(Part 2) Best camera & photo filters according to redditors

Essentially it's a neutral density filter, these come in a variety of different styles, they have graduated neutral density filters that are essentially a gradient from light to dark, or some that are a hard stop and simply half (or 1/3) darker and the rest is clear.

They are designed for exactly this purpose, it enables a photographer to expose every portion of a scene in a single image without having to composite multiple images in post.

---
Here is one such kit.

And here is another.

Nope, I think it's a circular polarizing filter (like this).

The photographer likely also had a polarizer on - hence making it black.

Just a few more to add to the list:

18% grey card

Neewer TT560 flash

Neewer 43-inch 5-in-1 reflector

Tiffen Circular polarizer

7 ft. light stand

47" Speedlight Umbrella Softbox

Continuous lighting kit

New camera bag


[EDIT] Added more things to the list, as I think of things I'll continue to expand it.

Went a little burgundy crazy lately...

• burgundy AE Strands (only $80!)
  
• burgundy 35mm belt from Etsy (hasn't arrived yet)
  
• 22mm burgundy watch strap (also hasn't arrived yet)
  
  And a Sony tripod and a cheap camera remote for WAYWT purposes.
  
  And I almost got these Quoddy Maliseet mocs for $145 shipped in my size during Unionmade's sale yesterday but my bank account was $10 short. Would have been able to cop if I hadn't ordered pizza the week before. Fucking hell. Oh well, lesson learned. Pizza isn't always a good thing. Just usually.

https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-d3300-black-digital-camera-body-24-2-m-p.html - D3300 - $238

https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-nikkor-18-mm-55-mm-f-3-5-5-6-zoom-lens-for-nikon-f.html - 18-55 $76

https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-55-200mm-f-4-5-6-g-ed-if-dx-af-s-vr-autofocus-lens-for-aps-c-sensor-dslrs-52-nikon-55-200mm-f-4-5-6-g-ed-if-dx-af-s-vr-autofocus-lens-for-aps-c-sensor-dslrs-52.html - 55-200 $53

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J5RHBQ4 - Memory card - $19.48

https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Circular-Polarizer-Lens-52/dp/B00XNMXNV0 - CPL - Fits both lenses
$9.64

https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Sling-Backpack-SLR-Cameras/dp/B005VTIMEQ - Sling bag - 22.08 (Or you could get a backpack style bag, or an insert to go into a backpack she already has)

https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Alluminum-Camera-Camcorder-17-6lbs/dp/B00WWNFRD8 - Tripod $52.94

So for $471.14 your can get a camera, 2 lenses, bag, memory card and tripod all for her.

There was a thread on ND filters last week - search for "ND Filters". General consensus is don't buy the cheap adjustable ones. In the $20-30 range fixed ND filters are fine, and $150 is a silly price to pay for one. If you want an adjustable one, though, spend the big bucks.

As for the polarizer, i use an AmazonBasics Polarizer. It works as expected, and I'm not sure it makes sense to spend more on the polarizer.

Are there any commercial aspherical ND filter solutions for lenses such as the Samyang/Rokinon 14mm F/2.8?

Seems based on my googling there are only DIY and hack jobs which I'm not too comfortable with. I've read about some stuff like this but I'm unsure if it will fit the lens above.

• Filter Holder
  
  
• Lens Adapter Ring with your filter thread diameter (here example with 77mm)

I found a 23oz tripod. Most photographers will laugh at this and say it's not sufficient, but most photographers aren't backpackers and don't understand the need or constraints. When we're worried it needs to be heavier we just clip our one litre water bottle to it. ;o)

Sony VCT-R100 Lightweight Compact Tripod: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000EFIJTA?pc_redir=1398130234&robot_redir=1

What everyone has said about getting what you pay for is historically true, however I hope that is broken with the ND I just bought that arrived yesterday. After reading several reviews with examples, I am putting my faith in this filter on my upcoming Iceland trip:

http://www.amazon.com/ND1000-Filter-Neutral-Density-Optical/dp/B00GNARENC?ie=UTF8&psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o05_s00

This is after seeing MANY side by side comparisons, even showing the more expensive Tiffen glass and other reputable company offerings cast much worse than this filter. I plan to test it prior to my trip and if I have poor results, I'll be sure to post about it here.

Review with samples

You need an ND filter. It acts like "sunglasses" for your lens and cuts light from hitting the sensor. Cheap ones might introduce color cast and flare, more expensive ones are better coated and won't have as bad color casts but they're...well...expensive.

https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B00JL4INW8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_00HFDb3E3WV49

This is the one I used but the light there was also dark enough to not use it. I don’t know if I really like the filter yet, I think I’d prefer a fixed non variable one

My friend uses these Polar Pros for his spark and really liked them.

It's important to make sure they don't interfere with your gimbal.

the 49 dollar set at best buy or even on amazon gives you good filters from polarpro at the cheaper price. its only a few bucks more than what youre think of getting.

https://www.amazon.com/PolarPro-Filter-3-Pack-Optical-Filters/dp/B073G9X7TR/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1527040779&sr=8-4&keywords=polar+pro+spark+filters

I have a D5100 and I was on the same boat as you. I wanted to be able to do macro shots, yet found that a whole macro lens is terribly expensive. As an alternative, I got macro filters from Amazon which have worked very well for me. If you're adamant about getting a full lens, I don't have any suggestions for you, but...



Here is a picture I took of a doorknob center with maximum magnification when I was using the filters Note: the image was cropped to be narrow


This is what it looks like using the normal macro settings on my camera without any filters


Lastly, here is a +18 magnification of the keyhole in its full image size

Comment edits for formatting

GoPro Hero 7 Black and these:


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0773YM7JK/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_BmMLDb1ZEKN8C


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M4I7RKG/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_RnMLDb16RSBWS


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B075WR3ZTQ/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_noMLDbK6PNZ9S

Very well. Try this one for the Hero6. As you can see in the link from my original comment, the filters are depth rated and get redder and redder the deeper you go;ideally you would switch between them. Realistically, I used the 20-55 ft one on the drawstring, 100% of the time, and popped it off for surface recording and night dives. Also highly recommend some type of handle/rod so you can curl the camera around some formations or get into crevices.

I actually used a really cheap-o Ice brand ND filter.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GNARENC/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Since I needed an 82mm thread I didn't want to pay $150+ for a legit one so I gave the Ice brand a chance. It has really surprised me and been great!

Is there any brand or certain type of circular polarizer you recommend? This Tiffen 58mm lens on Amazon has fairly good reviews...

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XYL8RW4/ref=ya_st_dp_summary?ie=UTF8&psc=1


I've gotten a few Neewer brand products for my Sony a6300 and have always been impressed with the quality of their gear compared to price.
I got these lenses on Friday and they worked great. I took the mavic out on a really clear and bright day and was able to keep the shutter speed at 50 shooting at 24 frames using the nd 16 filter.
I got home and uploaded some footage and it looked great!

Couple thoughts for you. Firstly, looking through your other shots, I think this one fits the bill here a lot better. I'll give you credit for trying to go your own way with choice in focus, and it could be an interesting idea, but the shot you selected seems to fall somewhere in the middle. I think to accomplish what you're hinting at would require a closer focal point, which is limited by your gear in this case.

If you want to try taking some macro shots, there are some cheap ways to get your foot in the door. Mind you, cheap is cheap, so don't expect the world from something like this, but at the same time, it can get you playing with the compositions you want relatively painlessly. I got one of this exact set when I got my first camera, and still use them on my 600D from time to time. I'm assuming yours came with the EF-s 18-55mm kit, like mine did, for which this should work:

http://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-Close-Up-Macro-Filter-Pouch/dp/B004DRCEDW

They'll bring your focal point from around a foot to a matter of centimeters, depending on which you use.

Here are some examples that I've taken, using those exact attachments with the same lens.

Here,

and here,

and here.

You can see the optics aren't fantastic, but you can't expect them to be for such cheap accessories. Also, here are a couple examples using the same attachments on a bit nicer EF 28mm 1.8 USM, same camera (1),(2).


Mind you, I'm far from a professional, so take this as you will. Just trying to give you something helpful based on my own experience.


One final thing, completely unrelated to any of the previous discussion, but the Canon EF 50mm 1.8 lens is a crazy good lens for what it costs. I mean, it's loud, and it has no image stabilization, but the difference between it and the kit at the same focal length is worth mentioning, and being able to crank it wide open at times will let you shoot faster at lower ISO (which is nice, because fighting noise is a constant battle with that camera). Also, opening all the way to 1.8, that lens will let you absolutely soak a shot in bokeh should you decide to (eg).

How about they are at the library, in the darkest corner in a section no one ever goes near and they are huddled and discussing excitedly but whispering...you would want to have a snoot on your strobe so everything around them is dark...

SCENE There's one thats a bit more than $5 in the used section...

When I was starting out I wasn't sure what ND filters I needed so I purchased this filter set and have since been upgrading the filters as I need them with higher quality Cokin ones.
I found that this set looked surprisingly good for the price and allowed me to to experiment with graduated NDs as well as acted as a makeshift matte box. I also still use the holder for my current filters.
For anyone starting out I'd also highly recommend getting a circular polarizer, it's the one filter that never leaves my lens when shooting outside and it also adds a nice color pop and reduces catching glare and reflections.

You should grab one of these. Great for getting rid of glare and getting details on clouds... through water... etc.

AmazonBasics Circular Polarizer Camera
Photography Lens - 58 mm
https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B00XNMXYBY/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_KSBADbSBD8MYN

If you've got a pair of polarized sunglasses handy you can hold them in front of the lens and shoot through those. Just rotate them around until you find the sweetspot.

I've only used them once so far, the ones I got were these:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073G9X7TR/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Comparing footage to no filter, it does tend to smooth out certain transitions due to reducing the shutter speed. Def worth 20 bucks to improve the quality.

Polarizing filters are pretty cheap! This one's $20 right now (List price $80). They're even cheaper if not circular - you want a circular one if you want to be able to achieve the effect from any given angle, though.

e: word

I appreciate all the fast responses. I have researched a a bit and decided to go with these.
Macro Lens:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005C50H2Y/ref=ox_sc_act_image_3?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

Uv lens:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00XNMWCF8/ref=ox_sc_act_image_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

Polarizer lens:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00XNMXNV0/ref=ox_sc_act_image_2?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1

Camera:
https://www.ebay.com/p/Nikon-D3400-DSLR-Camera-Body-Only-black/886214437?iid=172511228968&chn=ps&ul_ref=https%253A%252F%252Frover.ebay.com%252Frover%252F1%252F711-117182-37290-0%252F2%253Fmpre%253Dhttps%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.ebay.com%25252Fp%25252FNikon-D3400-DSLR-Camera-Body-Only-black%25252F886214437%25253Fiid%25253D172511228968%252526chn%25253Dps%2526itemid%253D172511228968%2526targetid%253D313776934696%2526device%253Dm%2526adtype%253Dpla%2526googleloc%253D9052898%2526poi%253D%2526campaignid%253D833559251%2526adgroupid%253D39417365901%2526rlsatarget%253Dpla-313776934696%2526abcId%253D1123856%2526merchantid%253D8567664%2526gclid%253DCjwKCAjwt5DXBRAtEiwAa3vyEijalntN16m4qbG8DRZvYmt-5wBg5dFSSbEBT5f7NBkTr8MSWfoBPhoCNgkQAvD_BwE%2526srcrot%253D711-117182-37290-0%2526rvr_id%253D1514306914752%2526rvr_ts%253D0f7ac2661630aad93b312adbfffe4164

Tripod:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/366230-REG/Nikon_822_Compact_Tripod_with_2_Way.html?ap=y&c3api=1876%2C92051678402%2C%2C&gclid=CjwKCAjwt5DXBRAtEiwAa3vyEpvng7_mfdC4T8JpbT4Q9RTy9EbGakAcC4xrgV7FQjh9FnJOUU6KvRoCb-AQAvD_BwE


Will this be sufficient for this use? Any recommendation other assessories that would be helpful?

I just purchased https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00485ZJB8/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Variable 4-8 stop still wasn't dark enough for me, and near the '8stop' I would get a weird X on the filter. GH5, speedbooster, 18-35mm 1.8 sigma and VLOG (400iso) make everything really bright, so if you have anything close to this set up you'll need a super strong ND, I have a feeling 10stop still won't be enough for strong daylight

Believe it or not, this is my daily tripod that I carry. I put my Nikon F5 on it but only with a 50mm lens.

It's plastic but a good quality one.

So why welding glass? Wouldn't a cheap ND filter set work as well or better?

Or is welding glass just super super dark?

To each their own. TBH I don't have any experience trying to get the kit lens to do macro with a filter or tube but have had success with a filter just fine on my 35mm (which costs ~$130 used). Linking a couple of shots below as well as the close-up filter I use below as reference.

https://flic.kr/p/2gncoU7

https://flic.kr/p/2giTPdB


https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004E54LBQ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I agree with oldscotch. This lens is great and easy to use. It also encourages to move your feet more to get the right angle rather than rely on zoom. I ended up using this a lot more than the 18-55 5.6 kit lens when I started off cause it was just more fun. Also, the price is pretty good:

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-35mm-1-8G-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334116656&sr=8-1

Usually it's $199 so I'd just wait a few days until they get more.

Another thing I would buy just starting off is some sort of filter for your lens. I'll probably get yelled at for saying this here but its a great way to protect one of the most expensive parts of your kit. The filter will break and not the lens. When you start off you most likely wont even see the difference between having the filter on or not:

I originally bought this one because it was so cheap

http://www.amazon.com/Tiffen-52mm-UV-Protection-Filter/dp/B00004ZCJG/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1334116831&sr=1-1

I've bought this one for my other lenses

http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-DG-52mm-Multi-Coated-Filter/dp/B00009R6JT/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1334116831&sr=1-3

I just did a bunch of research on 82mm 10-stop filters. It seemed like in the end the best options were either to spend $150+ on a B+W, Lee etc filter, or go with something like this:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GNARENC/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

This product was kickstarted and got great reviews on Amazon and on the web. I mean, it's under $40 so I don't expect perfection but I'd rather spend my money elsewhere than super pricey filters that I will use only on a low % of shots.

As for polarizers, I use a Hoya that is mostly fine. Expensive though. I know someone else with an Amazon basics polarizer that they love - and it's super cheap.

I second the other posters idea to buy a large size and then use step-up rings to fit smaller lenses to it.

I use this one and it has been working like a charm for me.

This one. Thanks!

LimoStudio 700W Photography Softbox Light Lighting Kit Photo Equipment Soft Studio Light Softbox 24"X24", AGG814 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E4YS2XU/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_ZTQSzbVNKB89F

these lights are amazing. I agree with what someone else on this thread said about sound quality, if your using sound for films a good mic is a necessity.

Rode VMPR VideoMic Pro R with Rycote Lyre Shockmount https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00YAZHRZM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_iXQSzbKQ519VP

This mic is pretty good for recording, your also going to need a boom pole. For the lenses ND filters are a must as well, get these and some stopping down filter rings for your lenses. The lenses someone listed down below look pretty good

https://www.amazon.com/TELESIN-Filter-Neutral-Density-Accessories/dp/B07F193DFQ

i would go for a Sony VCT-R100
it's only 700 grams (1.5 lb), but it's not very tall, only 1 meter (40 inches)

I use lens filters for my digital camera, I would look into seeing what you can use on a drone.

EDIT: Here is a video to explain it for drones. Just buy some off Amazon and test it out.

https://youtu.be/1-D9DkFV0JI

Cheapest Amazon filters I found:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XYL8RW4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_p51SCbECAXC6Q

Go Stingrays!

Good luck to your daughter and thanks for the contest!

Wow, thanks for such a detailed response and one with images you took! I am indeed mainly wanting to use the nd filter for long exposures but I am also kinda interested in using one for keeping up the correct shutter speed while shooting video in high light situations like this video talks about. If I had to pick one or the other though I would definitely pick getting it for long exposure photography since I don't really shoot video that much right now. As for solid nd filters I was looking at the Tiffen 0.9 ND Filter (I also saw that they have a 0.6).

I bought [this set](http://www.Neewer.com/ 4 Pieces Filter Kit for DJI Mavic Pro Drone Quadcopter Includes: ND4, ND8, ND16 and ND32 Filter, Made of Multi Coated Waterproof Aluminum Alloy Frame Optical Glass (MC-16) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XYL8RW4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_5ns8AbQHZD7W0) for my Mavic Pro. They work well so far. The construction is definitely cheaper than the Polar Pro from what I understand but they fit my needs fine. I haven't had any problems with them and I'm happy with the quality for the price.

I have no idea if these work on the air.

I'm only about 1.5 years into DSLR photography, but I'm a meteorologist, so storm chasing and weather photography is most of what I do. It's all dependent on your camera and what time of day it is. If it's day time, you're going to need a good neutral density filter, narrow aperture, and low ISO. Then just adjust your shutter speed as needed so you don't get overexposed. This will be most dependent on the ND filter you get. Hoya makes a good one.

For night time, it really depends on the frequency of your strikes and how fast your camera can write to your card. In my experience, I find that I would rather take more shots at 8-10 seconds than 30 second exposures because my camera takes longer to write that 30 second exposure to the card before it's ready to take another picture. That time it's writing to the card is time wasted where a strike could be happening that I'm missing. You be the judge...if you have a ton of lightning, you may be okay with that. But then again, if you have a ton of lightning, you also may have too much light to do a 30 second exposure.

Settings wise, in my experience at night, F/8 - F/11...ISO of 100 and an exposure of about 10 seconds is usually what I start with and go from there. The more frequent the strikes, the more "exposed" your shot is going to be so you'll have to tweak things while you're out there. Your shot may not look right until a strike lights up the sky. Get yourself a remote trigger and just keep firing over and over again so you don't have any time where you're not shooting.

If I can recommend a good radar app, get RadarScope. It is the best radar app for iOS/Android out there. Yes, it is $10, but I use this while storm chasing as radar in my vehicle. Highly recommend it. It doesn't have lightning data in it, but it will at least tell you if you can stay outside long enough to keep dry. It's the cadillac of radar apps. Of course there are plenty of free alternatives that will do you just fine as well.

Of course, all of this is my camera (a Nikon) and my experience. Yours may vary entirely. I see this shot was F/4, 30 seconds and ISO 100. I think I have a lot more light pollution than you do. :)

I've used these on a medium format film camera for a few months and had no reason to complain. I'm sure they're nowhere near the best, but since I don't find myself using an ND all that often and they're dirt cheap I've got no regrets.

I want to buy an ND filter for daytime long exposures, but can't decide on what to get.

At first, variable ND filters made sense - because they would enable me to shoot wide open in daily shots, besides long exposures. I'm a hobbyist, so the little degradation in quality with vari-NDs wouldn't have mattered, but the x pattern issue really discouraged me from wanting one.

Anyway, I can't decide between these three ND filters:
Hoya
B+W
Another, more expensive B+W - what's the difference between this and the previous one?

And here were the vari-NDs I was considering:
Tiffen
*Light Craft Workshop

As I said, I don't think the vari-NDs are for me.. but which of the other 3 would you recommend? Any loss in sharpness and contrast? Any color casting?

I would not prefer to go up to the pricey B+W's range of $150, but if there's a big difference in image quality compared to the other two, I just may choose that one.

Do you have a link to where you bought them? Are you sure they're for GoPro? With a Hero6 camera, your ND filters should be square, as they replace the front lens cover, like this. The only round ones I've seen for the Hero5-7 line come with an adapter accessory to fit over the lens housing for a 52mm DSLR-style filter kit like this

There are older styles for the older cameras, which pressed onto the lens of the cameras where the lens was exposed all the time.

It looks like what you're using is something like this, which isn't for your model of camera. Are you sure you didn't buy a kit for Hero4 and are trying to press the filter onto the lens of your camera after you took the lens cover off? Because that's what it looks like to me.

No. these https://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-Close-Up-Macro-Filter-Pouch/dp/B004DRCEDW

I am looking for some advice on Neutral Density Filters.

I know what they do, but I am lost on whether to buy a variable, or a set of them. I have looked at some of the costs for variables, and at this time the only one I would feel comfortable purchasing is this one which will go up to 9 stops.

I was also looking at this set which will do 2,3 & 4 stops.

With no past experience with them, I am hoping someone can give me some insight. I know there are far better (and more expensive) versions, but for now I would just like to test the waters.

Thanks very much

It's a Tiffen ND9 I purchased from Amazon

http://www.amazon.com/Tiffen-52mm-Neutral-Density-Filter/dp/B00004ZCB5/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1324350095&sr=8-4

This is the official Cokin P size holder, you have to buy adapter rings to match your lenses separately but those are just as cheap. This is a copy one that comes with the holder, a load of adapter rings, GND/ND filters and a filter pouch, i can't say for sure if that would hold the welding glass but for £12 it's not a bad deal.

These are the macro filters I have: http://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-Close-Up-Macro-Filter-Pouch/dp/B004DRCEDW

I figured they weren't the greatest thing ever, but they were $10... I figured why not? I haven't played with them a ton, but they do seem to work. If I end up doing a bunch of macro I may look into extension tubes instead.

I had a feeling the UV filter probably wasn't helping much, I'll take that off.

Pretty much anything by Tiffen will be suitable. For example, a ND 0.9 (3 stops reduction) 52mm filter is $15. (Different sizes here.) Tiffen are not expensive because the color comes from plastic laminated between glass - but that also means they're far more consistent and neutral than more expensive stained glass models.

Also: Know that there are several different grades of ND filters, typically 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 (the number refers to the proportion of light they cut out) - and that a graduated neutral density filter is something completely different.

Also #2: obviously buy the size that fits your camera (the filter size of the lens is marked with a "∅" symbol, so it might read "∅52" meaning 52mm); and if you have a range of lenses, consider buying for the largest size you'll need (say, 77mm) - then getting a step-up ring so your smaller lens can mount the larger filter.

Also #3: if you're a seriously dedicated professional who'll be using filters daily, consider one of the larger square filter systems - but the cost of entry is considerably more than $50.

No. You need a 67mm filter like [this one] (https://www.amazon.com/Concept-Variable-Neutral-Adjustable-Cleaning/dp/B00JL4INW8//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) to fit the threads in front of your lens. I found the filter size by looking at the Sigma product page [here] (https://www.sigmaphoto.com/article/new-product-sigma-16mm-f14-dc-dn-contemporary).

Hope this solves your problem!

neutral density filter go pro

Thank You! Do you think these filters from neweer would help?

https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Camera-Lens-Filter-GoPro/dp/B074V76DWB/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=filter+gopro&qid=1551064641&s=gateway&sr=8-5

I'm new to photography and I have a Nikon D3200.

I want to buy some filters but I don't really know what to buy.

I want to know if this kit is any good to

http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B00A7U15V6/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=12CHW0SLXX3F4&coliid=I1Y5LOA4437I2T

Basically I want to use it for my skies and for the water/waterfalls

I suggest that you do not buy an expensive macro lens just now. Start with a very cheap option - screw on lenses and see if macro is your thing. The quality will not be amazing but they are really cheap. https://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-VIV-CL-52-Close-up-52mm-Lens/dp/B004E54LBQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1496798054&sr=8-2&keywords=close+up+lens+52mm

A basic UV filter, cheap ones can add funny flair, but they can be removed quickly and easily. If I take the filter off I generally make sure to use a lens hood.

I have a set of close up filters for macro photography and I'm wondering if I put it a few in front of a piece of paper in the direct path of the sun if it'll show the eclipse. Or do I still need an aperture?

These are the filters:
I have the +1,+2 and +4
https://www.amazon.ca/Vivitar-Close-Up-Macro-Filter-Pouch/dp/B004DRCEDW/ref=sr_1_6?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1503176242&sr=1-6&keywords=58mm+macro+filter

Thanks!

I'm looking for a ND square filter set, I've heard they can be really expensive too, but I found these ones online for pretty cheap. Do you think I'm really getting what I pay for, or is it just a great deal? Here's the two I've found so far...


One


And the other


I'd get the one from aliexpress because theres more filters, but there really isn't a good description of the product and what kinds of filters it has. From the pictures they both seem kind of cheap anyway but I don't know what to expect because these are the epitome of what have been coming up when I search.

What I didn't realise at the time was that the genuine Cokin P-Series holder and adaptor rings weren't all that expensive. Even their filter sets are pretty cheap to be honest.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cokin-Full-ND-Filter-Kit/dp/B01HMWKXWS

https://www.amazon.co.uk/d/5fn/Cokin-BPW400A-P-W-Holder-plus-Cat/B0000C5RR5

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cokin-BP-400-P-Filter-Holder/dp/B000L47COM

I just use a cheap altura set from amazon Here

It definitely has a blue color cast to it but I can usually adjust it out when setting my white balance in lightroom.

I shoot documentary/brand/lifestyle films for larger brands. I use the Leica branded 42.5 f1.2 more than any other lens. The duel OIS works soooo good and I use it with this variable ND filter on the end so I can get nice soft focus in the sun: https://www.amazon.com/Concept-Variable-Neutral-Adjustable-Cleaning/dp/B00JL4INW8/ref=sr_1_3?crid=1W4IUG6OVS758&keywords=variable+nd+filter+67mm&qid=1550705847&s=gateway&sprefix=variable+nd+filter+67%2Caps%2C211&sr=8-3

I bought a set of Neewer ND filters + UV + CPL so it's 6 in total...~$30. I haven't gotten to test them out just yet but reviews were positive, price was excellent. The kit is nice, the filters look to be made of good quality and they install (push on) easily. I use ND/PL filters on my drone for videos and there is a noticeable benefit, I imagine the same result for the GoPro.

https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Camera-Lens-Filter-GoPro/dp/B074V76DWB

TELESIN GoPro Lens Filter -3Pack ND4 ,ND8 ,ND16 , Neutral Density Lens Filter Kit for GoPro Hero 7 Black Hero 2018 Hero 6 Hero 5 Black, GoPro Camera Lens Accessories (ND 4/8/16) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07F193DFQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_DLY0CbAWSEZC5

You'd want a ND filter for long(er) exposures during the day and at night that wouldn't be possible otherwise because of how much light there is. ND filters are basically sunglasses for your lens. There are graduated ones, too. My bet is that you don't need one.

But I'd recommend getting a CPL for that glare and reflection reduction and saturated blue skies! https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Circular-Polarizer-Lens-52/dp/B00XNMXNV0 is cheap and should give you an idea of the hows and whys in real life shooting situations. If you decide to get a 35mm f1.8 dx lens, your filter will also fit by the way, both are 52mm in diameter on the front.

You could try adding a polarizing filter in front of your webcam lens:

https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Circular-Polarizer-Lens-58/dp/B00XNMXYBY/

It will darken things, but at the correct rotation, it should get rid of most light reflecting from your monitor.

Or, move the webcam a little off-angle. Put it on the corner of your screen, may help.

Yeah, the 50mm is a mild tele on a crop sensor - perfect for some things, but a bit restrictive. The 24mm is great, and so cheap that it's hard to go wrong with it. Won't even save any money getting it used.

For cars (or other highly reflective things), a polarizer filter is a really great accessory. The pancake doesn't rotate as it focuses so it makes it easy to use.

52mm thread. Amazon has them for $10. Get a little step-up ring and you can use it with your nifty fifty too - which is very usable for car photography too, lots of opportunity for close-ups there.

https://www.amazon.com/Concept-Variable-Neutral-Adjustable-Cleaning/dp/B00JL4INW8/ref=mp_s_a_1_1_sspa?keywords=67mm+nd+filter+variable&qid=1568628673&sprefix=67mm+nd+&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzU00xWEcxVDZaTjBEJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODY5MDkzMjVKM1QxNFUxUjlNRiZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNjA5MzQ1MU9OVTRCWkhHNzRGTyZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX3Bob25lX3NlYXJjaF9hdGYmYWN0aW9uPWNsaWNrUmVkaXJlY3QmZG9Ob3RMb2dDbGljaz10cnVl

Red light gets absorbed by the water. You need to get a red filter to compensate for this. Something like this: https://www.amazon.com/Kupton-Underwater-Waterproof-Correction-Housing/dp/B075WR3ZTQ?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_4

>expensive ND-filter


ehhhh, they're not so bad. I have one of these which when stopped to F18 or so lets me get 20-25 second exposures in broad daylight.