(Part 3) Top products from r/TheBluePill

I know that I am 7 days late, but I just read your comment and I just… Can’t.

What? You're a girl? Your argument is completely moot, then! This absolutely holds zero weight now that I know you're a girl.

The fact that you just dismissed everything I said because of my gender, really demonstrates your lack of objectivity and logic. In case you haven’t figured this out, gender is not a black or white thing. You can be Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Pansexual, Transgender, Transsexual, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Intergender, Asexual , etc. Not to mention the fact that you can be a straight, cisgender person who does not conform to most of, if any of the stereotypes attributed to your gender.

You have no idea what it's like to be a guy

You just put almost 4 billion people into one category. Good job on sounding like a dumbass. You have no idea what I’m like, and the fact that you think every male is like you shows that you have zero objective reasoning skills. Travel the world a bit and you’ll realize how much “being a guy” differs from culture to culture, not to mention from person to person.

I’m not even red pill

Your labels mean nothing to me, and furthermore, you've already proven that you’re ignorant as fuck. You’re also sexist since you dismissed everything I said because I have a vagina.


You aren't a guy. You don't have the male libido. Unfortunately, you can never understand this because you don't think about sex every 2 seconds. Yes. We are prisoners to our libido. For most guys, it's fucking torture to not have sex for a month or longer.

The “male libido” is not a thing lol. Men’s libidos fall into a wide range, and contrary to what the media told you, not every male has a high libido. If this were true, there wouldn’t be millions of women complaining that their sex drives are higher than their partners. All of my best friends have been male since I was about 3 years old. 5 of them have told me that they do not have a high sex drive, that they can go a long time without having sex. Of course, this is not something that they publicize to everyone which further perpetuates the stereotypes. Two of my exes had lower sex drives than I did. I’m sorry that you live in a bubble and haven’t had enough experience to realize the wide variety of sex drives out there.

"Spinning plates" is way fucking better than not spinning plates, by a large margin.

How do you know this? You have just proven what I said in my previous post, that those who have not experienced something and crave it, have many grand illusions about the fulfillment that the object of their desire will bring to them. I have dated some super hot guys who had been having tons of sex since the day they hit puberty; they have all confirmed that it does not fulfill them at all. I have many friends who are male models, they have told me the same thing. You will however dismiss this and choose to believe a bunch of guys like yourself whose years of desperation have warped their whole perception of true self-esteem and fulfillment.

That is not an exaggeration, we think about sex every 2 seconds. It is on our minds all the time.

Wow, do you ever stop projecting your own experiences onto everyone else? Also, how do you know that I do not think of sex all the time? You don’t know a fucking thing, you’re just a silly hamster trying to rationalize your own obsessions and desperation. Guys who have a very easy time getting sex do not think of sex every two seconds, I know this from experience. In fact, it turned out that I thought of sex more than my ex did, and his sex drive was very high. It makes sense though that you think of sex every minute, because the lack of it has caused you to become obsessed with it. I feel your pain though, because when I went long time without having sex, I thought about it all the time too. Meditation might help you.

See, this doesn't hold any weight in the argument since you're a girl.

Again with the sexism; do you ever stop trying to put everything and everyone into little boxes? There are much healthier ways to deal with the uncertainty of life than to dull your existence to that level. I am the kind of person who others open up to, and I often have very deep conversations with people. This is something that most of my very hot “alpha” male friends and exes have told me, not to mention basic psychology.

You don't understand that guys do not receive the same amount of attention from girls as vice versa.

You clearly don’t know many guys, because two of my best friends (male) get checked out constantly. I can’t spend a night out with them without little girls obsessing over them and walking by our table 10 times. Just because you haven’t gotten much female attention, does not mean that other guys don’t.

Plus, if you're as attractive as you say you are, you probably have at least 4 male friends in your phone contacts right now, that if you asked them for sex, they'd come over and fuck you within the hour.

This is another myth. If this were true, I wouldn’t have had periods where I didn’t have sex for months at a time. Also, my very good looking female friends wouldn’t complain to me constantly about how horny they are and how there’s no one to have sex with. Contrary to what you think, most attractive guys are not animals who will fuck someone after knowing them for a few hours, or run out to fuck someone just because they got a text. It takes time for them to get comfortable too. My best friend is gorgeous and has turned down girls who he feels want to use him for sex, in fact, he is very selective for precisely this reason. Everyone is different, and most intelligent people have their own views and beliefs about sexuality that are not dictated by the hive mind.
It would make sense though that you would jump at the chance to fuck a girl if she booty called you because you’re desperate and have been desperate for a long time.
Anyways, good luck to you dude and I hope you find happiness in your life.

http://www.amazon.com/New-Earth-Awakening-Purpose-Selection/dp/0452289963

https://m.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/how-do-i-love-thee-sonnet-43

>How Do I Love Thee? (Sonnet 43)
Elizabeth Barrett Browning, 1806 - 1861

>How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of being and ideal grace.
I love thee to the level of every day’s
Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light.
I love thee freely, as men strive for right.
I love thee purely, as they turn from praise.
I love thee with the passion put to use
In my old griefs, and with my childhood’s faith.
I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints. I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life; and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death.



https://www.amazon.com/Desiring-Voices-Sonneteers-Petrarchism-Literature/dp/0809323079

Who the fuck has ever started a war for love outside of mythology? How would anyone call that a good thing? How is Paris kidnapping Helen because she was the most beautiful woman in the world anything other than selfish infatuation, or as you say, tingles.

Symphonies were generally written for money and prestige not love.

Romanticism had little to do with actual romance.

Well, not really even that, if we're being serious and not just mocking redpillers. Solipsism just acknowledges that we only ever experience our own minds, therefore we can only ever be certain of the existence of our own minds, and nothing more than that. It doesn't mean that the external world doesn't exist, just that we can never really be sure.

Epistemology is really, really fun. I strongly recommend this excellent primer on the history of epistemology.

If anyone's curious, there have been more than a few philosophy of biology books from a feminist perspective. The Case of the Female Orgasm made a big splash about a decade ago in critiquing the whole Masters & Johnson legacy on sex. It's an interesting read and the author was a student of Stephen Jay Gould. Not to mention I think some feminists would have a hard time accepting one of its conclusions, that being the male orgasm drove the evolution of the female one.

Also, this is supposed to be pretty good as well, though I can't say I've read it.

Well in "Woman: An Intimate Geography" Natalie Angier explains it that mammals traditionally had sex with the man entering from behind the woman ("doggy style", etc.) and so men associated the shape of women's buttocks with sex.

The idea is that women who had large breasts were more likely to have intercourse with men in face to face positions, because the men liked the look of breasts because they reminded them of buttocks. Having sex in face to face positions included more eye contact, which lead to more oxytocin release upon orgasm which lead to stronger pair bonding and love which created a more stable bond between parents and more involvement in children's lives from their father because he was so in love with the mother.

The other hypothesis Angier covers is that breasts are so aesthetically pleasing that women who had spare food or supplies were more likely to give it to the women with bigger breasts.

This sounds goofy, but it's still a really good book.

TRPer here... well I suppose that is vague but I'd say I read TRP often and while I don't aspire to become Johnny Bravo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnGnl-UElVA I can answer your question.

TRP seeks to accomplish nothing. It's a way to frame male / female interactions and relationships for men that likely grew up without a real male role model of any sort.

It's http://www.amazon.com/No-More-Mr-Nice-Guy/dp/0762415339 on steroids.

A better question is... what does TBP seek to accomplish. I have found some sub reddits ban link to TRP so it's useful to send people here and they will make their way over to TRP from here :)

>Whenever you're challenged by college about anything you're personally invested in, you can run straight to reddit to have people reassure you

OMG HOW DO U KNOW MUH LYF??????????????

>Let's say you took a course that said there are biotruths about gender differences

Lol, that course does not exist. I have biology and anthropology major friends.

>Reddit is a vehicle you'll use to deflect the possibility that this little SJW fantasy you've built up is actually bullshit.

U r so rite!!!!!!!!

This academic work does not exist, I have never learned about gender and racial prejudices or inequalities and the inefficiencies they cause in econ classes, my entire education has been a FANTASY!!!!!!!!!!

Oh yeah, I've heard of this before. Pretty sure it comes from the retro book "Fascinating Womanhood".

Notably, it has some other advice about relating to your husband that would make RPWs/TRPs rage, though:

> "like a child who wants too many cookies, a man must be denied [sex] sometimes for his own good."

https://www.amazon.com/Cosmopolitan-Canopy-Race-Civility-Everyday/dp/0393340511

https://www.amazon.com/Will-Change-Men-Masculinity-Love/dp/0743456084

You should read Alias.

The show was based off this particular run.

Some of these posts may be 2gamma4me.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - 1, 2, 3, 4
   
   
2. r/needadvice - [Error](https://archive.is/?run=1&url=%2Fr%2Fneedadvice "error auto-archiving; click to submit it!"), 1, [Error](http://megalodon.jp/ "error auto-archiving; click to submit it!")
   
   
3. Amazon - 1, 2, 3
   
   ^(I am a bot.) ^([Info](/r/SnapshillBot) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=\/r\/SnapshillBot))

I'm really sorry about your previous relationship, OP. hugs You're really brave for getting yourself out of that situation.

There's a really great book I've been reading that's been mentioned a lot, here and in other subs like /r/relationships, called


"Why does he do that?" by Lundy Bancroft.

Bancroft is a counsellor who has worked with abusive men to change their behaviours. In the book, he outlines a lot of tactics that abusers use, which are (surprise, surprise) pretty much the same tactics TRPers talk about to win over women.

He also mentions tips that women can use to identify/avoid potential abusers. (I'll see if I can find that section and post it here)

It's a worthwhile read - you should definitely check it out!


Edit: (Some Key Points from Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That" - How Can I Tell if a Man I'm Seeing Will Become Abusive?)

• He speaks disrespectfully about his former partners: Be cautious if he is very focused on his bitterness or tells you about his exes early on in your dating. Also, be aware if he says you are nothing like the women he's been involved with - it could be a tactic to get you to work doubly hard to prove you're not like the women he was with.
  
  
• He is disrespectful towards you: Put downs, sneering at your opinions, rudeness towards you in front of other people communicates lack of respect. Also, if he idealizes you, puts you on a pedestal, treats you like a fine piece of china, this is also something to watch out for. He could turn nasty if you don't live up to his perfect image
  
  
• He does favors for you that you don't want or puts on such a show of generosity that it makes you uncomfortable: This may be a sign of someone who is trying to create a sense of indebtedness
  
  
• He is controlling: This usually starts off gradually, with subtle hints about your clothes or looks, or negative remarks about family or friends. Eventually, he may start to show hints of impatience that you don't share the same opinions.
  
  
• He is possessive: Possessiveness shows he doesn't love you as an independent human being but rather as a guarded treasure
  
  
• Nothing is ever his fault: As time goes by, the target of blame increasingly becomes you.
  
  
• He is self-centered: Notice when he does a lot more than his share of talking, listens poorly when you speak, shifts the topic of conversation to himself
  
  
• He abuses drugs or alcohol: Bancroft says that chances are, even without a drug/alcohol addiction, the abuser will always remain an abuser, and will blame his behaviours on the drugs/alcohol. However, be careful if he pressures you to take drugs/alcohol with him.
  
  
• He pressures you for sex
  
  
• He gets serious too quickly about the relationship
  
  
• He intimidates you when he's angry
  
  
• He has double standards
  
  
• He has negative attitudes towards women
  
  
• He treats you differently around other people
  
  
• He appears to be attracted to vulnerability
  
  
  Edit #2: Gilded? Me? Gilded? Oh, wow! I'm all of a dither
  
  breathes into a paper bag
  
  Thank you so much, kind redditor!
  
  Oh, and for those of you looking for Why Does He Do That?, here's a link to Amazon:
  
  http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-He-That-Controlling/dp/0425191656
  
  
  
  
  

This is an especially valid point when you consider that sociopaths are much more likely than the average person to end up dead as the result of drug or crime related activity, to contract HIV, to end up in prison, to end up incapacitated by other mental illnesses (hypochondria is a common one), and on and on. The majority of them are either dead or "burned out" (suffering greatly from one of the aforementioned consequences) by the time they reach their early 50s. (All info from The Sociopath Next Door, chapter 10.)

So, basically, these terpy terps are willing to literally risk their very lives in order to try to get some pussy.

Good job, idiots.

I made the same mistake but the comment actually suggests A Farewall to ALms, a "sobering challenge to the idea that poor societies can be economically developed through outside intervention."

... Which sounds exactly as relevant as Hemingway. I doubt Clark argues that poor countries should kill their homeless in order to develop.