Reddit reviews Vortex Optics Crossfire II Dead Hold BDC Reticle Riflescope, 3-9x40, Black (CF2-31007)
We found 8 Reddit comments about Vortex Optics Crossfire II Dead Hold BDC Reticle Riflescope, 3-9x40, Black (CF2-31007). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
The 3-9x40 Crossfire II riflescope is one of many configurations in the Crossfire II line. The Dead-Hold BDC reticle is good for hunting/shooting at varying ranges where estimating holdover is a concern.With long eye relief and an ultra-forgiving eye box, you'll be able to quickly get a sight picture and acquire your target. The fast focus eyepiece allows quick and easy reticle focusing.Anti-reflective, fully multi-coated lenses provide bright and clear views for the user.Capped reset turrets are finger adjustable with MOA clicks that can be reset to zero after sighting in.A single piece tube constructed from aircraft grade aluminum ensures strength and shockproof performance. O-ring sealed and nitrogen purged, the Crossfire II delivers waterproof and fogproof performance.
Get a vortex, primary arms, or bushnell scope.
Don't waste your time on trash.
I was looking for a scope in that range too and came across a r/LongRange thread asking for a ~$100 scope recommendation a couple days ago[1]. After a bit of searching I decided to get a vortex crossfire 3-9 for my 10/22[2].
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/longrange/comments/5lddd0/what_is_the_best_sub_100_yes_under_one_hundred/
[2] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00794LK18/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Crossfire 3-9x40 is $150. It may be inexpensive, but Vortex believes in it enough to send you another one no matter what if it breaks.
You really won't get a worthwhile one at 100; keep the current scope if that's all you can put towards it. Take the 100 you have now and add 10-20 bucks a month for a few months. If you can get to like 150-175 a vortex crossfire II or a Nikon Prostaff are OK.
Vortex: http://www.amazon.com/Vortex-Optics-Crossfire-Riflescope-CF2-31007/dp/B00794LK18/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1457328163&sr=8-2&keywords=vortex+crossfire+II
Nikon Prostaff: http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-ProStaff-Black-Riflescope-Nikoplex/dp/B004MY5L18/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1457328205&sr=8-2&keywords=Nikon+Prostaff
Redfield Revolution is OK at that price too: http://www.amazon.com/Redfield-67090-Revolution-3-9x40mm-4-Plex/dp/B0032KOSQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457328234&sr=8-1&keywords=redfield+revolution
As it stands now, with only 100 dollars, you won't buy a better scope than it came with at all. You're better off not spending any money than spending 100.
I will say you get very significant jumps in quality going up to the mid 200s and then the ~350 range as well, but if those are just flat out of the budget, the three linked scopes are pretty much the only sub 200 dollar scopes I'd bother with at all on a centerfire.
Don't.
If you want a red dot buy this.
If you want a scope buy this.
Cheap combos are a waste of money.
You should get this one.
I have two 22LR rifles, one with a Simmons 3-9 rimfire scope for about $40, one with a Vortex Crossfire 2 3-9 for more like $120.
The simmons is sufficient, but the extra $100 does buy a significantly sharper view. So I guess it depends on what your wallet likes. I would point you to the nicer glass, especially if you're practicing distance/bullseye shooting.
FFP is really only important for helping you figure out how far or how big a target is. You don't need such a thing for rimfire shooting IMO.
You can get a crossfire for $149 now