console on the 120 setting. All audio was captured on the day, none of it is ADR.
The biggest challenge in the edit bay was the fact that some takes we're done when the car was at a red light while some we're in motion. We had a 6 mile loop which we drove over and over and we just ran through the skit multiple times not really paying attention to whether we were moving or stopped. It was 48 minutes of footage cut down to 2:19 of actual skit.
As far as my involvement went, I co-wrote, acted, captured audio and edited the skit. I'm the guy in the blue shirt riding shotgun (Dane) for reference.
Would love any feedback, thoughts, or advice!
Broken down:
I will end on this note: You like these videos because they are well shot, well composed, and well edited. I could hand you the best camera system in the world and you're going to make a shitty video if you don't know how to use it. Whereas I could hand a great cinematographer a crappy camera and he'd make something awesome. It's more about what you shoot than what you shoot with. With that in mind, the GH5 is fucking awesome (I just got mine) and it's a great tool to learn on and grow with.
If you want something a bit "time-proof" that won't become irrelevant and last you years right now I'd say the new Lumix GH5 that shoots 4k in camera, a good zoom lens for video, a Rode fuzzy mic, and spend the rest in extra batteries and the biggest, fastest SD cards you can find for cheap. Honestly right now I don't think you could find anything better in budget. You might look into the Sony A7sII but a good lens will run you more than it would for the lumix, battery life is worse. I'd check both setups locally and see what you like best and whatever leaves you some spare budget for the mic/batteries/SDs. And if you manage a cheap chinese LED video light might come in handy too. Hope this helps. :)
Are you outside US? Amazon shows $2k https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MZ3LQQ5/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_rB5BzbEW3JH50
Edit: remove unnecessary Amazon description
I used to use the sony X3000 for my BJJ tutorials before i upgraded to my GH5 .amazon referral links included. Sony looks good, better imo than the osmo, records in 4K and has nice stabilisation.
a step up in quality (and cost) would be to record audio separately and mix in post, or upgrade to a camera that can take a mic input
> what camera I should buy
That depends on your budget and what kind of photography you want to get into... if you just want to take snapshots of, say, your kid's birthday party then a good point-and-shoot camera, like this one would probably work fine. If, however, you want to get into more serious and specialized photography, you almost have to get a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex, which means you're looking directly through the lens when looking through the viewfinder), and that can run you anywhere from $500 to more than $2000 for the camera itself with no lenses. If you're wondering, I shoot with a Canon 40D and a Canon Rebel XSI. My father, also a Canon shooter and my main source of advice shoots with a Canon 7D.
> what lenses
Again, it depends on what kind of photography you want to get into. I shoot primarily airshows and birds, so I have two telephoto lenses (A Canon 400mm-L series lens and a Canon 70-300mm IS-USM lens). If I wanted to get into macro photography I'd have to invest in a macro lens, and if I wanted to get into, say, portraits, I'd have to invest in a fast portrait lens and also some decent lighting.
Shift6437 recommended /r/photography, but honestly this question gets asked so much over there you're likely to get a bunch of "this gets asked every week, lrn2search" responses. I'd suggest you take a look at /r/photoclass to get a handle on the basics of photography.
EDIT: Formatting
I think the Olympus Pen does the stitching in-camera, and some of the Sony cameras have the sweep-panorama mode.
My advice would be whatever you bring to peace corps don't expect to bring it back.
Lots of people use their iphones as a camera. I brought a nicer camera and was happy I did. I also used it as a teaching tool to teach my youth how to use a camera and let them take photos. So I guess think what you want to do with it and go from there.
This is what I bought http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL1-Interchangeable-Digital-Black/dp/B0035LBRJO/ref=pd_cp_p_2
It took great photos and videos
You're going about this all wrong: this is an opportunity to buy a new camera :-)
You could get a nice compact micro-4/3 camera that will fit in your Ortlieb Compact for $300 - $500. The sensor is not as large a DSLR (about 40% smaller), but the optics and electronics are generally comparable. I like the Olympus PEN E-PL1, which is only $260. The Panasonic Lumix is also well regarded.
Half are from a GoPro mounted to a telescopic pole from hardware store and the other half are from this camera.
I bought my wife an Olympus Pen E-PL1 last year for Mother's Day and she loves it. Our Sony point-and-shoot just wasn't cutting the mustard and cell phone pictures don't play well with high-energy toddlers who end up as blurs. It's not the nicest camera in the world, but it's a heck of a lot better than what we had and it's not nearly as complicated as a DSLR. I also got a screaming deal on it, with the camera, a spare battery, a 16GB memory card, and a case for under $325. My wife simply didn't want the complexity or the bulk of a DSLR and that camera is small enough that its case could easily fit in the diaper bag, beach bag, or even her purse.
I posted awhile back about upgrading from a point and shoot to a used four thirds for food photography. You all were super helpful, and I'm looking to make a decision in the next few days, so I thought I'd ask again about the options I'm looking at. I'm basically looking for under $200, with a lens included in that. Amazon would be ideal, because I have a gift card.
I have a few different PENs in my cart (E-PM1, E-PL1, E-PL2, E-PL3) as well as a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 and a Sony Alpha Nex-3.
I'm not married to those models, they're just the ones I found in the price range. I'm especially wondering: would the increased resolution of the NEX be noticeable? And even though they're all four thirds, do some have bigger/better sensors than others? Any advice or alternate recommendations much appreciated.
Edit: I do care about it being able to do video.
I posted about a week ago, about the same question. I got a few good replies. The one I went with was this Olympus PEN E-PL1 I just got it yesterday, but I love it so far. It is compact, has an interchangeable lens, "Can grow with you" is what the person said. It is also cheap enough that you can either afford another lens or whatnot. It doesn't come with an SD card however, but those are about 20-30 bucks. I bought a travel case also. Total investment so far is 250.
It is much more powerful than a point and shoot, yet not overly complicated or large.
Just what I was looking for. I'd say minimally do some research on it!
I'm guessing amazon decided to be a creeper after I was searching for this camera for you...so I figured I'd share what they emailed me with. best deal ive seen on the s95 (so far at least...I'm not looking too hard lol). And this one might be the newest model in that series. I stand by the canon power shots because they've always been better than the nikon point and shoot cameras (even though I'm bred to be a Nikon DSLR kid)...and I assume having HD video is great. I'd go into a store to experience the audio quality first hand though.
Edit: typos
EditEDIT: Basically what you want are manual controls so you can handle low light situations (that 2fstop option is NICE) and a lot of flexibility with exposure while still maintaining a quality image. I know jack shit about sound but from what I understand the video capabilities on DSLRs and possibly point and shoots (esp like this one) are getting better and better as time goes on. Plus its a tiny, lightweight model...safer and easier to bring to events without breaking it.
For the Canon s95, do you mean this?
Your help is more appreciated than you know!
I would recommend the Canon s95. Its a high end point and shoot which can shoot raw, f/2.0, M, AV, TV (etc) modes, 720p HD video recording and just overall is a very solid P & S. Regrettably Amazon JUST had a sale on them for $220 but they normally go for $300. Here is a link to Amazon and its reviews:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-S95-Stabilized-3-0-Inch/dp/B003ZSHNGS/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1324359321&sr=1-1
400+ reviews 4.5 stars, cant go wrong with this camera
There are some good point and shoot cameras on the market. But a lot of them have a problem with low light shooting. I settled on the Canon S95 after trying several other Powershots. Been happy.
Canon S100 looks good too.
Video
>12X optical point and shoot with amazing low-light performance.
That pretty much disqualifies zooming on every P & S camera. Typically zoom lenses have a max aperture of f5.6 or greater at the longest end. This problem is made worse by the tiny sensor built into p&s cameras.
Also...
Audio
>the mic was crap and you couldn't hear anything over the amazing bass (I heard a paper tape over the mic can help in these cases!).
Sound pressure at concerts is way too high for clear audio on the built in mic of any p&s or even a DSLR camera. To record clear audio during a show you'd could try getting an external digital recorder (like a Zoom H1 audio recorder), record the audio and video separately, then re-sync them in your video editing software. See what I'm talking about >HERE<
I figure you want a p&s to keep your setup small, discreet, and allowable at a concert venue, so all DSLRs are out in this reccomendation.
So, what you'll need to do is this:
Note* - If you must zoom, you need to stabilize the camera (preferably a tripod or monopod). If you cant use either cause of the venue, then tuck your arms against your body tight, and hold the camera with two hands. In any case, your video is still gonna look like crap if it's zoomed, grainy (cause the camera will raise the ISO to try get a decent exposure), and jerky (cause your holding the camera with one arm above the crowd).
Well if you want to stay in the same line, the 60D is ~$880
Or there's the T3i for ~$670
Both still use EF and EF-S lenses, so your existing lens will work just fine on either.
e: I have the 60D and love it - the articulated LCD alone is quite helpful, but the T3i has that as well - my main decision maker was the button layout and feel of the camera - I liked holding the 60D much more, and thought the button layout made more sense.
No problem! You can buy an adapter for the G7 which will let you use Canon lenses, but you'll lose some functions, such as reliable autofocus. But otherwise there are plenty of G7 lenses that you can get for pretty cheap.
MagicLantern is a 'hack' that will enable the 60D to record RAW video at a resolution of 1734x976, which is not even 1080p.. Whereas on the G7, you can record 3840x2160 (4k) video without having to hack it, obviously.
I'd say go for the G7, and definitely not the 60D, which is by the way still more expensive.
The Sony RX100 has a great reputation as a budget video camera, but it's a point & shoot so it might not make the best option depending on what you want to teach. I think you can get a couple of Canon 60Ds on your budget if you want to teach camera-work specifics.
Do you want to teach cinematography or storytelling? For camera specifics, you might want to shop for more sophisticated cameras than the RX100. If you want to teach storytelling techniques, then you don't need a 60D for video; just about any smartphone will do. Depending on the smartphone, a few 60Ds may be cheaper. :)
Thanks for the info. The point A and B will be close to the same focal plane.
Someone recommended this camera:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y/
or the more expensive:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B0040JHVCC
Do you have any favorites?
$148 new on Amazon - Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS 12.1 MP and even has a high speed mode. I love this thing to death.
This one gets good reviews. Looks like it has good video performance for you, too.
Canon 300hs does 240fps @ 240p. Yeah lower resolution but it's less than $200 new.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDoARCLMnXQ&amp;feature=player_embedded
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1335293499&amp;sr=8-1
How about the [Sony Alpha a6300] (https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1472869697&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=sony+a3600&amp;linkCode=ll1&amp;tag=vidred-20&amp;linkId=c0fefcff27832968b15cbf24e45589be) It really matches up to the sony a7 s2 and has a good budget
Hi all,
I've been shooting on my nikon D3200 for almost 4 years now, and I think I'm ready for an upgrade.
My uses are typically landscapes and various nature shots including some macro stuff, in addition to some video here and there, as well as some astrophotography.
Unfortunately my budget is still very low. I can't really afford full frame anything, so I'm staying away from that for now.
My question is, what is a logical step from here?
Is it worth it to upgrade? Should I just hold out with my d3200 until I can upgrade to a full frame from Nikon or Canon?
The cameras I've been looking at are all mirrorless, I've been looking at offerings from Sony and Fujifilm
Namely the Sony a6300 and the Fuji X-T20
I hoping any of you could point me in the right direction
Thank You!
TL;DR Looking for a mirrorless replacement for my Nikon D3200 any help is appreciated
Just recently started getting into photography because of how influential it is in design (so please take what I say as a grain of salt). To start things off, photography in general is more equipment heavy than graphic design I will say. A lot of people will argue that you can replicate any photo style on any camera, but I typically disagree with this.
With that being said, price points can also be a be a bit subjective and relate with your experience level. A professional might consider a $1,500 lens to be cheap, while newcomers might find spending $1,000+ on a full kit to be expensive.
I might be a bit biased as it was the first camera I've ever bought, but I personally love Sony cameras! While Cannon, Nikon and Pentax have made names for themselves, Sony is quickly catching up with their market. In general, Sony's line of cameras are extremely universal, with their e-mount lenses the possibilities are endless. They've even provided lens adapters for many of the top camera companies, if you ever wanted to buy additional lenses.
My first camera was a Sony A6000, and I highly recommend it as a beginner level camera! They have a more updated Sony A6300, but it's entirely up to you and what you plan on using it for.
Do you have a lot out experience with cameras? If not jumping straight into a DSLR may be a bit overwhelming.
Also, as the dad of a 1.5 year old, I can say that such a large camera is not always practical, nor is the sound of the shutter. Beside setup shots, you're not going to easily be able to hold the camera for a quick "selfie" of your baby sleeping on you. it's a specific example, but a lot of situations will come up where such a large/somewhat loud device will hinder you.
Consider down the road, after the first 3-6 months of house arrest, you'll want something light and small that you can carry around top of all the other baby gear, and that your kid isn't going to immediately want to play with instead of having their picture taken. I probably would have missed some of my best shots if I didn't have such a small camera that is unobtrusive and easy to carry for sort walks to the park or other situations where I would be discouraged in bringing a big SLR.
I wanted to get a DSLR to replace my s/o's point and shoot a few months back but I decided to wait on the investment and bought a Panasonic Lumix LX7. I couldn't be happier.
The lens is amazing, having a very wife aperture which allows for great indoor low-light photos--the main reason i wanted a new camera. Not every photo has an instant amazing pop of modern DSLRs, but if I stop and think about the shot the results are outstanding for a $300 camera
I mostly use aperture priority, turn the aperture ring appropriately for the scene, and go to town, but the auto mode is smart enough to be able to hand to anyone. The movie button will begin recording with your current settings so you don't have to switch the dial to movie mode. It will shoot raw+jpeg so you can share the photo instantly while having an archive quality version. And if youre willing to learn to do some post processing when you have time (in a couple years maybe? Harhar), 60 seconds of adjusting in Lightroom will really bring out the quality of the camera and make for great prints. You'll also be able to save photos that you thought were incorrectly exposed or have too much contrast.
In the end the best camera is the one you'll actually have with you all the time. And when you eventually decide to step up to the SLR, the technology will have greatly increased for your price range and you'll still have a great backup.
I have to go to work and would love to badly type more on my phone, but if you have questions about my experience lemme know.
Here's some reviews:
http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/03/25/leica-d-lux-6-panasonic-lx7/
http://blog.entropicremnants.com/2013/03/08/virtue-in-downsizing--panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx7-compact-camera-review.aspx
I bought mine on amazon for $280 "used" from warehouse deals. The minor damage described was only on the box. The prices seem to have gone back up a bit though. I would suggest square trade insurance for whatever camera you buy.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B008MB719C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1370800161&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=SL75
The 5n has no mic input, do you want sound?
For that budget I would definitely go with with the Eos-M and 22mm lens because of its mic input and fast lens. You can find one used on Amazon for under $250. Be sure to update to the latest firmware for better autofocus or use the Magic Lantern firmware for expanded functionality.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B008NENG1A/ref=sr_1_3_olp?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1458002627&amp;amp;sr=8-3&amp;amp;keywords=Eos-m&amp;amp;condition=used
A Canon 6D.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U
When I was getting started, I started with a DSLR that was not a full-frame camera. A year later, and being someone who's very into portraiture as you will be, I had to upgrade to a full-frame sensor. I wish I had started with something higher-level that I could grow into, instead of something entry-level, that I grew out of. Now I have two cameras...but one of them doesn't get much use at all.
The 6D has most of the features that the 5d Mark iii has, but costs less. It's pro-sumer camera. It's a tiny bit more expensive than what you're looking to spend. But it'll be worth it.
If sensor size isn't a major concern, you could, however, take a completely different tack. Photography isn't much about the camera. You're going to need to learn about many things before you'll really know what you want in a camera. Since you're doing still photography, you could learn with an older, used DSLR, for about $100. Then, once you have a better idea for what it is you need, functionally, you can spend that big wad of cash burning a hole in your pocket.
The guys at DigitalRev did a good video about this.
http://youtu.be/T4ZvAFCt5Sk
The temptation, at the beginning, is to think that a better camera will get you better pictures (I was under that misconception myself for a very long time). While this is sort of the case, what's actually true is that knowing how to take good photos is what really matters, and you can do that with some VERY inexpensive gear.
Using DSLRs as a example.
A Canon 6D is 20.2 megapixels.
To that you can use a Canon 50mm lens for $125 or you could use a Zeiss 50mm lens for $615, both are still going into 20.2MP sensor.
Or, that Canon 6D is $999 before you get a lens, or you could get this Canon Powershot point and shoot for $209. Both are 20.2MP, but one's definitely takes a hell of a lot better pictures than the other.
I'm running a Rebel XT from 2005. I currently have the 18-55 EFS kit lens, a 75-300 EF lens, a 50mm prime EF Lens and a Sigma 24mm Super-wide II lens.
Assuming I could only buy one or the other, would I be better served by getting the 24-105mm L IS USM lens here;
or the Canon 6D here?
the mark ii is discontinued now, the next gen is the mark iii, but i'd recommend the 6d at this point. You can look up the prices for them on amazon, but for the lazy:
canon 6d
5d mark ii
I'm looking to buy a Canon 6D that is slightly used. I was looking at third party sellers on Amazon and there are some great deals, but these sellers have little to no ratings. Is it best to avoid these altogether and buy from someone who has a lot of ratings?
Here are the deals:
I love my Sony NEX 3N. It's so compact but takes beautiful shots and allows for a lot of adjustable settings that mimic a much bulkier DSLR. Can also buy other lenses. I do a ton of hiking in difficult terrain for my research and it's so easy to throw in a small case. Battery life also superb. takes great video too. https://www.amazon.com/Sony-NEX-3NL-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B00BF9MUBM/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1499790290&amp;sr=1-2&amp;keywords=sony+nex+3n
I would have to agree with avoiding the DSLR and just going for a Mirrorless camera. You basically get the full performance of a DSLR, but much smaller and lighter weight. Unless you are going to be taking action sports shots at night with autofocus, there is really no disadvantage.
In fact, there is a large advantage to going with a Mirrorless Sony Camera; You can put basically any lens you find on it with a cheap ($15-$35) adapter. This means you can learn about lenses and photography with whatever you find at garage sales, antique malls, and ebay listings without having to invest a lot of money. I currently have 6 different lenses, that are all excellent, that all together cost less then 1 lens of the cheapest variety for a DSLR.
Check out this Sony NEX-3N. It is small enough to fit in your pocket, yet is just as powerful (if not more) than any comparably priced DSLR.
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-NEX-3NL-Compact-Interchangeable-Digital/dp/B00BF9MUBM/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1375710866&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=Sony+NEX+3n
EDIT: I forgot to mention that the NEX-3 line is completely geared towards beginners in the fact that it has Help Tips for every single setting on the camera explaining why you would want to change the setting, and when it is most important.
1st Gen - Amazing Photos and Video. $340 Used / $500 New
2nd Gen - APV + MultiShoe + Wifi and PlayMemories. $480 Used / $650 New
3rd Gen - APV +WPM + EVF - MultiShoe. $730 Used / $800 New
Keep in mind that that camera has a very wide lens, so everything you shoot will have a fisheye effect. I personally recommend something like a [Sony RX100 Mk 2](Sony DSCRX100M2/B 20.2 MP Cyber-shot Digital Still Camera (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DM8R866/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_wH1yybWV7GDW7) or a similar point and shoot. Obviously for action stuff this is not ideal but the quality will be way better for the vlogs and other normal things. PLUS, that camera takes amazing stills (if you're interested in that).
I'm looking for a camera that would be decent for starting to capture my life.
My husband and I are going on our honeymoon and I figured this would be a great time to think about investing in a good camera so I can start capturing memories. Here are some things I am looking for :
I was taking a look at this after reading a little bit of the buyers guide. I would read it further but it just seems a little too technical for me. Thanks in advance for any replies :)
I always carried a Sony RX100M2 with me before the N5 went on sale. My cheap Chinese MediaTek phone was never reliable. The camera is decent for quick shots.
About the tweeter app, try using Talon. There are some new ones like Fenix, and the oldie Falcon.
i have this sony camera, but i just dont wanna carry it around. i bring it with me on special occasions only
just the phone is super convenient.
The camera that fits your needs best is the Canon 70D
It has best Video functionality and best Video and image auto focus system of DSLRs in its price range. With CANONs STM lenses it has the quietest autofucos motor, ideal video.
Canon 70D vs Nikon D7100 Epic Shootout Comparison…: http://youtu.be/bOM4r1gxsbs
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC
Canon EOS 70D Hands-on Review (filmed with a 70D): http://youtu.be/btaesOmA_ro
I personally have owned the 70D since it launched last year and can testify to the cameras spectacular image quality and ease of use for everything from casual shooting to serious photography. And have shot dozens of hours of video using both Canon STM and traditional USM motor and the difference in the noise level between the two type is not huge but noticeable.
The next best option on a budget would be the Nikon D5300
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00FY3T3TM/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1419056374&amp;sr=8-2&amp;pi=AC_SX200_QL40
I'd recommend getting a 35mm or 50mm Prime lenses for either camera its a cheap lense that produces amazing pictures.
Hope this helps Good luck
The shoe camera is just a cheap point and shoot (cheap as in ~$400). The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Although I blurred the background since I had a personal e-mail account opened on the screen and my name was on there. So that post-effect Photoshop blur might make it look nicer because that is causing a possible faux Depth of Field look.
The main photo was taken in studio with a Canon EOS 70D ~$1000 for the body alone. Coworker took the photo as it's a camera for work. Although I do a lot of video, etc. in my free time as well. I'm likely buying the Panasonic GH3 soon.
Yes. https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G/ref=sr_1_4?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1467316479&amp;sr=1-4&amp;keywords=sony+a5000 and this https://www.amazon.com/Camdive®-Waterproof-Underwater-Housing-16-50mm/dp/B013OX0UY0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1467316508&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=sony+a5000+underwater+housing for $600 roughly.... Solid camera and housing and I bet you can get better deals than this, I didn't even tr to look and am from UK too.
Is your moon criteria because you want to be able to zoom really far or that you feel only decent cameras can do that? I ask because if you don't need a long reach you could put more money toward a better camera/lens that's shorter.
If you don't need long reach and want a small camera a used RX100 will give you great quality for stills and video for under $400. You mention travel so I think for walking around it's great. It's a fixed lens though so you can't get more out of it down the line.
If you're thinking of it more like an investment and you'll grow into it over time you'll probably want to go with an ILC (interchangeable lens camera). Mirrorless will be smaller DSLR will be bigger. Just know that you're buying into a whole ecosystem because because lenses aren't swapable between brands. There are adapters but generally you lose things like auto focus unless you pay big bucks for an adapter.
For DSLR a used Nikon D3300 or Canon T6 is under $400. For mirrorless a used Sony a5000. There's also the micro 4/3's mirrorless systems but someone else would have to chime in for recommendations as I have no experience w/ them.
I should note that all my specific recommendations don't have a ton of reach (can't get far subjects). But what you save on that gets you incredible quality if you take the time to learn. Also w/ the ILC cameras you could get a telephoto lens in the future. You could get a cheaper body and get a kit that has 2 lenses one of which is a telephoto - used Nikon D3100 Kit or used Canon T5 kit for right at $400. You have to swap lens to go long. If you really want that zoom for cheaper or smaller overall size probably look at choices in this article.
That said if you're going to stay on auto mode all the time my recommendations are probably not worth the price premium since you won't get the most out of it. Save some bucks and get a point and shoot that's easier to travel with and you're more likely to take out and use. I will say the quality gap between camera phones and point and shoots is pretty minimal these days. You probably need to spend $300-$400 for the significant jump in quality.
Maybe one of the lower end Sony E-mount cameras?
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G
I've taken photos with a Sony NEX-3N, but the built in flash alone didn't quite cut it in dark areas.
goo.gl/vPnqge
> Panasonic GH4
Holy crap.
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4KBODY-16-05MP-Mirrorless-Cinematic/dp/B00I9GYG8O
Anyone have $1,700 I can borrow? I'll pay you back next week, promise.
It is this camera made by Panasonic.
Sorry, I'm not sure exactly what kind of information I needed to provide.
We will mainly shooting human faces. We would want as little lighting as we can get away with. The main source lighting will be a projector screen which may turn on and off. There will be minimal movement in the video. One issue we have with our current camera is that it takes a moderately long time for the camera to refocus after the projector light has turned back on.
Would something like this work?
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-Pixel/dp/B00DMS0GTC/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1377114008&amp;sr=1-1
$800 new, under $700 used. Fairly pricey but not that bad once you get into the context of high quality camera gear.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC
So I found a 70D on amazon for 779 from KEH, that is the right company you were suggesting right? https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/ol/B00DMS0GTC/ref=mw_dp_olp?ie=UTF8&amp;condition=all
Thank you. I currently shoot with a Canon 70d. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00DMS0GTC/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1395845698&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=SX200_QL40
For macro I use either the canon 100mm macro
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B002NEGTSI/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1395845750&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=SY200_QL40
or the Tamron 180mm macro.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0000AERK6/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1395845816&amp;sr=8-2&amp;pi=SX200_QL40
Most of the wider shots and room pictures are shot using a canon 17-55mm http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000EW8074?pc_redir=1395684481&amp;robot_redir=1
Fisheye shots are with the canon fisheye 8-15mm
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0040X4OZU/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?qid=1395845895&amp;sr=8-3&amp;pi=SX200_QL40
So I own a T3, and am looking into a body upgrade to do more fancy things like wireless shutters and mirror lockup. The T5i on Amazon is on sale for $600 (body only) while the 70D can be found for $1100 (body only) Given those prices, which is a better buy, and why?
I think so. As far as i know only the lower end "xxxD" models get rebranded as Rebels in the USA.
EDIT: Indeed Amzon USA has used 70D's for about 500-600 bucks: https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00DMS0GTC?ref_=dp_olp_all_mbc&amp;condition=all&amp;sa-no-redirect=1&amp;pldnSite=1
Be aware that thats just the body. For 650 there are some used 70Ds with a kit lens on Amazon. But that might blow your budget.
I'm having trouble choosing the correct camera for me. I am a student who travels a lot and want something powerful, yet portable. My choices so far:
-Sony DSC RX100 MI
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1411839797&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=dsc-rx100
-Sony DSC HX300/B
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00BEHRQB4/switctrave08-20
-Sony alpha a5000
http://www.amazon.ca/Sony-Alpha-Interchangeable-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G/ref=dp_ob_title_ce
Which one should I get?
Thank you in advance!
When I was in the market for my first "nice" camera without breaking the bank six months ago, the consensus seemed to be that the Sony NEX-3N is the best value in the under-$500 range. Having owned that camera since then, I can say it was worth every penny. With an APS-C sensor (same size as the pricier entry-level dSLRs) and a decent kit lens, I think camera takes pretty respectable pictures (here's one of my favorites, with a bit of RAW editing) and offers as much manual control as you want.
The low price comes at the expense of a few features found on more expensive cameras, perhaps most notably a viewfinder and hot shoe, though this has never really bothered me. I can tell that I'm going to enjoy these sorts of features when I'm willing to spend more on a camera, but in the meantime, I'm satisfied with the control and image quality I have now.
I know Sony has been revamping/replacing the NEX line recently—Amazon reports that the NEX-3N has been upgraded to the a5000, which offers a few more features for a bit more money—so it'd certainly worth doing some research to find the version that fits your budget and your needs. At any rate, I think the Sony mirrorless cameras fit the bill quite well in this price range.
Hey guys,
This is a rather beginner question as I have no idea about cameras. I have been using Sony a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00HNJWU3G) for almost 2 years now taking a lot of photos. I like it but it presents a problem when shooting wildlife or most specifically birds. I somehow ended up liking to take pictures of birds during bird watching so I need something that can help me accomplish this. Need to be able to zoom enough and take good quality pictures without having to go too close. Also would be nice if I can take pictures of birds while in flight.
&#x200B;
A friend of mine who knows about photography, camera and lenses told me that I need a telephoto zoom lens. He started explaining things about how I can go about making a decision but he used quite a few words I was not familiar with so I kind of lost him in the way.
He ended up suggesting to start with this lens: https://www.amazon.de/Sony-SEL-70300G-Tele-Zoom-Objektiv-Vollformat/dp/B01DLMD7DK which should fit my camera and see how that works for me and the photos I want to take.
The question I would like to ask is if this lens makes sense for my purposes. Are there any other alternatives I should consider? Also ... is photography geat this expensive normally? I was quite shocked to see the price tag.
Thanks for the thoughts MinkOWar! I'm a bit overwhelmed by the options. The more I look the more I think that an optical viewfinder is also a must as this will likely be used in very sunny environments. I wish I could find something just like the Sony Alpha a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HNJWU3G) with one. Considering the Olympus OM-D E-M10 maybe if I can find one? Looks a bit bulkier though, and my bigger issue then is how to pick an intro lens with it?
EDIT:
Maybe the Canon EOS Rebel T6 Digital SLR Camera Kit (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B01CO2JPYS) would be a decent choice? Don't love the look of it but that's getting picky.
> I wish I could find something just like the Sony Alpha a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HNJWU3G) with one.
NEX6/a6000/a6300/a6500 are that with an electronic viewfinder, at least.
Mirrorless with an optical viewfinder (through the lens, at least) doesn't work, that's the whole point of getting rid of the mirror :)
A fuji XPro1 or X100 series has a hybrid optical style viewfinder, somewhat more like a rangefinder.
Some of them were my phone, but the better ones (haha) were taken on a Sony a5100. It's compact and good if you're getting into photography a bit to start with. There are many similar cameras around now, but my husband did tons of research and chose this one (I'd need him to give the reasons why, but its been great!)
He gave it to me for my birthday in March 2015 and I've loved it so far...small enough to go in my purse and take out at bars/events...but great for trips and these landscape type photos. Good quality from its auto settings, but numerous capabilities for changing the settings when needed for a more manual experience. And interchangeable lens capabilities. A fun flip screen for selfies. :) And wifi capabilities to send pics straight to your phone/other device for quick sharing! Oh and it takes video.
It does not have a viewfinder, which is hard/not great for some types of photography.
:)
Newbie here. Looking for a good camera I can also take when I travel. Should I get the Sony Alpha a5000 or Sony DSC-RX100M III?
I was originally oogaling the DSC-RX100/B but the M III has the flip-up display which I want. It's also +$300 more than the /B. This Black Friday Ad shows the /B on sale for $50 off, which is a pretty piss-poor sale. But it shows the Alpha a5000 for $100 off, which is more appealing. Should I grab the a5000 or is the /B or M III much better?
Personally I would look at sonys a5000 or if you have extra money sony a6000 but thats what i would go for http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00HNJWU3G/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1449013555&amp;sr=8-1&amp;pi=SX200_QL40&amp;keywords=sony+a5000&amp;dpPl=1&amp;dpID=41JrglfjFGL&amp;ref=plSrch
This is a very good recorder and can go up to 4K- LUMIX
Honestly, for the price, look into mirrorless cameras like the current Sony alpha series or Panasonic lumix. They’re great cameras, I’ll link a few in a minute here.
Brands like Rokinon make fairly affordable lenses too.
Edit:
$500
$650
$1000
$1050
Seconding what the other commenter said about buying used. I have a Sony A7s ii that I picked up used for just under a grand and it’s been a great camera for both video and photo purposes. Saving up for a Panasonic GH5s next.
Just make sure you research the the camera best suited for what you’d like to do (video, photography) and make sure the lenses you get fit your camera body or you have an adapter (Sony uses E mount lenses and the Lumix cameras take G or micro 4/3s, for example). Get the right speed SD card (if you get a 4k camera - the write speed should preferably be higher than 95mbps) and figure out the kind of lenses best suited to you (zoom lenses are versatile, but prime lenses tend to have better aperture ranges and depth of field).
There are also tons of blogs and videos that can explain everything you need to know.
I have video gear for nikon, canon, blackmagic and panasonic lumix. And if i had to choose only one dslr camera, then I would choose the panasonic lumix gh4 with an adapter to ef-mount. The GH4 can shoot up to 96fps at 1080p! and it can also shoot 4K footage!
The gh4 is on sale right now at amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4KBODY-16-05MP-Mirrorless-Cinematic/dp/B00I9GYG8O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1418922267&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=gh4
Really? I checked amazon http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4KBODY-Mirrorless-Cinematic-Camera/dp/B00I9GYG8O
It's selling for $1497 new and starting at $1025 used
Thanks again, HybridCamRev.
Yeah, I suppose the difference between a $1k camera vs a $30k+ camera is quite substantial. I think you've convinvced me for the GH4, and it would be a much easier transition (given I still have to figure out how to tinker around with V-Log settings)
So you're saying get the GH4 with V-LOG. So not all GH4's have V-LOG built in? For example, the one on Amazon doesn't have V-LOG? And V-LOG is better to use over the Cinelike D that the GH4 has?
Isn't that much lower end?
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4KBODY-16-05MP-Mirrorless-Cinematic/dp/B00I9GYG8O
As a Youtuber who's invested in the wrong gear before the right gear, here's a quality list that I've found works for my needs and will likely be great for you.
Camera
Panasonic GH4: This is a great camera that shoots 4K. If you are shoot in 4K, downscale to 1080p, you have the option to reframe and zoom into a closer shot without losing quality. It has a flip out screen so you can see yourself, focus peaking to show you on screen if you're in focus, and can record longer clips (in select modes) than the Canon T3i to make syncing easier. This camera is also great for when you want to deliver in 4K one day.
$1699
AC Power adapter: No worrying about batteries for the indoor shooting. $20
Lens
Panasonic 12-35mm: Versatile lens that gives you great range. $1000
14-42 kit lens: Cheaper alternative. $120
Audio
Zoom H4N: Great recorder for your mics. Monitor each mic's level independently. $250
Rode NTG-2: Shotgun mic. $270
Sennheiser Wireless Lav: Expensive, but great quality. $640
Audio Technica ATR-3350s: Cheap corded lavs with long wires. $30
You'll need one long XLR cable, a light stand to use for the boom, and some kind of shotgun mic shock mount. $60 for all.
Lighting
3-light softbox kit: Great kit, been using it for a year with no issues. I don't use the over head light, as I don't have the space. I can use the light stand to boom or for another light. $170
Neewer CN-160: Small LED light to help light certain situations or to use as a hair light. $30
Tripod
Manfrotto Tripod w/Fluid Head: Great set up, worth the investment, but there are cheaper alternatives. $350
Memory Card
64GB Sandisk Extreme Pro: Great card which will allow for smooth 4K recording. $100
____
If you have any questions about any of this gear, let me know and good luck with everything!
https://www.amazon.com/PANASONIC-Mirrorless-Camera-Megapixels-DC-GH5KBODY/dp/B01MZ3LQQ5/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1542806343&amp;sr=1-1-spons&amp;keywords=lumix+gh5&amp;psc=1
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1028546-REG/panasonic_dmc_gh4_yagh_lumix_yagh_interface_unit.html
Top link is the GH5 4k camera, bottom link is a massive interface unit that has dual XLR inputs, SDI and HDMI outputs, and mounts to rails.
It's not full frame (only M4/3) but you can pick this up brand new with lens of your choice for under $3000
*The YAGH unit says it's for GH4, but is compatible with GH5
Panasonic GH4 is good because the GH5 just came out so the price dropped (affiliate link):
GH4: https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GH4-Mirrorless-Pixi-Starter-Accessories/dp/B011P2OVT2/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1494212793&amp;sr=1-3&amp;keywords=panasonic+gh4&amp;linkCode=ll1&amp;tag=firstvictory-20&amp;linkId=e9ab0ab727c547fddbdaf9c995622203
GH5: https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-LUMIX-Mirrorless-Camera-Body/dp/B01MZ3LQQ5/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1494212839&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=panasonic+gh5&amp;linkCode=ll1&amp;tag=firstvictory-20&amp;linkId=424ca275aedff0d2fe8c2786168aae81
Also if you want something smaller and more portable the Canon M5 mirrorless:
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-M5-EF-M-STM/dp/B01LWUQCED/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1494212888&amp;sr=1-3&amp;keywords=canon+mirrorless&amp;linkCode=ll1&amp;tag=firstvictory-20&amp;linkId=365707bbda43d24810828a3042d29492
Sony a7R ii with Sony Zeiss 55 f/1.8
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ZDWGFR2/ref=sr_ph?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1457213494&amp;sr=1&amp;keywords=a7r+ii
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-55mm-Sonnar-Frame-Prime/dp/B00FSB799Q/ref=pd_sim_421_6?ie=UTF8&amp;dpID=41Edmp8b1CL&amp;dpSrc=sims&amp;preST=_AC_UL160_SR160%2C160_&amp;refRID=0Z82SEMXM8F7KGJJ9S4H
Audio Technica AT2020+
the Sony a7R II looks sick
i believe he shoots full frame as well and with high end lenses so that helps. these arent iphone shots
yep just checked EXIF of recent photo. shooting with this:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Full-Frame-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-ILCE7RM2/dp/B00ZDWGFR2
3k plus quality lenses
Don't think anyone mentions the A7RII Deal on Amazon
Is this a good deal in 2019? I'm currently on a a6000, and have been wanting to upgrade,
Not sure if this is the chance, or if its not worth in 2019.
That's the Sony ALPHA a7sII
This is what I want for $800
I'm confused as can be about all these little variants on the Sony names myself.
EDIT: Wait, are these the same thing? WTF, now I am royally confused.
EDIT: Yeah. I'm fucking retarded. It's the A7rii is what I'm thinking.
Christ, that's an expensive camera. The quality didn't blow me away, either. Well, the high framerate stuff was really cool. Colors and clarity, less so. Guess it takes some tweaking to get the most out of.
Love the new mic, though. That was great.
What is the justification for the price increase on the second a7s II?
1.9k w/ lens- http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B00PX8CHO6/ref=sr_1_4?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1459222493&amp;sr=1-4&amp;keywords=sony+a7s+II
3k body only - http://www.amazon.com/Sony-ILCE7SM2-E-mount-Camera-Full-Frame/dp/B0158SRJVQ/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1459222493&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=sony+a7s+II
its $2,998 @ Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0158SRJVQ/
The price isn't too bad considering what you get. I'm currently in the market for a new DSLR and waiting for the release of the Note 8. The Sony A7S II is priced at $2700 just for the body and the Note 8 will probably be at around $800 upon release. That's $3500 I'm looking to drop on a phone/DSLR combo. I could buy the RED Hydrogen phone and still have money to spare for lenses and mods for the price of the A7S/Note combo.
SECTION | CONTENT
:--|:--
Title | MY GIRLFRIEND'S FIRST SKATEBOARD!!!
Description | CONTACT | STORE | BUCKET LIST: http://www.iamjohnhill.com/ SARA: https://www.youtube.com/saradietschy MUSIC IN ORDER: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9DxfsqUN-A https://soundcloud.com/lghthd (strange) Can't deny the good time I'm having with this peach(: NEW CAMERA: http://amzn.to/2lEBxQF NEW WIDE ANGLE LENS: http://amzn.to/2ljpfRz MIC: http://amzn.to/2mybAWG WIRELESS MIC: http://amzn.to/2ljowzG MIC RECORDER: http://amzn.to/2lELOMy POINT AND SHOOT CAMERA: http://amzn.to/2j7ftAs HANDLE: http:...
Length | 0:16:01
****
^(I am a bot, this is an auto-generated reply | )^Info ^| ^Feedback ^| ^(Reply STOP to opt out permanently)
Nikon D3400 with a 18-55 kit lens. Really decent for the very entry level photography https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE
If you're looking to buy new, you can take long exposure photos with any entry level DSLR. The Nikon D3400 or Canon EOS Rebel T6 are both great starting points (I pesonally like the Nikon a bit more). They usually run $450 - $600 dollars depending on the lenses they come with. They both have good ISO ranges (ISO is the sensitivity of the sensor to light) which means you would be able to take long exposures of things like stars or see detail in very dark places.
If those are out of your price range than I would look at used DSLR's like the Nikon D3300 or D3200. They aren't gonna handle low light quite as well as the newer cameras, and high ISO images will be noisier, but they will still easily take long exposures. And really any DSLR made in the last 8 years will be able to take long exposures. If you are trying to take long exposures of things like car trails one of those would work fine. If you are trying to take photos of things like stars I would try to get a newer DSLR.
Hey /r/Nikon,
I am getting ready to start photography, Ive been experimenting with friends/families gear for a bit and I have been looking at this deal :https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KITZKDE/ref=twister_B01MZXMN6T?_encoding=UTF8&amp;th=1
However, it looks like the lense that comes in the two lenses version of this deal for 100 bucks more is actually almost 400 dollars by itself. Would it be a good idea to just pick it up now for the extra 100?
Thanks!
Well, there are three cameras I am looking at
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE/
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B00I8BICB2/
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D5500-DX-format-Digital-18-55mm/dp/B00RUBJKU8/
They all look about the same, but are each $100 more than the other. I'm just wondering if the $700 is actually worth it over the $500 one. Right now I am using an older point and shoot.
This is what I'll be using the camera for, day light shots of costume stuff I make and sale, low light rave pictures of the tails, and my bunny. Examples https://img1.etsystatic.com/152/1/6870300/il_fullxfull.1179064823_t44d.jpg https://img1.etsystatic.com/149/0/6870300/isbl_3360x840.23609857_pgsttcxz.jpg http://i.imgur.com/d8AaqGE.jpg
You need a fast prime lens for selective focus and low light as well as a stepper-motor kit lens for videography and general work. A Sony a6000 with those lenses would not be easy to find anywhere near your budget. Otherwise a good choice. A good alternative would be the Nikon D3400 bundled with the AF-P kit lens (=silent focusing during video), which is on a fire sale now for $400, and then shop for a used Nikon 35mm f1.8G DX prime lens when you have a bit more cash ($150 or less). That combo would give you both 1080/60 and great low-light performance. Pass on Canons. The Canon T5i on up would be better for video (better focusing tech), but any Canon in your price range will be a much worse performer in low light. The Sony sensors in the Nikons are simply much better.
I've been looking to buy a new one. It has great reviews and it Nikon (IMO) is a solid brand.
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE
Is this camera good if I want to take nature shots? Will be used for hiking and backpacking(longer battery life needed).
I've been reading reviews and guides and I'm clueless. I would love to get a quality camera, but am hesitant to buy because I know so little. Other recommendations are welcome. Thanks so much!
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZKDE/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KITZKDE/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
First off; thank you so much for writing this post. It is very informative and i really appreciate the time you took to write this.
my first question is for the body. Should I go with the NIkon 7000 or take this bundle deal with the Nikon d3400. Otherwise I can't find a Pentax k5 for under 500
What are your thoughts on those? Once again thanks for your input
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-70-300mm-4-5-6-3G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=mp_s_a_1_5?keywords=nikon+d3400&amp;qid=1563904010&amp;s=gateway&amp;sprefix=Nkon+d340&amp;sr=8-5
I'd get this personally...
I'm a nikon user so I am bias though.
Nikon D3400 DSLR Camera with AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR and AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ywVXAbVTGNSP6
I got this bundle, plus a good monopod, tripod, UV filters, and a remote shutter. I have been shooting the same things you're interested in shooting and have been pleased with my pictures. I would also suggest an external flash, as that's my next purchase. All of this fell into your budget and is better quality than what you'll get in the big sets.
May be this type camera makes persons with dedication to professionals : https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-70-300mm-4-5-6-3G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=sr_1_49?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1495892494&amp;sr=1-49-spons&amp;keywords=camera&amp;psc=1
Hi.
I was hoping to get some input/advice on a plan to take photos of me proposing to my girlfriend. We are pretty big into backpacking and are going on a 2 day trip to the eastern side of the Sierras (Thousand Island Lakes area) at the end of the month. Just us and our dog, whom she is obsessed with, so he'll definitely have to be in the photo..
Since the place I plan to do it at is quite a ways onto the trail, I'm not seeing hiring someone as much of an option. I was thinking of buying a camera (D3400 or Rebel T6 both seem pretty reasonably priced at Costco/Amazon) and using the next month to try and learn a few things. I don't expect perfect photos, but decent would be nice.
The plan is to use the first day to take some practice couple shots at the location and then on the second day, run ahead and set up the camera to take shots automatically every second or so for a few minutes (I assume I can do this on the camera, but haven't checked yet).
I've seen some pretty cool photos of proposals in front of mountains but am curious about the lenses that would come with this camera and whether they would be suited for something like this?
Here's the camera I was thinking of: https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-70-300mm-4-5-6-3G/dp/B01KITZRBE/ref=sr_1_9?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1496806628&amp;sr=1-9&amp;keywords=dslr+camera
Thanks!
Can you link me to the Amazon product page for this? I can't seem to find it; I can only find this one, which is the same price as the D3500 with kit lens.
Looked into it abit, they seem nice but definitely on the higher end f the spectrum price wise, especially with some of the lens'.
Think I might pull the trigger on the d3400
I'm also considering this camera: https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3400-NIKKOR-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B01KITZRBE?th=1
This should get you started. The canon equivalent is here which will also work quite well. If you want you can add the 50mm f1.8 for either system which will give you beautiful portraits. Don't get your hopes up about indoor action though. Nothing in your price range is going to excel at that. I should note that lenses, and not cameras, are the biggest deciding factor in the quality of the results you will get.
Till 30000-35000 approximately. Please give me any alternate suggestion as well.
At the basic level, i am not able to find out what is the difference between cameras such as for example:
CANON EOS 1300D
and
NIKON D3400
and say
NIKON D5300
Looking to get my first DSLR camera. After some research I've concluded the D3400 is a good choice. How's the price looking? Is there any reason to wait
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KITZRBE
Thank you.
A6500 used on Reddit : $1150
A6500 NEW on Amazon : $1098
What, do you think you added value to it by using it??
Sony. get the A6500 and a sony lens. Maybe the 18-105 F4 if you really want that focal length coverage. That lens isint going to be great for low light but the 6500 is a low light beast. If you really need that fast glass you could go with the sony 35mm f1.8. In my opinion Sony is where its at right now, super portable and blowing anything in its price range out of the water!
We had a G85 and loved the video quality for the price, but the video autofocus was not great. I didn't realize how not-great it was until we were at a small orgy with some friends and a guy had a Sony a6500. The a6500 tracking AF was (is) far superior. Eventually I saw a floor model or refurbished a6500 and picked it up for about $100 more than I sold the g85 for on Craigslist. One or two of the NSFW videos in our posting history has likely been shot with the G85.
The G85 had a much better touch screen implementation, but the a6500 has considerably better 4K image quality and much better tracking AF. For stills photographers, the difference is likely low, but for video, the Panasonic contract-detect AF is often wobbly and out of focus. In different ways, both the G85 and a6500 are "almost there" cameras.
Edit, forgot to mention that the G85 also has a better rotating screen.
Overall, the G95 looks like a camera that is going to suffer against the a6500, let alone whatever the a6500 successor might be. Already, used a6500s are about $800 - $900. The G95 looks like a little too little, particularly given its weak AF during video performance.
I think the Sony A6500 at $1,298.00 will be a nice upgrade to your 70D. It can shoot clean 1080P at 120 FPS as you can see in this video shot using the Sigma 18-35mm.
You can use the VILTROX EF-NEX IV to adapt your Sigma 18-35mm to Sony A6500. It cost just $136.00.
Are you shooting 4k or 1080? To be honest, all photo cameras will get hot shooting 4k video.
If you shoot HD then you can try an upgrade to a more recent Alpha version, like A6500. You could keep your lenses and sell the A5000 to recoup some of the cost, or put it towards better lenses.
Also consider buying used, from a safe source.
Edit: also consider whether you'd be better served by a video camera. There are devices that put taking outstanding video first, like GoPro.
Is there a large difference between: "Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body Only (discontinued by manufacturer)" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B002NEGTTW and the newer "Canon EOS 7D Mark II Digital SLR Camera" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1458083051&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=cannon+eos+7d+mark+ii
Looking to pick up one of the above models as a birthday gift for my girlfriend. She would be using it for low light concert photography as well as shooting video for basic Vlogs. As there is a considerable price difference, was just curious on the real differences and if anyone had suggestions on the better choice.
Way back when I first started, my fingers liked Canons more too - which is why I have them now. This is the biggest decision really, you can easily get a new body, but switching systems is tough. That said, there is really no wrong choice here. Certainly, I have no regrets.
The 70D is seriously sweet. It's a little cheaper on Amazon but not by much. If you want to go with a cheaper body that is also awesome try looking at a 7D - it's about half the price on Amazon. You go back a generation in sensor tech (not a huge deal at all imo) and lose the fold out screen - but you keep the great AF system and get a magnesium and weather sealed body with a bigger viewfinder. If your hands liked the 70D, they just might like 7D even more, and you'd save enough money to get a couple of primes.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B002NEGTTW/
I am a little hesitant about the superzoom. It's an enormous range, and not especially fast. But that seems like a decent price, and certainly a good way to test out a lot of focal lengths. A whole lot of focal lengths. It's not a good lens for someone like me who likes a lot of bokeh and tends to shoot indoors - for boudoir, portraiture, etc I'd recommend something faster without the super-tele end, perhaps like my Tamron. But if you're shooting outdoors in strong light, I suspect it would do really well with obviously enormous focal flexibility. And hell, you're buying it used, can always resell for roughly the same.
An awesome EF-S lens is the pancake 35mm equivalent, turns your DSLR into a great portable X100-sorta :) Awesome for street photography, shooting people indoors, hiking, etc. This one's a Canon luxury, Nikon doesn't seem to have any good pancakes available.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-24mm-2-8-Lens/dp/B00NI3BZ5K/
It's so cheap you actually don't save any money buying it used - one of the only times I'll say that :)
In general, I'd get EF lenses where possible over EF-S, in case you want to jump to full frame later - but the cheap superzoom and the pancake are good EF-S lenses to have.
I think it interesting that $1168 Canadian ~ $925.39 US
but the same product for the US market (.com instead of .ca) asks for $999. I wonder why this is.
I used a 7D with the kit lens because I didn't have time to rent a nicer one.
He's right: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B002NEGTTW
Just to compare, here is a selection from the Canon side of things with Amazon used prices:
Canon 7d - $990
Tamron 17-50 2.8 - $340
These two are a great basis to work off off and get you to $1330.
If you want to spend some more you could add the following:
Canon 50mm f/1.8 - 100
Canon Speedlite 430EX - 235
But to be honest, if your wife is just starting out and money is a bit tight, don't go out spending $900 or more on a body. As most people will tell you, picture quality is mostly due to lenses. Canon t3i, Canon t4i or 60D as well as Nikon 3200 and 5100 are all excellent bodies and have more than enough features to keep her happy. If you get either of those bodies and a decent 17-50mm lens as well as a 50mm prime she will have great tools to learn on with space to grow.
Just like daegon I would recommend to buy used. Most Photographers look out for their things quite well and most of these lenses and bodies are made at quite good quality levels. I hope this helps.
Shoulda taken a screenshot when i could have. Looks like they're all gone now.
My bad.
Here's a 7D for cheap, though.
Y'all have so many subreddits and a question thread that I wasn't sure where this would go. I'll delete anything that's in the wrong place!
I'm looking at buying a camera in the next couple of days (actually have been for a few months now, but I'm very indecisive) and am currently looking at the Canon ELPH 300 HS and the Olympus PEN E-Pl1. I'm wondering what you more experienced folks would recommend.
DPreview comparison
Snapsort comparison
Canon on Amazon
Olympus on Amazon (shoot, they were both $10 less last week)
I'm being told to spring for the Olympus for the bigger sensor and the ability to change lenses (a friend has offered to loan me lenses for it), but I'm not sure if it's what I need or overkill. I've photographed a bit, but want to learn and practice more.
If I get the Canon I'll definitely be putting CHDK on it. Would that put it a bit more on par with the Olympus? I'm a little concerned about the stated shutter lag on the Olympus.
Ideally I'd like to order in the next few days so that it can arrive before spring break.
I'd go for the GF3:
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GF3-Interchangeable-Digital-Touchscreen/dp/B0054YVA8S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1335216633&amp;sr=8-1
Or the e-PL1:
http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL1-Interchangeable-Digital-Black/dp/B0035LBRJO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1335216696&amp;sr=8-1
I think both of these cameras are much better for video than the D5100. I went from a D90 to the GF1 about a year ago and am very happy I did.
My dad had been dropping hints (not seriously as it turns out) about being interested in photography. I was considering the options for what I might get him. I'm planning on getting a Full Frame body soon, and I could hand him my current camera. He seemed to be wanting one sooner then I would be willing to part with my current Camera. I figured there was at least a 50/50 chance that it wouldn't take and I'd get the camera back. I had decided that I would have prefered a m4/3 system.
Photography is a huge investment, and even with Mirrorless, the ability to invest and retain that investment is a huge deal for me.
I've seen the E-PL1 around for pretty economical prices. I don't know about how well the E-PL1 compares to the NX100, but the options for lenses and the options for bodies is pretty remarkable.
Here is a link for it on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-E-PL1-Interchangeable-Digital-Black/dp/B0035LBRJO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1347930781&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=Panasonic+EPL-1
Found this suggested in this subreddit:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0035LBRJO/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&amp;condition=used
Additionally, I'm sorry to ask if this is only the kind of place where you only want to here from people who want 'the best' and have 3 grand to spend.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035LBRJO/
Are you willing to consider used?
Stop looking, this is the best for the money and what the rest of the comments will say: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-S95-Stabilized-3-0-Inch/dp/B003ZSHNGS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1322360802&amp;sr=8-1
Well, I'm not familiar at all with that camera (or even Sony as a camera brand) so it may have a lot more features than you're aware of (the user manual is your friend!) that would allow you to make better pictures. I will say that I know as far as point-and-shoot cameras go the Cannon S95 is a very nice camera cause it gives you a lot of nice options that you would normally only find on much higher end DSLR type cameras. It's pretty damn expensive at ~$350 for a point and shoot camera though. Being a photographer is very expensive as a hobby I can attest as my mom is a semi-pro photographer and has spent a shitload (that's a technical term in photography) on all her camera gear.
One last question, comparing the camera you linked and the Lumix LX5. Which would you recommend, as you seem to have a lot of knowledge about cameras?
Cannon s95 and the housing for it
They cost about $200 more than the newer versions now, not sure why. I've had mine for over a year but I only put it in the housing when I go diving.
I've been eyeing the Canon Powershot S95 or the updated one recently.
Would be nice if that also has the boot image thingie.
There's another Canon option. A 60D body runs right around a grand.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-60D-Digital-3-0-Inch-Body/dp/B0040JHVCC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1291085259&amp;sr=8-1
My Canon 60D manually goes up to 1/4000 in 1080p.
I assume the cheaper t3i would do the same.
Here are some cameras i'm used or that i've worked with footage from that are in the "affordable" range I think. This is a decent cross-section I think of a lot of the DSLR and Camcorders out there.
It really depends on if you just want a really basic camcorder to just use as a learning platform (I would consider a used DVX or something if that's the case), or if it's something you want to try to use as a professional rig, and if so what do you want to do with it? Narrative work, documentaries, videography work?
Depending on what you're planning some cameras on this list will be good choices, some will be bad.
If you don't mind spending more, maybe think about the Panasonic AF100, or consider looking into the Black Magic: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/855879-REG/Blackmagic_Design_BMD_CINECAM26KEF_Cinema_Camera.html
Or maybe even a used Scarlet or something.
Sub-$1000 Range:
CANON:
T4i/650D, $600-800 depending on kit and reseller.
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/44077443
https://vimeo.com/44366121
https://vimeo.com/49516874
60D, $600-900
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/32416450
https://vimeo.com/38775602
https://vimeo.com/15181980
https://vimeo.com/37153340
Canon HF-G10 $900
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/22978435 - Various cameras are used in this one, but gives you a general idea to the quality of Canon Camcorders
https://vimeo.com/21301495
https://vimeo.com/6519838
NIKON:
Nikon D5200 $800
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/54991854
https://vimeo.com/60135187
https://vimeo.com/57861628
https://vimeo.com/59832019
D7000, $700-900
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/25585194
https://vimeo.com/15894774
https://vimeo.com/31984384
https://vimeo.com/17696909
PANASONIC:
Panasonic GH2, $565-950
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/28454865
https://vimeo.com/57878898
https://vimeo.com/22605282
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U9KmAlrEXU - Trailer for a feature-length film shot with it.
https://vimeo.com/33047750
SONY:
Sony NEX6 $800-900
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/52942499
https://vimeo.com/55598921
https://vimeo.com/56972084
$1000-1800 Range:
CANON:
7D $900-1200
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/25968181
https://vimeo.com/16117083
https://vimeo.com/7764570
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_jWPJwKIE - Trailer for feature-length film shot with it.
5D MK.II, $1400-1800+
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/16339841
https://vimeo.com/33342571
https://vimeo.com/4704533
Some 5D/7D comparisons: https://vimeo.com/14832168
NIKON:
D7100
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/62624613
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgVhkZdyP1c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb1FbZcIfvw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR1oZsqhrX0
PANASONIC:
Panasonic GH3 $1200-1500
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/49420579
https://vimeo.com/49944730
https://vimeo.com/54266780
https://vimeo.com/58762647
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fhEazbFKI
SONY:
Sony NEX7 $1140
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/33599712
https://vimeo.com/36845339
https://vimeo.com/36117747
https://vimeo.com/35176255
$1900-2500 Range:
CANON:
XF100, $2500
-Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/16963810
https://vimeo.com/21187597
https://vimeo.com/27391327
5D MK.III $2500+
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/56203946
https://vimeo.com/47767166
https://vimeo.com/41657820
https://vimeo.com/37838697
NIKON:
D600 $2000-2500
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/58319404
https://vimeo.com/52952766
https://vimeo.com/49989606
https://vimeo.com/52634062
D800 $2500+
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/36305675
https://vimeo.com/56135940
https://vimeo.com/38912704
https://vimeo.com/42065372
PANASONIC:
HMC-150, $2100-2500+
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/9783117
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIRUUnmnMFk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF29YfIKErc
AF100/105 $2500-3000
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/16724324
https://vimeo.com/15765280
https://vimeo.com/16000333
https://vimeo.com/30063219
SONY:
VG20 $2200
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/32747038
https://vimeo.com/31024014
https://vimeo.com/37048917
A99, $2500+
Sample Videos:
https://vimeo.com/52031763
https://vimeo.com/58012010
https://vimeo.com/50982162
Just a tip, but this can easily be found on Amazon by searching Canon 60D Used . I broke the hotshoe mount on mine recently and have been debating buying a used one vs how much it may cost to fix that. =/
I've had the Sony HDR XR-160 since 2011 and have only had one problem with it, the "buffer overload". Here is a clip of test footage. I also have some footage from a really embarrassing videos on YouTube, but I don't want that to be seen...
The Canon Vixia series of camcorders is often fine. I've never used them, but have heard great things from them. Also, with the Canon name, you can expect to get the good optics and quality from the higher quality Canon cameras.
Worst case scenario, and I wouldn't really recommend this, you could use cheap Canon point and shoots for video. Vloggers, video bloggers, use them for their decent quality, and small size. An example of the point and shoot video quality is the CTFxC which is shot entirely on Point and Shoots, same with the Shaytards.
The Canon EOS M could be a great beginner "DSLR" for you. DSLRs can give more types of looks than camcorders.
Honestly, if you have a budget that low and REALLY can't borrow or rent from anyone or anywhere in your area, PLEASE don't get a flip camera with that money. You can get a decent point and shoot that shoots basic HD video (no manual focus though) but good quality otherwise. Look into this for now, I just bought this for my friend's birthday and she absolutely loves it.
Canon Powershot ELPH 300
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q
Some nice features for video...
Shoots in 1080p
24 frames per second, which gives it that "film" look.
Pretty good wide lens for a point and shoot
Let me know if you have any other questions about the camera! In my experience Panasonic and Canon seem to be the best for video in these point and shoots.
Can't go wrong with Canon's Powershot series. This one is small and compact, and will take very nice pictures and video. That's my recommendation.
Should be fine.
However, in that price range, Snapsort recommends this. Same sensor size but the lens quality is probably better on the 300 HS because of the slightly wider maximum aperture and significantly smaller zoom ratio.
Depending on what your cousin wants to shoot, the superzoom capability might outweigh the image quality tradeoff.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q/ref=pd_sxp_grid_i_1_1
I have one of these (currently on Amazon for about 180 dollars) and it takes the best photos I've ever taken with a point-and-shoot. The 1-star reviews aren't accurate for my experience with it. I've kept it in a case in my purse for a couple years now and never had any problems with it.
I highly suggest the Canon Elph 300 (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q ) you can buy it on amazon for 149.00 this camara offers great a great set of features and even an HD video mode. Read the reviews online: most all of them are positive.
hohoho, nice
I'm probably going to get it then.
One more question
Would the filters on this: https://www.amazon.com/EOS-70D-Essentials-Replacement-Accessory/dp/B00GXKV2NU/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1473284821&amp;sr=1-1-spons&amp;keywords=canon%2B70d
Go on this?
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Alpha-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera/dp/B007GK50X4
Or would I need something else? I don't actually know if these filters are universal for cameras or if each camera has specific filters, or if this camera uses filters at all (I don't know if lens and filters do the same thing)
It's $1,148 at both Amazon and B&H for the package that includes the 16-50mm lens. Amazon has it in stock. Perhaps sell the lens if you don't want it or want to save money rather then continue waiting until the body only package is in stock.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1222773-REG/sony_soa6300bk_alpha_a6300_mirrorless_digital.html
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Digital-Camera-16-50mm/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1459114027&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=a6300
You were probably looking at the price of just the body from a third party seller. That wasn't directly from Amazon.
Well it is selling for $848 on amazon right now, brand new WITH a kit lens...so I am thinking you are not going to get $900 for it.
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Mirrorless-Camera-Interchangeable-Digital/dp/B007GK50X4
I guess it depends on where you live, but they are going for $500-$600 on facebook marketplace around me on the low end.
$259?
lx7
Depends what your budget is
Sony DSC-RX100 is a great camera and pretty much considered the best non-interchangeable lens camera. This is the older version but still very similar to the newest.
Panasonic LX7K
Panasonic LF1
Nikon P340
these are all considered better cameras
I use a panasonic lumix. I think this one. Not quite as advanced as a DLSR, but much better than a point and shoot. But if I had the option of picking a camera instead of being gifted this, I would have probably just went ahead and spent the money on a Canon Rebel since it's not that much more expensive.
Lighting is everything in photographing makeup! Sitting by a good light source can make even a phone camera look amazing.
there's a lot to be said for (potentially) breaking rental stuff. I just get into that "if i use this X number of times..." loop. I am vaguely pondering this as (yet another) back up camera... thing is, I really do need a point and shoot as I have a Moto X phone and the camera on that is abysmal...
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-LX7K-Digital-Optical-3-0-inch/dp/B008MB719C/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1422588176&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=Panasonic+Lumix+DMC-LX5
edit: Okay, I've thought about the lens thing. Can you tell me what the price range, portability, and learning curve on that stuff? I'm a very quick learner when it comes to gadgets (I rooted my phone the 3rd day I had it, I do tech support etc). The "travel" video you linked is basically exactly what I want to do, but I also will need audio.
Edit2: Oh...I just reread it (I'm half asleep)...So the thing is, this is going to be a big hiking trip, and I'm not so sure I want to be lugging that bad boy around :/ It's kinda huge. If I have to stop and keep taking it out of the bag every time I want a shot, or I can't climb trees or something wild it's gonna put a huge damper on things. I'm a big climber and although I don't think a GoPro is appropriate due to limitations in zoom etc, I'm not certain that big thing would work.
Edit3: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B008MB719C/switctrave-20 I found this after reading this
http://www.switchbacktravel.com/best-cameras-hiking-backpacking I know I want to be a bit ...not reckless..but..I want to be able to bounce from rock to rock with grace and not risk falling into the water as a result of camera weight. Like if I see something interesting, I dont wanna get out a 4 LBS (how much does your camera weigh?) and be like "oh lemme just jog to get this shot" :P So that's why I was looking into active cams etc, but I also want good quality so :/
Edit4: I'm pretty interested in something with compact size, even if that means sacrificing a bit of quality. I need to be able to move this thing from point A to point B, even if point B is high up in a tree.
>the 18-55mm zoom lens is purely manual - the camera lacks a power zoom
hmm...
____
Holy heck! This is a lot to take in. I'm starting from almost total scratch knowledge here, so I'll have to give some look at what some of this means :P
As much as I'd like to stretch my budget, I'm not sure it's worth it..even if I could. A few questions before I've really understood and digested most of this.
As much as I'd like to get a REALLY nice camera, I really am broke :/
Thanks so much for this brilliant response! This is why I didn't just listen to the goons on the other sub and kept looking :D
Thank you for this information!! This is awesome! My only other questions would be:
Thanks again for all the help. Once I get those questions answered I should be able to order it all up and get going!
Canon EOS-M
It's the size of a point and shoot, operates like a point and shoot, but it has a DSLR size sensor
$350 will get you the camera + 18-55mm lens
$23 for a Minolta SR to EF-M adapter
$65 for a Minolta 135mm Macro
$35 for a Minolta 50mm f1.7 for portraits
Total spent: approx $475, just one way to do it. There are other ways too, but that's not a bad start imo
That's this guy?
EOS
Here's the camera it has been discontinued since I got it camera
They're on sale at amazon right now. You can also get the EOS M with the 18-55 for $350
So you're saying I should go all in and invest into the 6d with the 24-105 L?
Right, but that's what /u/Inviditas was explaining. The "trick" to this picture is the settings used and the length of the exposure. Different settings and a faster (or slower, for that matter) exposure would produce a different picture.
Incidentally, OP said that he used a Canon 6D. It's not a point-and-shoot, so there's no "factory settings".
I just hit up Amazon and new they list at $1,399.99 (body only). Just an FYI.
Okay, so here is what I have so far:
Canon 6d Body Only - $999 Canon EOS 6D 20.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) - Wi-Fi Enabled https://www.amazon.com/dp/B009B0MZ8U/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ztfUAbQ2EFJEK
200mm telephoto lens - $599 Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000053HH5/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_xvfUAbCW0138S
Gimbal - $65 The OFFICIAL ROXANT PRO video camera stabilizer Limited Edition (Midnight Black) With Low Profile Handle for GoPro, Smartphone, Canon, Nikon - or any camera up to 2.1 lbs. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00S10KFTC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_YxfUAb4K36DB2
Look good?
This? Or This?
I've been looking at upgrading to a full frame, but with the smaller jobs that I've been finding that its easier to focus on what different lenses can get me because body upgrades seem to escalate the price point at an exponential rate.
Hey for everyone that has been asking:
Equipment:
Canon 6D
16-35mm Lens
Settings:
ISO 1600
16mm
f/2.8
30-Second Exposure
I slightly turned up the color saturation as well. And thank you everyone for the support! It is greatly appreciated!
Here are some trends of pricing on amazon. (make sure to click the "3rd party used box." it's right around 1k now for 3rd party used.
http://camelcamelcamel.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/product/B009B0MZ8U?context=browse
Hello all, going to purchase my first ever camera (besides what I've been using with my smartphone) and I've decided to get a mirrorless camera since they are compact yet produce good quality photos from what I've read.
I've narrowed it down between the NX 1100 http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-NX1100-Digital-Camera-20-50mm/dp/B00CEH9NFU and the Sony NEX 3N http://www.amazon.com/Sony-NEX-3NL-Compact-Interchangeable-Digital/dp/B00BF9MUBM .
Does anyone have experience with both or either one and can help me make a decision? The Sony 3N is about $60-80 more than the NX1100
haha, understand this a lot better now. thanks so much man! definitely getting the sony in that case.
sorry about this though: one last question.
amazon has something called the nex 3nl/b...is that the same as the nex 3n? http://www.amazon.com/Sony-NEX-3NL-Compact-Interchangeable-Digital/dp/B00BF9MUBM/
also i was thinking about getting it on ebay or something used...it would save me $100...would it be worht it?
If you're willing to spend a little more money I'd go with the sony nex-3n. It will provide you with great pictures, as well as advanced features should you wish to expand your horizons.
GoPros have a very distinct semi-fisheye lens that are great for sport but not that great for...your face.
I'd recommend a point and shoot (mirrorless if you can stretch the budget a little) with a mini-tripod.
Something like this with a few spare batteries.
I'm using this lens and this camera.
Would you consider a Mirrorless System Camera?
The Panasonic GF3 and 14-42 kit lens can be had within your budget:
GF3
Lens
As can the Olympus EPL-3 (which I own):
EPL-3
Both are one generation old, but each is a very good camera, and the Mirrorless system allows you to add better lens as the funds become available.
ETA: Looks like the Sony NEX-3 is also in your budget.
To complement DatAperture's answer the other option in the mirrorless market is Sony. The tradeoff is probably a bit better quality (the same sensors as in APS-C DSLRs) versus larger size and less lens selection.
For your budget you could get a very nice body:
Or a cheaper kit:
and then complement it with some lenses:
The Sigma ones are also available in Nex mount:
For my kind of shooting, on a backpacking trip of Europe I'd go for A6000+19/2.8+50/1.8. Fits in your budget. Is light and small. Gets you a wide angle for scenery and a 50 for everything else, including low light. If you prefer zooms you can get the A6000 with the 16-50 kit lens plus a 55-210.
Sony Rx100m2 You can find them used regularly for under $500. Its a great learning camera, a lot of the manual options from a DSLR, a hot shoe, shoots raw AND fits in your pocket so you can take it anywhere. You can shoot a wide range of things with it but it will fall down in extreme low light. No lenses, no muss, no fuss. Get used to and learn with that and once you find out exactly what you are looking for in a bigger camera then you can make a more informed choice. Yes it is a point and shoot but read the reviews on this it is not a typical point and shoot at all.
None of the cameras you listed are that compact unfortunately. Look into the a6000, it's at the top end of your price range.
To be honest, I'd suggest something like an RX100M2 instead of an interchangeable lens camera. It'll last forever and it has everything you need in a super compact package. It's more capable than any of those Canons and it has NFC in addition to Wifi.
I hardly use the camera on my phone, I prefer to carry this with me. It's obviously thicker than the phone, but smaller in all other dimensions.
Not cheap but I highly recommend the rx100 m2.
I travel full time and when my big camera met the ocean I got one of these and I've been more then impressed. Great low light shots, very versatile and the nfc feature lets you easily take pictures of yourself using a smart phone as a remote (use a gorillapod)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DM8R866/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00DM8R866&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=redditdiscount-20
1.Moto G5 Plus---➤₹15999
2.[OnePlus 3T] (http://amzn.to/2v3QQGS)---➤₹27,999
3.Seagate1.5TB Portable External Drive---➤₹4,099
4.Google Pixel 32GB---➤₹38,999
5.LG G6---➤₹37,990
6.Canon 1300D with 18-55mm Lens, 16GB Card & Carry Case ---➤ ₹21,990
7.[Sony RX100M2] (http://amzn.to/2uam2Yu) ---➤ 37,999
First post here, I've basicly spent the last couple of days researching/buying gear around your price point. I already possessed a Zoom H1, but since you can use your phone for that purpose, I'd say we're about in the same boat.
I'd personally recommend you to check out four primary options. If the newest model is too pricey, it might be worthwhile to check out the older versions.
Downside: Bulky.
Honestly, I'm confident that this is probably the best camera out there for video right now, at least at its price point. However, if portability is a must, this one simply doesn't cut it.
I haven't gone over the full details for all of them, but if any of them interest you in particular, just find some reviews and you'll get a good idea of what they're all about. Also, some are a bit over your budget, but I don't know how tight your finances are so I figured I'd just give you my take.
Lastly, definitely don't forget audio as mentioned in the thread already. A lav mic will get your far since you can use it with the panasonics or your phone.
Hope this has been more than just a rant. Good luck!
I snuck it in there, she was looking at either the T6 or D3300 because they were in her budget and liked what she saw. My budget is around 2.5x that (which means I could get either of those bodies and a few good lenses, or "invest" for a nicer body with better/more features), basically $800-$999 for a body and a nice lens or 2 to start, then get her another lens in a few months. I was looking at this kit, which falls in line with the D3300, here, or the T6i set here, but was thinking maybe getting the body and a nice lens separately. I was looking into the 70D with a nice lens because 2 of my coworkers highly recommended it (they do a lot of photography). I believe the D5500 is also pretty good for video though, and seems like a nice option to have, but not a primary concern, and I'm leaning towards it. I've exhausted my coworkers with my indecisiveness. She likes the Nikon because it has a slightly lower crop factor, but the Canon for it's sensor from what I understand.
It is - There is a bit of a paradigm shift going on right now with videography. DSLRs are about to become (IMO) a very disruptive force in the market.
From FreddieW's (the guy who made the video you linked) FAQ (emphasis mine):
>What camera should I buy?
>Rule 1: If you can borrow a camera, just borrow it! Otherwise, get the nicest camera you can afford. I’m super jealous of all you guys nowadays because almost any camera you can buy is about a thousand times better than what I used to use. Otherwise, look for a camera that shoots HD, and a camera that ideally doesn’t record to tape – that way you don’t have to deal with capturing from tapes, which can be a pain.
>DSLR cameras are currently the best blend of being affordable while still providing a professional quality image. If you don’t take a lot of still photos, I recommend the Canon T3i or the Canon 60D (T3i is slightly cheaper). If you do take a lot of still photos, look at the Canon 7D or 5D. Alternately, the Lumix GH2 is another really good DSLR camera.
I'm going to ignore good form and suggest something just over your price range: Panasonic LX7. It's near $300 right now, but should drop near $200 if you wait for a sale. Incredible glass on that thing (for a <$300 P&S).
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-20-2-Digital-Camera-3-0-Inch/dp/B009B0MZ8U
with the 24-105 L and WiFi bundle.
I recommend the Canon 70D, Canon has a great selection of lenses. Granted this is APS-C, its still a great budget camera.
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Only/dp/B00DMS0GTC
Ha totally! I'm probably as full of myself as much as I hate myself. But let me give you the rundown and go in detail:
First - I saw the caption. I stand by what I said about it. Language, man, it's nuanced and important. At first I was certain the piece wasn't yours, especially because it's pretty good.
So - I reverse-imaged your artwork. I glanced through a bunch of deleted reddit threads without any leads until I saw the booty blog. OH SNAP! It's ON now, bitch (was the mentality that motivated me). I went back to the threads, saw the accusations of you being racist, and really flipped my shit. That's the kind of hypocrisy that goes far deeper than race or prejudice. I had to really hit home and hit deep with what I say.
My fury was fierce yet the trail was running cold... At this point all I know is the blog I saw, the post in /r/blackladies, your initials and that you moved to Tampa... Until I saw your web links in the lower left corner of your piece. Again, man - language! The art of? /u/comradepyro said it best - > Bit of an ego there, mate. Anyway, that's how I see your portfolio, CV, etc. It was kind of a thrill, I've never felt like a private eye before! I'm also shocked at how much I found out... Please take this as a wake up call on online privacy! I'm actually a bit freaked out. I've never just "Googled" someone so extensively. Be really careful with any bits of info. I can PM you the details of what else I found if you want.
/u/HarlequinForestFairy said that I "hate you so much" - you pissed me off; there's a difference. And you continue to do it! The way you use language is political - not in terms of Republican/Democrat but in the context of Slavoj Zizek's Violence. I generally agree with you but I'm irritated by the way you say it.
> A person does not truly value their humanity until they experience it being taken away from them.
Totally. Please read Violence though and think about the word "humanity". Selfishness - yeah. By the way, did you know that our species can be traced back to the first hominoid that did not abandon its sick and elderly? Suffering - mmmhhmmm. Kafka, Nietzsche, Van Gogh, so on and so on. Suffering is an odd thing for sure. Is David Foster Wallace less of a writer because his suffering was mental and emotional? See what I mean? "Dehumanization" is one bitch of a word.
I've had a pretty comfortable life. Off the top of my head, I probably experienced 5 "tragedies" (more like first-world problems).
Lol. Boohoo. I'm a lucky fuck but the sad lil' ENFP within doesn't appreciate it enough and likes to bitch instead. But you sort of proved my point right there and then...
TL;DR: I'm not hating on your art so don't feel the need to defend it. I'm criticizing your self-importance.
Anyway,
Good luck.
So if LOTR ticket price was $9, and LOTR II was $13... you would be ok with that?
It's not $500. It's nearly $1500.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331523348&amp;sr=8-1
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-21-1MP-Frame-Digital-Camera/dp/B001G5ZTLS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331523359&amp;sr=8-1
It's not like we're going from the 5D to the 1D...we're going from the 2008 model to the 2012 model of the same camera.
With the mere price difference b/n the two models you can practically buy yourself a 7D with that money.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-CMOS-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B002NEGTTW/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1331523433&amp;sr=1-1
You're supporting your argument by saying that the Ipad followed with a pricing structure that would match what I'm requesting, then you go on to say the iPad's pricing structure is irrelevant to the discussion.
I can plainly see I'm not exactly going up against a master of logic and will refrain from taxing your mental resources any further.