(Part 2) Best dslr camers according to redditors

Jump to the top 20

We found 1,926 Reddit comments discussing the best dslr camers. We ranked the 446 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.

Next page

Top Reddit comments about DSLR Cameras:

u/link_4_the_lazy · 30 pointsr/videos
u/cialowicz · 23 pointsr/photography

Dental photos, huh?

Well, that implies a macro-ish range (although maybe not true 1:1), while taking photos of people. Since we're talking macro here, I'd suggest a crop camera, which will get you better reproduction ratios or deeper DOF given the same framing.

I'd also suggest getting something like a ring flash.

I'd go with this setup:

  • Nikon D7100. $1200.
  • Nikon 105mm f/2.8 VR micro - a great macro lens with good working distances. $880.
  • Closeup lighting, like this or this. $350-720.

    You're well under $3k there. Might even want to get the D7100 with the kit lens (18-105), so you can do more general photography while you're not working.

    Remember: lighting is very, very important. You'll get shit photos if you just blow the full $3k on a D800 and bottom-end macro lens with no lights. Mouths tend to be dark. Indoor areas are dark. Buy a good ring flash, and don't skimp out on a terrible macro lens. You need something at least 90mm or longer so you're not hitting people's teeth.
u/dmazzoni · 13 pointsr/legaladvice

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Digital SLR

"records to both SD and CF cards for versatility and security during important shoots"

alternatively, you can install a wi-fi adapter that uploads the photos while simultaneously saving them to a card.

u/Hundekuchen_ · 9 pointsr/pcmasterrace

Thanks :3

Camera: Canon EOS Rebel T1i, aka 500d

Lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8

The lens is mostly what gives this "depth of field" effect

u/BrandanG · 9 pointsr/cars

I use Canon because I had access to Canon lenses when I first started shooting cars, but Nikon also makes great cameras.

Right now a Canon T6 with an 18-55mm lens is $450. Add a 50mm f/1.8 and you can have a lot of fun shooting cars.

u/jonjiv · 7 pointsr/personalfinance

This is highly dependent on your price range, but if you're going to be in it for $500 prizes, I'm going to assume you'd like to spend less than $1000.

In that case, you can't really go wrong with a Canon dSLR, especially the t series, their entry level camera. I think the newest version is the Canon t5i, but the t4i and t3i also shoot high quality 1080p video and you'll be able to find them for cheaper.

The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera is increasingly popular in that price range, but I wouldn't recommend it to an amateur. It has a fantastic image but a high learning curve.

Nikon dSLR's are great too, but if you invest in Nikon lenses as a videographer, you're going to have a bad time. The majority of video camera bodies are manufactured for Canon mount lenses, so if you ever want to leave Nikon, you're kind of stuck or forced to use lens mount convertors.

With all of these cameras, lenses are arguably more important than the camera itself. With the Canon, the best bang for your buck is going to be a Canon 50mm 1.8. It's a cheap lens, but it has a great image for the price and is great in low light. If you can afford a good 2.8 zoom lens like the 17-55 2.8, go for it, but it's often near $1000.

u/HybridCameraRevoluti · 7 pointsr/Filmmakers

I agree with /u/indieforge. All you'll get out of the 70D is video autofocus and a 30 minute continuous recording limit. The video image quality is the same.

It is just as susceptible to moire, for example, as first generation Canon DSLRs, as seen in this side by side with the 60D:

http://vimeo.com/73429088

You might be better off saving up another $800 for a [7D Mark II] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Link] (fast video autofocus, moire resistant, 1080/60p, headphone jack - 30 minutes of continuous recording)

If you want to spend less and get more for your money, you might consider switching to a [$1500 GH4 mirrorless] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I9GYG8O/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00I9GYG8O&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Link] (moire resistant - headphone jack - 4K resolution - hours of continuous recording - 1080/96p - focus peaking - no need for an external viewfinder or EVF - $31 manual adapter for your Canon EF lenses [but not EF-S]).

Here is what this camera can do:

Documentary

http://vimeo.com/110605931

http://vimeo.com/102924266

Travel

http://vimeo.com/99041955

http://vimeo.com/99523009

96fps Slow Motion

http://vimeo.com/100955334

http://vimeo.com/97096167

Music Video

http://vimeo.com/98759306

You'll find many more examples of what the GH4 can do in the ["GH4K" group] (https://vimeo.com/groups/gh4k) I moderate over on Vimeo.

I own this camera and can recommend it without reservation.

Hope this is helpful!

HCR

u/GIS-Rockstar · 7 pointsr/photography
u/BrainSlurper · 6 pointsr/photography

I remember canon making a smaller t3i when the t4i was coming out. Looking for it now.


Edit: It's called the SL1

u/HybridCamRev · 6 pointsr/Filmmakers

/u/Seansieee - for less than the price of a [$1099 1080p Canon 80D body] (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Body-Black/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20), I recommend a [$997.99 4K, weather-sealed Panasonic G85 with the 12-60 kit lens, a free 64GB SD card and in-body image stabilization] (https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-Mirrorless-Interchangeable-Camera-Kit/dp/B01MXHN32J//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) plus a [$99.99 Commlite Canon EF/EF-S to micro 4/3 adapter] (https://www.amazon.com/Commlite-CM-EF-MFT-Electronic-Aperture-Panasonic/dp/B01324WKAS//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) [Referral Links] so you can use your Mom's Canon lenses.

This camera will give you 4 times higher video resolution than the 80D - plus in-body image stabilization for smooth handheld shots (which neither the 80D nor the G7 has).

Here is the image quality the G80/85 can produce:

u/rape_baby · 5 pointsr/AskPhotography

Brand new they hover around $500, so I'd personally decline that offer.

The 18-200 lens isn't great, and a new card/bag would be <$50.

e.g. Amazon price. See the used prices there? Much more sensible.

u/vanillawafercaper · 5 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

$500 left to go on this bad boy

u/cleansoap · 5 pointsr/photography

> The D400 will be priced around $1000

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D7100-24-1-DX-Format-Digital/dp/B00BI9X7UC

Nobody can agree on much about what the D400 should or will or if be, but you will not get a new D400 at $1000 before the end of inventory clearance sales. I never saw the D200 for less than $600 - and that was inventory clearance at the dawn of the 300s announcement (five years into the D200)


u/finaleclipse · 5 pointsr/photography

For $500, the Pentax K-50 body + 18-55mm WR lens + 50-200mm WR lens is one of the better bargains out there. It comes with the body + two lenses, and the entire kit is weather sealed (which may come in handy if you're planning on being outdoors a lot and the weather turns nasty).

If you're looking for something smaller, lighter, and still a DSLR, but lacks weather resistance and comes with 1 lens instead of two, the Canon SL1/100D + 18-55mm is another option.

Finally, if you want even smaller, there's mirrorless cameras which trade size and weight for worse battery life compared to DSLRs. Something like the Olympus E-PL7 + 14-42mm would be a decent start.

u/rustyorcweapon · 5 pointsr/orlando

For those interested, I used a Nikon D5300 with a 55-200 mm lens, 2 sec exposure, 400 ISO.

u/Chroko · 4 pointsr/photography

Nikon D40 - $409. This is an incredible camera for the price, the next real step up costs $1000 more.

Spend maybe $20 on a UV / protection filter and a 4GB SDHC card - save the rest.

When you've got a bit of experience, you'll know if you want a basic telephoto zoom to get a little closer to your subjects - or something a little more exotic for low-light indoor shooting.

Just be aware that there will always be more expensive and complicated equipment to tempt you. Remember that the skills and creativity of the operator are the most important factor in producing good art. So long as your camera isn't complete junk - upgrades and fancy lenses may be fun to play with - but they won't magically improve the quality of your pictures.

u/eldirte · 4 pointsr/photography

Nikon D40. Great pictures, has most features you would ever need, relatively compact size and lightweight. Best of all it's in your price range. The reviews speak for themselves. The 18-55mm AF lens is pretty good too.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Zoom-Nikkor/dp/B000KJQ1DG

Have a look on Adorama for D40 bundles too.

u/stevekeiretsu · 4 pointsr/travel

Bear in mind the smallest and lightest DSLRs are still bigger and heavier than compacts - plus a big reason for DSLRs is the ability to change lens, so if you carry additional lenses - there is really no escaping that being a DSLR photographer involves a commitment to more weight / 'hassle'. Your budget is also maybe a bit low (considering again once you get into DLSR you soon find yourself wanting new lenses).

On the other hand you have a range "Compact System Cameras" now which promise a middle ground between DLSR quality (bigger sensors, range of lenses) and compacts (smaller and lighter).

http://www.which.co.uk/technology/photography/guides/compact-system-cameras-explained/

To compare within the same brand, take for example (CSC) Canon EOS M: 1.3 x 4.3 x 2.6 inches; 9.3 ounces; $299.00 - versus the (DSLR) EOS 60D with standard kit lens: 5.7 x 4.2 x 3.1 inches; 1.7 pounds; $899.00.

No particular reason for mentioning Canon by the way (I actually have a Nikon), nor am I trying to dissuade you from DSLR, but it seems like a CSC might fit your requirements a little easier.

u/genuinearticle · 4 pointsr/Cameras

The D7100 would probably be the best fit. The D90 was replaced with the D7000. You could also look at the D7200 if you wanted to go another step up, although it costs a little more.

u/AzuLL · 4 pointsr/photography

I went backpacking for 5 days in the Sierra Nevada's 2 years back. Got some great shots with a Samsung Galaxy S3 if you can believe it. Airplane mode and dimming screen brightness made the battery last, got good panoramas. Now I've been sucking it up and bringing my DSLR. If your willing to lug, check out a Pentax K50, weather sealed, weather sealed kit lens, for about [400] (http://amzn.com/B00DBPKAAG). Otherwise I've heard good things about the Ricoh GR, the Sony Rx100 series, and Fuji x100s.

u/ItsMeEntropy · 4 pointsr/photography

I was going to recommend a Canon, but I don't think there are any Canon DSLR bodies under $700 that can do 1080p@60fps (Only 30 fps). So your choices for #1 would either be the Nikon D3300 or the Nikon D5300. Image quality wise, they should be exactly the same (they use the same sensor), however the D5300 has a flippy screen (useful for video), a better autofocus system (for stills), and wifi. I don't usually recommend the D5300 over the D3300 because I don't find these three features worth the $200-300 difference in price, but in your case it's what fits your criteria: D5300.

Disclaimer for camera #2: I'm not too well versed in Nikon point and shoots (and point and shoots in general), so I don't have as much confidence in this recommendation. With that said, point and shoots, especially in this price range, tend to all be very similar in feature sets and performance. It's going to be a bit tricky to find a point and shoot under $300 with 1080p@60 FPS, I'm not sure if it even exists. The closest Nikon camera I can find is the Coolpix S7000, 1080 @ 60i.

u/admiraljohn · 3 pointsr/photography

Some rectangular 110 camera that I had as a teenager.

My first digital camera was this bad boy that my mother bought me in 2002. I used it until 2007 when my father bought me this camera for my birthday and I was quite content with it. But in 2009 I took it to an airshow and I realized how much I really enjoyed photography and how much the camera's limitations held me back (no Raw and annoying shutter-lag being the main things).

I saved up some money and bought myself this camera, which I recently upgraded with this one that my father sent me as an early Christmas present.

That was probably more than you wanted to know. :)

u/Obi_Kwiet · 3 pointsr/funny

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-XS-Digital-18-55mm-Black/dp/B001CBKJGG/ref=sr_1_2?m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1313446591&sr=1-2

Actually about 473 - 250 = 223$, or even less when you consider the fact that the cannon comes with a lens that you would have to buy separately with the iPhone adapter.

Or none, over a moderately priced point and shoot which will still be far better than the iPhone sensor and lens.

u/watsoned · 3 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

1.) [Something that is grey.]
(http://www.amazon.com/ThinkGeek-Minecraft-Note-Cube/dp/B005GMWAOQ/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=I2MKPWR46VCNAV) (Main WL)

2.) Something reminiscent of rain.

3.) [Something food related that is unusual.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Shady-Maple-Farms-Organic-Stroopwafel/dp/B002HQERCM/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=2VCRE2W8VCMM7&coliid=I3JA1YGZR61PNX) (Feed Me WL)

4.) [Something on your list that is for someone other than yourself. Tell me who it's for and why. (Yes, pets count!)]
(http://www.amazon.com/LEGO-DUPLO-Princess-Undersea-Castle/dp/B00A88EP9Q/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=GG0TDT1M6D60&coliid=I2SQZ4UMA01M8G) (Niece/Nephews WL)

For my niece! Because she loves LEGO and she's obsessed with Little Mermaid.

5.) [A book I should read! I am an avid reader, so take your best shot and tell me why I need to read it!]
(http://www.amazon.com/Longmire-Mystery-Series-Boxed-Volumes/dp/0147508770/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=19GY5YG4ALBHP&coliid=I2RQ3KT5XJD3MR) (Books WL)

All of these! The characterization is so much fun, the mystery itself is great...I got addicted to this entire series.

6.) An item that is less than a dollar, including shipping... that is not jewelry, nail polish, and or hair related!

Nope.

7.) [Something related to cats. I love cats! (keep this SFW, you know who you are...)]
(http://www.amazon.com/Armarkat-B5701-57-Inch-Tree-Ivory/dp/B003BYQ100/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=2DFWCO414C0RT&coliid=I143IEDBCBUABI) (Cats WL)

8.) [Something that is not useful, but so beautiful you must have it.]
(http://www.amazon.com/United-Cutlery-UC1264-LOTR-Sting/dp/B00062BO7U/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=2RKYWCYW31M08&coliid=ITZAAOEK7L109) (Pipe Dreams WL)

9.) [A movie everyone should watch at least once in their life. Why?]
(http://www.amazon.com/Stand-25th-Anniversary-Edition-Blu-ray/dp/B00164GDA0/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=14ENPLB26HMQU&coliid=I172GKBYIDX0SZ) (Movies WL)

It's the perfect 'coming of age' movie. Featuring two actors who are still active and well known, and two we lost too soon.

10.) [Something that would be useful when the zombies attack. Explain.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Spectre-Compact-Take-down-Survival-Arrow/dp/B003O98OJI/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=2RKYWCYW31M08&coliid=I2E8WI49EDG9BU)
A silent killer. Capable (I think) of skewering an undead brain. What more is there to explain? (Pipe Dreams WL)

11.) Something that would have a profound impact on your life and help you to achieve your current goals.

I have no goals right now. Sigh.

12.) [One of those pesky Add-On items.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Village-Naturals-Shoppe-Vanilla-Amber/dp/B001PLH58I/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=I1LPIJLUADQUO6) (Main WL)

13.) [The most expensive thing on your list. Your dream item. Why?]
(http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Digital-Camera-24-105mm/dp/B007FGZ1V0/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=2RKYWCYW31M08&coliid=I2HDOC9WS17GPM) (Pipe Dreams WL)

It's a major upgrade from the camera I have now. I have no USE for it since my camera is nice, but damn do I drool over it.

14.) [Something bigger than a bread box.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Piece-Queen-GREEN-BEIGE-Comforter/dp/B00AH397MC/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=I13G5R4KW7DZ5C) (Main WL)

15.) [Something smaller than a golf ball.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Kingdom-Hearts-Avatar-Mascot-Figure/dp/B002RT8N4M/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=I1XTE6YT1EJ1CT) (Main WL)
Tiny Vivi!

16.) [Something that smells wonderful.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Morning-Star-Lavender-Incense-Sticks/dp/B001B67TD8/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=IKK20VKTRHL1D) (Main WL)

17.) [A (SFW) toy.]
(http://www.amazon.com/LEGO-Minifigure-Collection-Series-Mystery/dp/B003LQMFOY/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=30PMJOCYEK1SN&coliid=I3DQVVIEVUAAHK) (LEGO WL)

18.) [Something that would be helpful for going back to school.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Asus-A55VD-AH71-ASUS-15-6-Inch-Laptop/dp/B009M2XB6M/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1P0WLUX7HZM88&coliid=I1XMKVRS88GQGV) (Main WL)

19.) [Something related to your current obsession, whatever that may be.]
(http://www.amazon.com/Burn-Notice-Season-Six/dp/B0060MYLCU/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pd_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=14ENPLB26HMQU&coliid=I5YQM2A3MEDGS) (Movies WL)

BURN NOTICE

20.) [Something that is just so amazing and awe-inspiring that I simply must see it. Explain why it is so grand.]
(http://www.amazon.com/PlayStation-4-PS4-Standard-Edition/dp/B00CMQTVQO/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=1XFZ5B9UHNEEK&coliid=I20LPXNM34AJ3U) (High Priority WL)

It's the PS4. Any gamer worth their weight knows that this is going to be one of the grandest, most desirable gaming systems ever. The graphics are going to be just amazing and we'll be one step closer to games being so realistic that we feel like murderers while playing them.

ETA: fear cuts deeper than swords

u/jam6618 · 3 pointsr/videography

Yeah, what is your budget? A bunch of the main stream DSLRs work with the video mic go even though they do not state plug in power. The Canon T3i, T4i, T5i, and T6i all work with it. The Panasonic Lumix GH3, GH4, G7, and G85 all work with it. The Canon 5D Mk3 works with it. The Nikon D800 works with it. A whole bunch more cameras work with it but we can't give you a good recommendation unless you give us a budget.

u/AlanBeforeTime · 3 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

Bora Bora I mean look at how beautiful it is

Obviously wherever the pic is taken in.

Ill take this camera to take amazing pictures

I'll take my family

u/snowylambeau · 3 pointsr/Cameras

Canon’s model numbers go in reverse of what one might expect, at least with the EOS lines and I assume with the Rebel lines too. So the 5 is a higher model than the 6. If you’re asking why they do this, I don’t know.

If you’re asking what the difference between the two is, google “Compare Canon Rebel 5 and Rebel 6” and you’ll probably find a selection of charts that are more concise than anything you’ll get here.

For the price, you can’t go too wrong with a Rebel, but the Canon compact system is also popular.

Long exposure for sunsets isn’t necessary but there’s room for experimentation. For long exposure you need a tripod of some kind.

Fun fact: cameras are duty free. You may find value ordering one in to TSB at Point Roberts.

u/bgaddis88 · 3 pointsr/DSLR

Not at all.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Compact-Systems-3-0-Inch-EF-M18-55mm/dp/B00A2BVCO0/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1375304495&sr=8-3&keywords=canon+eos+m+22mm

That isn't a DSLR, it's mirrorless, but it seems very cool. $350 for the camera with 18-55 lens

or $399

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/883304-REG/Canon_6609b033_EOS_M_Digital_Camera_with.html

for the camera with the 22mm f/2 lens. I would get the 22mm f/2 lens. My friend just bought this camera and he hasn't got it out yet to use it but being that it's from canon and looking at the specs of it I'm sure it'll take very very quality photos. Again, it's DSLR and I realize that we're in the DSLR subreddit, but mirrorless does have some cool advantages over DSLR. The size of this is pretty awesome as well since you'd be way more likely to carry this thing with you than lug around a clunky DSLR (at least I know I would be)

Idk, that's just what I would get if I was looking in the 300 to 400 price range. I don't think you'll find a new APS-C size sensor body + lens for less than that.

u/unrealkoala · 3 pointsr/photography

You might be able to nab a Nikon D7100 and a Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 II for about that price.

You're basically looking for a fast wide angle which would cover architecture, astrophotography, and landscapes. You're going to be lacking a medium zoom, but perhaps you can save up for that later. Don't forget a tripod at some point!

u/rillick · 3 pointsr/photography

I haven't shot with either but the recently discontinued Pentax K-50 and the Nikon D3300 get mentioned a lot.

u/decorama · 3 pointsr/Cameras

It sounds like you're looking for a quality entry level DSLR. There are many to choose from. Here are a few:

u/tattlestation · 3 pointsr/photography

I think that the Pentax K50 is the current best entry-level DSLR right now, especially with the recent price drop. Build quality wise it dominates, with a huge, bright viewfinder, full weathersealing for rainy weather, and a solid feeling, ergonomic body. The lens mount retains compatibility back to the 60s, so there's a lot of cheap lenses to pick up. The only area where it falls behind is video features - not quality, mind you, features. You're not going to get a swiveling screen or automatic autofocus during video, which is a bit of a pain for vlogging purposes.

And yeah, a DLSR will provide an incredible improvement in image quality. Taking good pictures is still up to you, but a good camera makes it a lot easier.

u/brunerww · 3 pointsr/videography

Hi /u/deseete - Here's another vote for the [~$648 (with kit lens) Panasonic G6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20).

If you want to make documentaries, sometimes you'll want to keep the camera running for more than 12 (or 30) minutes for long interviews or events.

You may also want to use in-camera slow motion to emphasize the beauty of a dancer or the grace of a skateboarder. The [G6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) is the only camera on your list with 1080/60fps high definition, high frame rate internal recording. The rest of the cameras on your list are limited to 1080/30fps.

It's also the only camera in your updated list with an electronic viewfinder (EVF) that keeps working while you're shooting video. All of the other cameras have mirrors that block their optical viewfinders when you switch to video ("Live View") mode. This forces you to use the LCD for composition and focus. That's OK when you're indoors, but outdoors in bright sunlight, this can be a problem. Many shooters buy either an eyepiece for their LCD (also called a "loupe" or LCD Viewfinder) or an external EVF - but this can be expensive.

The [G6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) is also the only camera on your list with fast, silent camcorder-like video autofocus. The T3i loses its autofocus function when you switch to live view, Pentax video autofocus is slow and Nikon lenses are noisy. Many people will pooh-pooh the need for video autofocus, but anyone who has ever shot with a camcorder knows that it makes life a lot easier when you can just pull the viewfinder up to your eye, point the camera at the subject and press the record button without worrying about focus hunting or the sound of the autofocus motor.

Here's a mini-documentary made with the [G6] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) and the kit lens: http://vimeo.com/73561266

Here's a slow motion video shot at 1080/60p: http://vimeo.com/76503135

And it takes pretty good stills too: https://www.flickr.com/groups/lumix-g6/pool/

For stills only, I'd probably get the [~$584 weather-sealed Pentax K-50] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DBPKAAG/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00DBPKAAG&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) - but it's not a very good video camera (it doesn't even have a mic input).

But for video and stills, the Panasonic G6 ([$646.82 on eBay] (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575034783&toolid=10001&campid=5337235943&customid=&icep_item=321299886402&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg) and [$647.99 at Amazon] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) as of this post) is probably the best value for your money.

Hope this is helpful and welcome to the world of hybrid still/video cameras!

Bill

u/riahxoxo · 3 pointsr/photography

I have a Canon EOS Rebel T5 and would love some tutorial/class/resources for stepping up my game.

Some resources regarding pet photography would also be very welcome, since I volunteer at the local shelter and was drafted as the unofficial cat photographer, ha.

u/bigboiahoy · 3 pointsr/DSLR

I have the Canon 80d and like it. It’s a good well rounder and my only complaint is the low light performance (however the lens could have something to do with this). However I will mention this is $1000. An option I see often (never have used myself) and is cheaper ($500-$900) is the Sony A6000 or the Sony A6300 (or a newer model). These are mirrorless and when you look at the viewfinder and make changes, that is what the image will look like. The A6300 might be more future proof with its 4K video if video is of interest. These would be good photo options from what I can tell (but again take that with a grain of salt since I’ve only used the 80d). If you are interested in more video vs photography another cheaper option would be the Panasonic G7 and is 4K. I cannot speak for Nikon, but they seem like good budget cameras, but may be lacking video wise. But overall the glass will make more of a difference than the camera! Any of these options would be a step up from your smartphone!

Camera links (Amazon)
Sony Alpha a6000
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00I8BICB2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_7eQkDbQD2A5PY

Sony Alpha a6300
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007GK50X4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_5gQkDbYD1ET6T

Panasonic G7
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00X409PQS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_aiQkDbKSNBTTR

Canon 77D (80D alternative)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06VSTCWJ9/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_4kQkDbJGAEWNA

Canon 80D
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_ZjQkDbTAJB668

u/Mix_HD · 3 pointsr/cinematography

It really depends what are the features you need. The G80/85 is a great camera for the price and will serve great. Another alternative is Sony a6300. £850 for body and with kit lens its £1003. Not a bad option depending what you need and if you're ready to deal with the problems of having a Sony system.

Sony a6300 Video Review by DSLR Video Shooter

Sony A6300 - Review after 3 months! Almost perfect budget Camera by Max Yuryev

G85 vs A6500 - Best option for film making? by Max Yuryev

Another alternative is Canon 80D

Field Test

u/kabbage123 · 3 pointsr/videography

Yes, you made a mistake.

I loved my GH4 but it's only really usable if you can handle manual focus.

I would return/sell it and consider purchasing a used C100 with Dual Pixel Autofocus. Canon has the best autofocus in the business. If you are patient, you may be able to snag one at an amazing price.

Otherwise, you might want to just consider getting a Canon 80D. You won't get 4k but I don't think you really need it.

Links in this post are affiliate links. If I helped you out, consider helping me by using them to make your purchase.

u/psychedelianaut · 3 pointsr/LSD

Thanks!

Was shot on a Canon EOS Rebel T6 body, using a Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX lens : )

u/EventuallyGreat · 3 pointsr/photography

You can get a new Canon Rebel T6 with a 18-55mm (good for landscapes and people) + 70-300mm (good for daytime shots of wildlife) + camera bag for $550 on Amazon.

I'd say go for this bundle since it would meet your immediate needs on the road. The camera is easy to learn on so you won't be spending months figuring out what the dozens of buttons and dials do on higher-level cameras. Either way, you're going to need a camera bag and a longer zoom lens, so its good to get it right now and just gradually upgrade lenses and bags later on. Additional things you'll need are a few SD cards and batteries.

There are plenty of second-hand cameras available online, but choosing one out can be daunting if you don't know what to look for.

u/eirtep · 3 pointsr/barstoolsports

what's your budget?

I think mirrorless micro 4/3rds cameras from Panasonic or Olympus are pretty great casual cameras cause they're great quality cameras packed into a small and compact body/lens system. The pansonic G7 comes to mind, but they have lower budget/entry models as well. There are other options tho - I'd check out these 3 decent starter cameras:

Panasonic m43 mirrorless:

Pansonic g7



Sony APS-C mirrorless:

Sony A6000



Canon APS-C DSLR:

Canon t7i


I think a million people may have had t#i as their first budget camera. it's good but at this point that series is kinda shit for the price point imo. Canon's prosumer/pro cameras are still great for photo but Sony and Panasonic imo crush them in budget/entry level stuff and are better at any price point for combined photo+video use.

u/LanaCallKennyLoggins · 3 pointsr/photography

Budget: <$700

Use: Portraits & pets still photography and sports filming

---


My wife has been interested in photography for a while now but has never had more than point & shoots to work with. I'm looking at getting a DSLR she can learn with. I'd like spend less than $700 on camera and lens.

For the most part she's gonna be taking pictures of people, just spontaneous friends & family as well as of our two dogs.

I plan to use the camera as well, 7 years ago when I was in HS I did some formal video training. It's been a while and I've forgotten most of it but I'm interested in getting back into it and being able to do some light filming with the camera. Mostly I'd be filming sports (kickboxing/brazilian jiu jitsu/mma) so I'm thinking autofocus and 1080p60 would be my preference.

I read through the FAQ and had my eye on a used Canon Rebel T7i on Amazon.

Looking for opinions or suggestions!

---
Edit: Is the whole black friday/cyber monday a thing in the camera market? Should I be looking for deals around Thanksgiving?

u/ViZi9 · 3 pointsr/Cameras

It does actually, it's called the SL2 in the US though but here in my region it's called the 200D.
A link for the model I'm talking about: https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-DSLR-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B071K62DPN

u/GuilhermeFreire · 3 pointsr/DSLR

for around this price you don't really have a lot of choices.

You can find a Canon T5 or with some luck a T6

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=psdc_3017941_t2_B01LQMI4V2

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XNTPN8C/ref=psdc_3017941_t2_B00IB1BTWI

or the Nikon 3300

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3300-AF-P-18-55mm-Digital/dp/B01JN28QQA/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1518111206&sr=1-3&keywords=nikon+D3300

And the sony offer in this price range is the 5100, that is a mirrorless, nor a DSLR.



I do prefer the Canon, but mostly because I have a Canon and lots of accessories. I bought a T6 for my sister so she can borrow what she needs.

Used market is a mess... Sometimes you get a Canon 5D for 300, and sometimes you can't even get a T5i... And you never know about the shutter, if it is busted or working fine.

Buy new or refurbished, it is "safer".

I would consider a little bit higher price point and maybe a mirrorless.

u/Charwinger21 · 2 pointsr/photography

>I’ve been looking at the cannon rebel t6i package which runs around $750-$800.

Honestly, that's a tad bit pricy for the t6i. (Unless that is with 2+ lenses).

>Not bad for everything I think I’d need including multiple lenses, sd cards, carrying case etc.

Most of the bundled items will be crap.

>However I talked to one of my friends who’s a professional photographer and shoots multiple weddings weekly and he told me that I should not get the rebel. Reasons being that supposedly they need to be upgraded every couple years.

That's only true if you're shooting thousands of pictures a week (which he is).

Even sensors from 10 years ago are still pretty good for casual use (and there are diminishing returns on further upgrades).

>He recommended that I buy a professional camera instead because they’re more durable and it will save me a lot of money in the long run.

Not really.

For the price of one D500, you can get a t6i and two replacement bodies in the future.

It'll last longer, but it won't save you money.

>Now since I’ve never shot before and this is just for fun as a hobby I’m not sure I can justify spending $1K+ for just the body of something along the lines of a 80D. If what he says holds to be true though then I suppose I’ll just bite the bullet.
>
>What do people think? I mean I could spend $1200 and get an 80D with the lens he recommended (50mm 1.8) or buy the rebel t6i for $800 that comes with everything.

The 50mm f/1.8 STM (not the older 50 mm f/1.8 lenses) is a great purchase at $100. I highly recommend it if you go with Canon.

A t6i or T7i (or an A6000, G85, E-M10 III, X-T20, or D3400) would be a better option for a beginner though.

It doesn't have the extra pro features, but it does what you need for much cheaper.

u/StryderXGaming · 2 pointsr/Twitch

The Brio can't even touch a DSLR in the quality it puts out. For the cost of getting a brio, and the proper lighting to make it not look like ass you can get the Canon up and running. I was using the Brio and I just switched to DSLR and here's what I use.


---------------------------------
Camera :

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B071K62DPN/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s05?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Lens :

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006MI1T4A/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Power Adapter :

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B074K181L8/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Capture Device :

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07K3FN5MR/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

--------------------------------------

You obviously don't need the lens I use I just have a large room I am dedicating to streaming and making look nice so I wanted a wide angle. The power adapter works great. I even left my camera on and running over a weekend last week doing nothing. And the adapter is cheaper than the Brio alone.

So assuming you have any lens on your camera ~$135 and you're good to go. Yes you will still need lighting but you can get $10 worth of lighting a packing paper for a diffusion and be good if you have a camera with a larger sensor than any webcam can provide.

Here are two links to previous stream clips. One with the Brio and lighting the 2nd with my DSLR and the same lighting.

u/Sixteenbit · 2 pointsr/photography

A few years ago, I'd have said the Canon T5i or any of the Rebel T line, but now I'm super impressed by the SL2's ability to just lay everything out there for beginners.

The SL2 has an upgraded sensor, wifi, visual menus, and retails at a very reasonable price. A very good pick for first camera and contrary to popular belief, it does come in black. I'd say give this camera a try and pick up the 40mm 2.8 lens while you're at it. The body, kit lens, and 40mm will serve you well for most settings until you're ready to upgrade.

Both the white and black are listed for about $600. This might seem like a lot for the first time, but this is very reasonable for this kit. It's an excellent camera.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-DSLR-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B071K62DPN


Edit: I see that your budget is 100-400 usd. It might be better to save just a little longer to get a full kit instead of going lower. You can get an older model camera on ebay for that much, but it might not be good to learn on.
For instance, you can pick up a second hand Lumix G3 (I wouldn't go G1 or G2) for $150, and the kit lens (14-42mm) second hand in good condition for another $100. This brings it in at $250, but you're not going to get the most out of the camera unless you really read up. There are also some features that you will miss out on like wifi and an all-day battery life. Pixel count is much lower as well. It's up to you if you want to wait just a little more, but I Think that might be the better play in this case. $600 is a good low point to start at.

u/inverse_squared · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

I agree. Skip the lens. If you can afford a little more, I would also look at the Canon SL2 instead:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-DSLR-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B071K62DPN

u/BeardedCanadianEazer · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

The Canon SL2 is on sale right now in Canada might be too in the USA, 600$ great camera I love mine.
https://www.amazon.ca/Canon-Rebel-DSLR-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B071K62DPN

u/Dick_Lazer · 2 pointsr/videography

Sure, but I mean it doesn't have to be a t3i, I just meant to shop around a bit and that you don't necessarily need the latest model when these are essentially all 1080p cameras with pretty similar sensors & bodies. This one seems like a good deal right now though ($355) and has wifi: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XNTPN8C/

u/theatre_kiddo · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

I would go to Las Vegas and stay at the MGM Grand. I've always wanted to see a show at Cirque Du Soleil. I would bring my boyfriend along with me. I would bring [this awesome camera] (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000KJQ1DG/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=17EDOD53W0EYL&coliid=I1DADLZAB6AXTI) with me to document all my adventures.

I'm not sure how many days that much money would cover, but I'm going to guess at least 2-4 days.

u/justabaldguy · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

You're talking stills of moving objects? Mine is pretty good. I didn't review all the specs on the Canon but it's probably average to decent. It's not a shoot-through (you look at the back display to take your picture instead of an eyepiece) which typically slows everything down. This is what I have, and it's pretty impressive. Much more up front, but worth it in the end.

u/badjoke33 · 2 pointsr/photography
u/astrotol · 2 pointsr/telescopes

I'm using Canon 1000D/XS and it cost around $100.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-XS-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-Black/dp/B001CBKJGG/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=canon+xs&qid=1572421306&sr=8-3

I'm very happy with it. I own Canon T3i as well but I'm not using it for astrophotography.

u/kerrz · 2 pointsr/photography

This is the same model camera. T1i = 500D. In the US it retails for $649 = £416. That's the base price in the US, not even a sale price.

Unfortunately, I can't tell you if it's a good deal. It's a lot more than I'd pay for that camera as a "sale" price, but I don't know what sort of prices you're looking at generally in the UK.

From doing a quick search of Amazon.co.uk... I can say that all of their cameras seem to be similarly over-priced. Perhaps Amazon.co.uk is just a bad place to buy camera gear. Hopefully a UK-based person pops in with some advice on a better place to buy your kit.

u/frostickle · 2 pointsr/photography

If you want to help out the photography subreddit, buy through amazon using these links:

Here is the Canon 5D Mark III Body + kit lens. $4,299.00

But a real killer wedding photography kit for someone with unlimited funds would be:

Canon 5D Mark III Body only. - $3,464.00

24-70mm f2.8 lens - $2,179.98

85mm f1.2 lens - $1,999.00

600EX Speedlite - $579.00 (Be sure to get a diffuser for it, and/or learn to bounce.)

Amazon gives us a % of the profit when people buy from these links, I plan to use the profits to fund prizes for photo competitions, and other projects to improve the /r/photography community.

I haven't been pushing the link very hard though, and so far we haven't actually gained much money at all lol.

Of course - if you can get a better deal from someone who isn't amazon, e.g. a local seller or adorama, keh, or if you want to buy used,
please buy from them.

You can re-sell the kit 24-105mm kit lens later if you wish. You probably wouldn't want to have the 24-105 AND the 24-70. The 24-70 covers the same sort of area, and is better in low light, and gives you better bokeh control. (That sharp-subject-with-a-soft-background look)

Some prefer the 70-200mm f2.8 over a 85mm prime lens... This might be easier to use, but if she learns to use the prime lens, her photos will be better.

Tip for buying canon cameras - buy a cheap broken one on ebay for less than $100, then ask canon to trade it in for credit towards a new Canon camera. It's their loyalty program or something. I'm not a canon shooter, so I'm unfamiliar with it.
***
Nikon is just as good as Canon. Pick whichever one your friends/family have, so you can share batteries, lenses, flash units etc. and they will be able to show you how to use the controls because they will be more familiar with their own system.

If you want the killer Nikon wedding kit, get a D4, 24-70 f2.8 and 85mm f1.4

Also, if anyone criticise you for buying thousands of dollars of gear for a beginner..... well, haters gonna hate. I'm sure a lot of people are jealous of your wife right now (myself included). But this is what happens when you pursue a career and earn money from something other than photography, and THEN get into photography.

It is much more comfortable to study something where you can get a job and earn money, then buy expensive cameras, than to study photography as an 18 year old in college, work part time, and spend 90% of your money buying a cheap camera!!!

u/henraldo · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

this camera for my wife. I hope I can get there by September. I am way the hell behind.

u/[deleted] · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

This camera

I want to take awesome pictures and start photography as a hobby.

I would be okay. It's not that high on my priority but it would be awesome to have :D

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

u/PandasRLove · 2 pointsr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

This
I have always wanted a nice quality camera. I really love photography and would really enjoy doing it as a hobby :D

But also, this I really really really really want it! <3 But I would NEVER spend that much money on something for myself.

u/provideocreator · 2 pointsr/videography

Yeah for example, my Canon camera shoots at 1/4000th of a second, so that's plenty fast, and I usually run out of light before I get it to that point.

The simplest thing I can see you doing is using the Camranger as you've already suggested, and just getting a cheap Rebel T4i for the camera since they're compatible. Doesn't need to be great for video anyways, but the Rebel cameras do actually take some nice stills for the price. You will need to protect it somehow, but that will be the case for most under $1000.

u/enaidyl · 2 pointsr/techtheatre

I have a Canon Eos-M which is Canon's mirrorless camera. It has similar specs to the Canon Rebel T3i (for about half the price), but it looks like it might have been discontinued, which sucks, cause I really like mine. Since it's mirrorless it uses it's own line of lenses, a 22mm and an 18mm-55mm zoom from Canon (Tamron has a telephoto lens for it, and there were some lenses released for it outside everywhere but the US), but it has an adaptor that allows it to use an of the lenses designed for the regular Eos line.

I think it's a pretty good camera for a student since you can get good quality pictures with out breaking the bank.

u/not_like_this_ · 2 pointsr/photography

Look for "Fulfilled By Amazon" Like this one

More info on FBA (they handle returns, so it should be easier)

I know this doesn't help now, just for future reference.

u/coffee_obsession · 2 pointsr/photography

Nikon D5200

Then stash the rest until you think you need a specific piece of gear or put some of it towards a photo class or two so you can understand how to use your camera if the free stuff online isn't helpful enough.

u/jaxsds · 2 pointsr/photography
u/sithnerfherder · 2 pointsr/photography

Personally I like Nikon. But this all matters who you talk to on whether they are Canon/Nikon/other brand. You can pick up some good started bundles relatively cheap and then add better lenses as you go. I like this as a good starter kit.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-NIKKOR/dp/B00AXTQR5U/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1419710663&sr=1-1&keywords=nikon+d5200

I suggest reading some reviews at http://www.dpreview.com they compare and contrast many different cameras and their features.

u/randomhornet · 2 pointsr/Nikon

I don't honestly think it's a spectacular deal. The D90 is a great camera but is long in the tooth now. Currently Amazon is selling the D5200 which has 24 mp, more autofocus points, swivel lcd screen (downsides are no internal focusing motor, 18-55 lens, refurbed ) for $480 all day long. This isn't even a spectacular price for the D5200 same bundle was $370 not too long ago.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00AXTQR5U/ref=olp_tab_refurbished?ie=UTF8&condition=refurbished

u/insomniac_koala · 2 pointsr/iWallpaper

Let me know if you like any of the images from my instagram. I'd be happy to provide full-res wallpapers from it. 🤙

*Edit: For those interested in my setup:
·Nikon D7100
·35mm f/1.8

I'd like to reiterate the fact that you definitely don't need the camera I used to take this. You can get a cheaper camera with similar result. It's all about what glass (lenses) you have.

u/raykoutj · 2 pointsr/Cameras

Refurbished D7100 costs around 600$ with taxes. Good camera all around.

u/zagaberoo · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

Less than $500 is tricky. I originally bought into the Pentax system because they're excellent value. I got my start on a K-50 which can be had new with a kit lens for $450 US. The K-50 has a ton of features no other beginner DSLR has, like weather sealing.

Looking at used is probably a good bet as well. A used large-sensor compact like the Sony RX100 or Panasonic LX100 would work well.

A used entry-level DSLR/MILC in any system (Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc.) would suit your introductory needs as well. There's something to be said for buying into the system you're going to go with in the long run, but honestly a lot of the APS-C lenses you'd get at the entry level wouldn't be great on the K-1/A7rII so it wouldn't hurt to buy into one system now and sell your gear when you're ready to buy into a 35mm system.

u/Veritech-1 · 2 pointsr/photography

Hey, I'm a Pentax user, so I can give you a little bit of insight here.

If I was you, I would

  1. buy a couple rolls of film to shoot on the K1000 and get a taste of film photography for a relatively low cost.

  2. purchase a cheap Pentax DSLR and use the lenses on it rather than (or as well as) the K1000.

    I am not sure what you already shoot on (point and shoot or a DSLR with some lenses), but you could consider buying a new Pentax camera. Pentax cameras are great in that they are backwards compatible with all K-Mount lenses. So, a new Pentax DSLR body will work with those lenses. I own a K-30 but its successor, the K-50, is very reasonably priced.

    The K-50 (body only) is available from Amazon for $280. And with the 18-55 lens kit, it is $370.

    This isn't a professional grade camera, but it is a great entry level DSLR, especially for the price. It comes with weather resistant seals in the camera body and the kit lenses. This protects your camera from some rain and dust. It also has a decent 16MP APS-C sensor. Pentax also announced a full frame camera, so if it is important to own a professional grade camera in the future, you will have the option.

    In total your lenses are probably worth a hundred to two hundred bucks, so I wouldn't sell them unless you are hurting for cash or have had your eye on something else.

    I hope this helps. I love Pentax, so if you have anymore questions, I'm happy to answer them.
u/wickeddimension · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

I'd buy this used D5300. It's a excellent starter camera with enough depth to be useful in a later stage. Definitely will be a while before you outgrow this.

With it, I'd recommend the 18-55mm Kit lens and a 55-200mm Zoom

Both are autofocus, they will give you a range of 18-200mm in 2 stages.They are pretty good lenses, solid build, autofocus and image stabilisation. It's under a 1000$ but will cover everything. Add in a SD card or 2. Extra battery for it. And perhaps a camera bag and tripod if you want and you'll be good to go.

Using these 2 lenses you can use a tool like Lightroom to figure out after a year or so what focal range most your pictures are in (Your camera embeds all this data in the photo's ) and then you can look at buying better quality lenses for those focal ranges. Buying a wide range of zooms will allow you to experiment. From wide angel to telephoto to portraits and really figure out what you like.

Sure a 85mm prime will do better at portraits than these lenses, but are you into portraits, you won't know till you own this for a while.

I think it's a excellent starting kit, there is a elaborate video here covering absolute everything this camera has to offer and it will be excellent into learning.

As for used, I woulnd't worry about that. In my experience it's almost never worth it to buy a new camera. Especially since its often more limited in functions or costs a lot more. Somebody took a few pictures with it and had it's in his bag, so it's not 'new' big deal. That said some people have something against buying new. If you're that kind of person I'd still recommend the same kit. But then buying it off amazonor such. The D5300 with the 18-55 is about 573$ on there atm. And with the 55-200 included it's still under a 1000$.

As for the models you recommended, I'd largley ignore anything mirrorless as the lens selection just isn't as diverse and affordable as a DSLR. The T6 is a excellent camera and also a great option with a similar selection of lenses as I listed above. Although I don't exactly know if Canon offers these zoom, they definitely have a 18-55 as a kit lens. Not sure if they have a affordable zoom like that though. The A7 is a horrible choice as lenses for it are imnmensely expensive.

The Canon 80D is also a great camera but I'd say if you're new to photography it's just excessively expensive. Better to learn with a cheaper camera and then buy something else if you know what you are looking for in a camera.

Edit:

As /u/logarithmic_bushel suggested, the D5500 has a touch screen which can aid a lot in usability.

u/playful1510 · 2 pointsr/williamosman

According to his website, John uses a Canon EOS 7D Mark II Digital SLR

u/thenasch · 2 pointsr/pics

Yeah the single digit ones are the pro line and are quite a bit of coin. The 7D Mark II is about $1500.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=dp_ob_title_ce

u/noritheelephant · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

I always worry when recommending equipment because there are so many options and honestly recommending the right one based on your needs is difficult. That being said there are several great deals on the camera market right now.

Canon is offering the
T5 with two lenses for 599.99

(http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00V73JZY6/ref=mp_s_a_1_sc_3?qid=1458226791&sr=8-3-spell&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=t5+canera)

If you're a Nikon guy, Nikon is offering there fun little D3300 with two lenses for about the same price range. I personally recommend this because I think this is the better option in terms of specs.

(http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00T8LQ8VW/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1458227047&sr=8-2&pi=SX200_QL40&keywords=nikon+d3300&dpPl=1&dpID=41G8D-4CF3L&ref=plSrch)

And just as an outsider here is a body that I own and absolutely love that is great for filming and time lapse.

(http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NEWZDRG/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1458227297&sr=8-1&pi=SX200_QL40&keywords=7d+mark+ii&dpPl=1&dpID=41Wd4GbZ-HL&ref=plSrch)

Also a time lapse controller will be needed so here is one I recommend

(http://www.mindarin.com)

u/master0li · 2 pointsr/Beginning_Photography

Is your moon criteria because you want to be able to zoom really far or that you feel only decent cameras can do that? I ask because if you don't need a long reach you could put more money toward a better camera/lens that's shorter.

If you don't need long reach and want a small camera a used RX100 will give you great quality for stills and video for under $400. You mention travel so I think for walking around it's great. It's a fixed lens though so you can't get more out of it down the line.

If you're thinking of it more like an investment and you'll grow into it over time you'll probably want to go with an ILC (interchangeable lens camera). Mirrorless will be smaller DSLR will be bigger. Just know that you're buying into a whole ecosystem because because lenses aren't swapable between brands. There are adapters but generally you lose things like auto focus unless you pay big bucks for an adapter.

For DSLR a used Nikon D3300 or Canon T6 is under $400. For mirrorless a used Sony a5000. There's also the micro 4/3's mirrorless systems but someone else would have to chime in for recommendations as I have no experience w/ them.

I should note that all my specific recommendations don't have a ton of reach (can't get far subjects). But what you save on that gets you incredible quality if you take the time to learn. Also w/ the ILC cameras you could get a telephoto lens in the future. You could get a cheaper body and get a kit that has 2 lenses one of which is a telephoto - used Nikon D3100 Kit or used Canon T5 kit for right at $400. You have to swap lens to go long. If you really want that zoom for cheaper or smaller overall size probably look at choices in this article.

That said if you're going to stay on auto mode all the time my recommendations are probably not worth the price premium since you won't get the most out of it. Save some bucks and get a point and shoot that's easier to travel with and you're more likely to take out and use. I will say the quality gap between camera phones and point and shoots is pretty minimal these days. You probably need to spend $300-$400 for the significant jump in quality.

u/theSweetLou · 2 pointsr/DSLR

You just missed a Canon t5 deal on Amazon for Black Friday, but you can still grab one for $449 which isn't terrible. (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-75-300mm/dp/B00V73JZY6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1449091128&sr=8-1&keywords=cannon+t5+dslr)

But, I'd like to note that the older t2i/t3i are much more favorable. A lot of people I know have complaints about the t5 models. Differences can be adequately reviewed here: http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-Rebel-T5-vs-Canon-T3i/detailed

If you're really looking for options, check out snapsort.com in general- they have a slider, so you can put in your budget and find the right camera for you.

u/Nennycow · 2 pointsr/Corridor

They use the Canon 80D. Here's a good comparison.

u/perpterds · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

So, I didn't see the post I originally found, so you might need to do some google research. I can't speak to the quality of anything honestly, as I've no experience with them, myself.


Anyhow, I did also find the Amazon listings:


Body only, no lens, $999.00 US
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Megapixel-Sensor/dp/B01BUYK04A/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1550152289&sr=1-3&keywords=canon%2B80d&th=1


Body + Kit lens 18mm-135mm (it's a pretty solid zoom), $1399.00 US
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-Megapixel-Sensor/dp/B01BUYJX6G/ref=sr_1_3?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1550152289&sr=1-3&keywords=canon%2B80d&th=1


Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM lens
This is possibly *the* best lens you can get below $400-$500, especially in terms of sharpness. It's what I used for that photo linked above, and it's nearly the only lens I use (despite having about 4 other lenses). And it's only $125. I recommend this even higher than the 80D itself, if you get *any* Canon.

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-STM-Lens/dp/B00X8MRBCW/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1550152582&sr=1-3&keywords=canon+ef+50mm+f%2F1.8+stm+lens

u/Bossman1086 · 2 pointsr/canon

I just bought an 80D yesterday. I upgraded from a Rebel T3i that I've been using for the last couple years.

For what it's worth, Amazon has it on sale for $100 off right now and you might want to take a look here, too (keep in mind these are both body only).

That said, the 6D is still a great camera - especially for landscape shots where you don't need a more robust AF system like in the 80D. Before I pulled the trigger on the 80D, I was also considering the 6D and almost went with that instead.

u/acm · 2 pointsr/Denver

Thanks for the follow!

This was shot with a Canon 70D with a Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM Lens.

That said, I have some additional thoughts on gear. You truly can't go wrong with any Canon, Nikon, or Sony kit these days. My camera is 5 years old, and I've been looking to upgrade for a while now. The successor is the 80D for $1k. It's a great mid-level crop sensor DSLR that has some sensor improvements over the 70D. The 90D is supposedly coming later this year too.

If I wasn't already invested in Canon lenses though, I'd take a hard look at Sony. The a7iii just came out and has some really impressive specs at a decent price. It's $2k for just the body, which is a bit over your budget. Sony also tends to charge less for the body and more for the lenses than Canon, so in some price comparisons they can seem cheaper. a6500 is within your budget, with room to buy a lens or two. I'd recommend going to a camera shop or somewhere where you can get your hands on the gear and see what you like and dont like. A couple times a year Mike's Cameras brings a ton of gear to the Denver Zoo and lets people try it all out. That'd be a good event to check out.

Hope that helps!

u/BlacklistedUser · 2 pointsr/photography

Amazon(+ grip)has them for cheaper, but if you know this one is of superior quality and has been taken care it may be worth it. Seems a slightly overpriced for a camera made in 2008, unless they throw in a lens. (and TBH the 4gb card is not worth much and sync cables, charger, battery are standard).

Unless you need the weather sealing of the 50D (i.e. heavy rain/snow/sand) you can go with something like a NEW T6 and get a lens or a NEW Nikon D3400 with lens

edit: I also want to point out while the stock lenses are good for most environments you might also want to save/get some additional lenses (used lenses are a great option).

u/King_Brutus · 2 pointsr/AskPhotography

No problem! I understand you have a tight budget, but I shoot with a Rebel T6 and got it for $300 with a basic lens and it gets the job done. If you're taking pictures you like with an iphone then keep with that but DSLRs are a lot more affordable nowadays and there are some good deals on starter bundles at places like Target and Best Buy (especially on Black Friday).

A camera body will allow you a lot more flexibility with your photos as well since you can adjust every setting.

Overall I like your pictures and they can only get better, keep it up!

u/johnthefig · 1 pointr/photography

Oh wow nice. I didn't even know about this. Would this he good right here? https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Zoom-Nikkor/dp/B000KJQ1DG thanks for showing me this camera

u/greenrobot · 1 pointr/ReviewThis

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Zoom-Nikkor/dp/B000KJQ1DG/ref=as_li_wdgt_fl_ex?&camp=212361&creative=383957&linkCode=waf&tag=ove03-20
I personally do not own this camera, but my sister did. I used it every now and then and I found it very easy to use. It's a really good starting DSLR but not to great on features. It best feature is that it is a Nikon so you can basically use any Nikon lens in existence.

u/gibson_ · 1 pointr/pics
u/pesante0013 · 1 pointr/photography

Oh, /r/photography, you are my savior! I need help deciding on a camera purchase, and I believe you are the experts to ask. I am looking for a camera to use for wildlife photography and am going back and forth between two options: the nikon p510 or the nikon d40 (I'm open to other options within the same price range if you have any suggestions). I found a refurbished p510 online for $230 but my friend's mom is selling her d40 for $150 (it's the basic setup so there's no vast assortment of lenses or accessories with it). I know this is like comparing apples to oranges; they're both fruits but one takes better pictures. I've pondered over this but I figured I should ask the experts. Help me, /r/photography, you're my only hope!

u/ChineseLabia · 1 pointr/Portland

Watch some YouTube videos or read articles on composition. It makes a huge difference.

Phones are pretty limited for anything besides well lit, relatively close up shots. You might consider buying and older model DSLR like a D40

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/ol/B000KJQ1DG/ref=mw_dp_primenote_olp?ie=UTF8&condition=all

With an SLR you get optical zoom, bigger sensor, choice of aperture, etc. Lots more control. Learn some basic touch up techniques and you could make some really sharp photos.

u/darkblade420 · 1 pointr/Cameras
u/Sparkablemike · 1 pointr/videography

Currently I have something like this and a bag. Model is too old to shoot video and having issues.

Canon Rebel XSi DSLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (OLD MODEL) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0012YA85A/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_sVGQAbBN1XAK8

Also have a basic tripod

u/smsf65536 · 1 pointr/pics

Thanks! I have a Canon Rebel XSi and really like it (obviously blows any camera phone I've had away). It really is awesome the kind of stuff you can do nowadays with photography.. Most of the time I really just try and strive to model in a photo what can really be seen to the human eye but it's next to impossible. You just really have to be there..

u/ContentWithOurDecay · 1 pointr/Bacon

This one? I've been wanting to get a digital SLR for awhile now.

u/FancyKetchupIsnt · 1 pointr/aww

Where in the HELL did you get a 700 dollar figure from?! I spent 450 on my camera and pirated a copy of photoshop.

FOR INSTANCE: This DSLR is only 500 BRAND FUCKING NEW on Amazon, and that's with ten seconds of searching, and not even checking local craigslist posting or ebay auctions. Hell, Amazon even has it listed for 300 used.

And while the camera isn't strictly necessary, don't even fucking pretend that the value in having it isn't apparent, since the only reason we're bickering here is because of the PHOTOS OF SHELTER ANIMALS THAT INCREASED ADOPTION RATES. I would think that a moderate expenditure on a camera to greatly increase adoption rates is a pretty damned good investment.

As far as changing my argument, it's been the same the entire time, and that argument is that it's not that fucking expensive. The example I used of taking months to purchase a camera was a pretty extreme example of what one (1) broke college student can do with even a tiny amount of budgeting skill. I would assume that a group of adults in charge of taking care of and adopting out at-risk animals would have their shit together enough to budget for a fucking camera.

Hell, even if they did decide to save for 3 months to get the camera + software legally, assuming it costs 600 dollars total, it would take 200 dollars a month extra to get the camera. Assuming 3 thirty-day months, that's a whopping SIX DOLLARS AND SIXTY SIX(ish) CENTS A DAY. I've seen donation jars at shitty gas stations pull in more than that. All they'd have to do is put a jar at the front counter and a sign next to it explaining that they're raising money for a camera to get more animals into good homes. They'd probably have the money before the 3 months was up from that alone, not to mention the fact that almost no organization that stays afloat for any period of time runs such a shitty budget that the odd 500 dollar expenditure from time to time is gonna put them under. I've worked at animal shelters before, they're better run than that.

So where, in this wall of text, am I being dense? And where are you getting "highly expensive" from a $500 (MAXIMUM) purchase?

u/BarunTuk · 1 pointr/Aquariums

No, just my Canon Rebel Xsi.

u/eclectro · 1 pointr/electronics

This is not like the old days when 3 MP digital cameras were all anybody could get and it was a real hit and miss as to what you would get. Now most all of the cameras are so good that there is not much difference in the quality. The digital SLR types will be better because you can use different lenses. But I seriously ask yourself what you want to use your camera for and get a < $100 USD camera off of woot.com. You will fill a lot less bad breaking it than a $600 SLR digital. But if you must (i.g. professional work) it's hard to go wrong with a Canon. And you would have some money to buy extra lenses.

Of course, you can read reviews here and here. Some guy blew up some 5 Meg photos and some 10 Meg photos a couple of years back and stuck them on a subway and nobody could tell the difference (maybe somebody has a link for that). Here is a similar discussion. The fact is it's hard to go wrong with many of the cameras today. If it was me I'd look at warranty coverage and service and pick which one had the best. It's amazing the cameras we have today. So in the end, it kind of depends on the work you are doing. BTW, this is just my opinion, I'm not stating it as fact.

u/ReigningCatsNotDogs · 1 pointr/photography

Hey man, is this camera any good? It looks like it matches up pretty well with the other ones you said (in terms of lens and stuff like that) but I am a noob when it comes to this. It is the Canon XS and it is the daily deal on Woot.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-XS-Digital-18-55mm-Black/dp/B001CBKJGG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323803102&sr=8-1

u/RickSanchez_ · 1 pointr/photography

I'm wondering if I should get a new camera. I bought a Canon Rebel XS ( http://www.amazon.com/Canon-XS-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-Black/dp/B001CBKJGG ) many, many years ago and still only have the same lens. The camera still works fine, as far as I'm aware.

I've been thinking about getting into photography again and was wondering if it would be beneficial to get a kit from Amazon (something like this: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-18-55mm-75-300mm-Accessory/dp/B00J34YO92/ref=lp_2476680011_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1464897016&sr=1-1 ) OR should I just get a few new lens and keep using my current camera?

Thanks!

u/jammesonbaxter · 1 pointr/Albuquerque

A 10 year old Canon Rebel XS with the kit lense nothing fancy.

u/ferlessleedr · 1 pointr/Futurology

| Item | Price
---|---|----
Camera | Canon Rebel XS DSLR | $243.49 used
Lens | Opteka 500-1000mm f/8 High Definition Telephoto Mirror Lens | $114.95 new
Result | Contributing to astronomy by finding a new fucking planet | Priceless

Same camera as he used according to here but a different lens. However this lens should actually be a more powerful magnification than the one he used. I think. If there are people who know cameras out there better than me and I'm wrong please correct me.

Regarding the laptop, I don't know how processor-heavy the number-crunching portion of this is, but you could probably do this on whatever home PC you have already. The arduinos and other controllers will be relatively cheap. Altogether I'd say this project is easily less than $1000.

u/zainut85 · 1 pointr/photography

In your opinion, what would the best lens be to capture pictures like this. I have a very basic DSLR (canon Rebel XS). http://www.amazon.com/Canon-XS-Digital-18-55mm-Black/dp/B001CBKJGG

u/funran · 1 pointr/todayilearned

Hey, I've got a Cannon Rebel XS (here http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001CBKJGG). I live in Oklahoma, have a tripod. Can I take a picture like this with my camera? Do I need a special lens? Any advice would be so awesome, thanks!

Oh, I also have this lens, but it's more for portraits. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00007E7JU

u/opie2 · 1 pointr/photography

If you're willing to spend about $600, this is a damned good deal.....

u/acts541 · 1 pointr/photography

I'd go ahead and get the 600D. If you wanted to save some money, I've got the 500D which works just fine for a starter, then you could probably grab the 50mm 1.8 which once you outgrow the kit lens, is generally the next step.

u/kaymar · 1 pointr/Cameras

Any preferences, like Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc...? I'm a Canon person and I recommend their Rebel lines, especially t1i to begin. It's so cheap now but it's a solid entry level DSLR. I think you should start with the kit lens, regular 18-55mm, and play with it for while until you know which lens to buy next. I found an used only for $299 with the lens from Amazon seller: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T1i-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B001XURPQS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377301675&sr=8-1&keywords=t1i

u/solaris79 · 1 pointr/photography

Here's the kit I was looking at:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001XURPQS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Comes with a EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens. Read a review of it online that stated: “If you need a general purpose lens, and the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens reaches the limits of your budget, it is a good choice. I think this lens is going to help sell more Canon Digital SLR cameras. It is certainly a great upgrade over the 18-55 II for the money. It is a nice addition to Canon's lineup.”

I'll check out those modes.

I posted an article a few days ago that actually talked about how important that back button focus is for shooting moving things/sports. I didn't understand the concept at first, but after doing some research into it, it sounds like it's actually really useful. Prevents you from having to hold the action button halfway down while waiting to take a shot in order to keep the autofocus going (or something like that).

u/Rishiku · 1 pointr/itookapicture

Would you disagree with these reviews?

DWTC(Didnt want to click): Pictures come out fuzzy?

u/ItsACharlieDay · 1 pointr/Random_Acts_Of_Amazon

Can't tell if you mean product we'd love to get and have also used and need or a reasonably priced product that we want

u/rrpjdisc · 1 pointr/astrophotography

I'd like to eventually get into astrophotography like this, but I'm always confused by the "equipment lists" like you've just posted.

So what you're saying is, if I buy these 3 things off Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGZ1V0?th=1

https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-EdgeHD-CGEM-Schmidt-Cassegrain-Telescope/dp/B002HGU474

https://www.amazon.com/Televue-Barlow-1-25-inch-1-1/dp/B0001GJCIE

I'd be able to do what you did? (And I'm saying this assuming I already have AutoStakkert, RegiStax, and Photoshop)
That's it, no additional equipment whatsoever?

u/WaAhLcK · 1 pointr/videography

Okay after visiting your Amazon links (and busting up some drywall with my head), I remembered that my university offers production equipment for rental and checkout. I want to give these a go when I raise the money for my own equipment. This will also give me a chance to screen the episode(s) with people to see if they think it's funny, if it is something I'll be able to keep up with at school, et cetera.


The Library offers an Olympus E-620 Digital SLR Camera, Canon EOS Rebel T4i--which I think may be nicer than the camcorders they offer, possibly--and in camcorders they offer the Panasonic HC-V700 Full HD Camcorder, and the Sony HDR-CX350V Handycam.

The editing equipment is on-par I think, they have tons of programs, found here.

Green screen, tripods, XLR cable, and even lav mics are available for rent.

However the greatest resource will be their media production studio which sounds pretty damn great. Also, there is a digital media production studio, whatever the difference is. If you click on any links, click on these because I think it'll be most useful.

u/CricketPinata · 1 pointr/Filmmakers

Here are some cameras i'm used or that i've worked with footage from that are in the "affordable" range I think. This is a decent cross-section I think of a lot of the DSLR and Camcorders out there.

It really depends on if you just want a really basic camcorder to just use as a learning platform (I would consider a used DVX or something if that's the case), or if it's something you want to try to use as a professional rig, and if so what do you want to do with it? Narrative work, documentaries, videography work?

Depending on what you're planning some cameras on this list will be good choices, some will be bad.

If you don't mind spending more, maybe think about the Panasonic AF100, or consider looking into the Black Magic: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/855879-REG/Blackmagic_Design_BMD_CINECAM26KEF_Cinema_Camera.html

Or maybe even a used Scarlet or something.

Sub-$1000 Range:

CANON:

T4i/650D, $600-800 depending on kit and reseller.


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/44077443

https://vimeo.com/44366121

https://vimeo.com/49516874


60D, $600-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/32416450

https://vimeo.com/38775602

https://vimeo.com/15181980

https://vimeo.com/37153340


Canon HF-G10 $900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/22978435 - Various cameras are used in this one, but gives you a general idea to the quality of Canon Camcorders

https://vimeo.com/21301495

https://vimeo.com/6519838





NIKON:

Nikon D5200 $800


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/54991854

https://vimeo.com/60135187

https://vimeo.com/57861628

https://vimeo.com/59832019



D7000, $700-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/25585194

https://vimeo.com/15894774

https://vimeo.com/31984384

https://vimeo.com/17696909



PANASONIC:

Panasonic GH2, $565-950


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/28454865

https://vimeo.com/57878898

https://vimeo.com/22605282

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U9KmAlrEXU - Trailer for a feature-length film shot with it.

https://vimeo.com/33047750



SONY:

Sony NEX6 $800-900


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/52942499

https://vimeo.com/55598921

https://vimeo.com/56972084



$1000-1800 Range:

CANON:

7D $900-1200


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/25968181

https://vimeo.com/16117083

https://vimeo.com/7764570

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_jWPJwKIE - Trailer for feature-length film shot with it.


5D MK.II, $1400-1800+


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16339841

https://vimeo.com/33342571

https://vimeo.com/4704533

Some 5D/7D comparisons: https://vimeo.com/14832168



NIKON:

D7100


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/62624613

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgVhkZdyP1c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb1FbZcIfvw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR1oZsqhrX0


PANASONIC:

Panasonic GH3 $1200-1500


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/49420579

https://vimeo.com/49944730

https://vimeo.com/54266780

https://vimeo.com/58762647

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fhEazbFKI


SONY:

Sony NEX7 $1140


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/33599712

https://vimeo.com/36845339

https://vimeo.com/36117747

https://vimeo.com/35176255



$1900-2500 Range:

CANON:

XF100, $2500


-Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16963810

https://vimeo.com/21187597

https://vimeo.com/27391327


5D MK.III $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/56203946

https://vimeo.com/47767166

https://vimeo.com/41657820

https://vimeo.com/37838697



NIKON:
D600 $2000-2500


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/58319404

https://vimeo.com/52952766

https://vimeo.com/49989606

https://vimeo.com/52634062


D800 $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/36305675

https://vimeo.com/56135940

https://vimeo.com/38912704

https://vimeo.com/42065372



PANASONIC:
HMC-150, $2100-2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/9783117

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIRUUnmnMFk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF29YfIKErc


AF100/105
$2500-3000


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/16724324

https://vimeo.com/15765280

https://vimeo.com/16000333

https://vimeo.com/30063219


SONY:
VG20 $2200


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/32747038

https://vimeo.com/31024014

https://vimeo.com/37048917



A99, $2500+


Sample Videos:

https://vimeo.com/52031763

https://vimeo.com/58012010

https://vimeo.com/50982162

u/dontdrinkandderive · 1 pointr/photography

I am a beginner photographer and i made my decision on my starter camera (Canon t4i). Here is the link to the deal:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00894YWD0/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&condition=used[1]




I plan on buying from the seller GREAT BUYS HERE for $425.00. LIKE NEW condition and comes with the stock 18-55mm EF-S IS II Lens. the deal seems really good after thorough research. HOWEVER the only thing holding me back form placing my order is the fact that i have never purchased a (slightly) used electronic on Amazon from a used seller, and that this Canon camera is not through Canon's partnership with Amazon; instead it is from a seller called GREAT BUYS HERE, which has FABULOUS reviews by the way. I just want to know how their returns work if i did not like the camera for some strange reason. will they accept my return if i did not like the camera after the first day? And the return still through Amazon in a way? like will i need GREAT BUYS HERE's approval to return the product?

u/whoadangjamie · 1 pointr/BeautyAddiction

My fiance is kind of a camera-nut, and didn't want me using his super fancy camera, so I've been using his "This should be good enough for your blog, Jamie" camera: Canon's EOS-M. I think he might have changed the lens to a macro one, but I'm not sure.

u/Iggy95 · 1 pointr/Cameras

For APS-C size camera's: Well you have the Fujifilm line up of cameras X100 X100S X-E1 X-M1 though those are mostly all upwards of 1000$ (though the x100 you could find used for a little cheaper and the X-M1 is more like 700-800). There's the Sony NEX cameras which you can find in price from 400$ for older models all the way up to 1000$ NEX7 but the most recommended one has been the NEX 6 (EVF and a standard hotshoe). There's also the Ricoh GR which isn't interchangeable with other lenses (and doesn't zoom) but is an APS-C size sensor camera that's actually pocketable. Oh and there's also the firesale EOS-M that's going for 350$ with a lens right now. But there might be a new one coming out soon.

If you're not looking for a DSLR size sensor (or price) then you may want to look around at Micro 4/3 cameras.

And finally if you don't want to worry about interchangeable lenses then you could look around at larger sensor point and shoots. Example: Sony RX100. It's right around your price range and comes with a larger than usual 1inch sensor (as opposed to the 1/1.63-inch sensor on your XZ-1). Though there's an RX100 II out as well, has some fixes to the gripes people had about the RX100.

u/Bester2001 · 1 pointr/Cameras

Its not cheap but the sweet spot for DSLRs is CANONS new 7D MK 2 it has a crazy fast buffer that allows practically unlimited jpegs to be shot continuosly at 10frame per second, and has one of the best auto focus systems of any camera below or even in higher price points. It also is the best for shooting HD Sports video thanks to the auto focus system. Canon 7D Mark II Real World Review: http://youtu.be/UX6gK0bkq3g. <br> http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG#mobile-twister_style_name_1421539408074

<br>
If your on a budget either get the Canon S110 $180 on amazon and is the best for the price (launched at 450$ and is as good as the newer S120 that sells for 379. A middle ground would be the Nikon D5300 and also as someone else recommended tbr GOPRO
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00AXTQR5U/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1421539656&sr=8-2&pi=AC_SX200_QL40

u/oujiff · 1 pointr/photography

I'd start her out with this camera. I've got the model prior the 5100 and love it. This starter kit gives you the body and good lens, you'll need to get a card and carrying case. Later down the road after i'd suggest picking up a telephoto lens too like the nikon 55-200 f 4/5.6.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-NIKKOR/dp/B00AXTQR5U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1376228711&sr=8-1&keywords=d5200

u/flamyngo · 1 pointr/photography

I didn't even know you could adjust the white balance. I've just been setting it on "easy auto mode" or "macro mode" and hoping for the best.

I don't think I would need to get any closer, but YES-- that's exactly what I am wanting-- smaller area of focus, more blurred background. I tried FOREVER to get this picture: http://imgur.com/10ANPpO to look like that. (I took that indoors, at night, on my fireplace with the ceiling fan light on. Please don't make fun of me)

So the entry level dslr's like this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AXTQR5U/ref=s9_simh_gw_p421_d0_i2?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=1W80TJAS0QQ035NVT101&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1688200382&pf_rd_i=507846
will help me to get my photography to the level I am wanting? I am not going to get where I want to get with my coolpix, right? I've basically taken that one as far as it's going to go?

u/Metryx · 1 pointr/mexico

Eso cuesta el modelo 3d , esa cuesta esto

u/AlternateContent · 1 pointr/photography

This D7100?, no problem with refurbished, but if it is worth it, like 300$ worth it, to go with a new 7200, would you recommend it? I could swing the 1200

u/EngineeringIsHard · 1 pointr/photography

I was trying to keep the whole setup to $1000. I was looking at a refurb d7100 from Adorama.

The other route was the kit from Amazon.

u/YuB_ · 1 pointr/letsplay

The external mic input is gonna be hard to find on a camera in that price range...let me think here...

The Canon Rebel SL1 is the only cam I can think of that will give you the features you want at that price point, but I'm sure there are others. https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-18-55mm-Lens/dp/B00BW6LY2Y

Things to keep in mind - DSLR's have a steep learning curve, the limited autofocus could make this a difficult camera to use for "walking around" style vlogs, and you're still gonna have to buy whatever external mic you want.

u/fiskiligr · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

> here's a hibiscus flower at roughy 1:1.

WHOA!

That's amazing ...

I have a few other examples of the kinds of pictures I have taken:

u/dvidsilva · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

I'm really happy with my SL1, I heard is the best one on that price range

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-18-55mm-Lens/dp/B00BW6LY2Y

If you prefer mirrorless, get Sony.

u/UltimateGrammarNinja · 1 pointr/CautiousBB

I got my husband a Canon Rebel SL-1 for Father's Day last year. We love it. It's good quality, but it was a lot less expensive than some of the other DSLRs out there. It functions just fine- we aren't professionals.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BW6LY2Y/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1

u/TNoD · 1 pointr/photography

So I want to get into photography. I've looked around, did research and made up my mind on getting the pentax k-50 which is right along what I want to spend.

http://www.amazon.ca/Pentax-K-50-DA-18-55mm-Kit/dp/B00DBPKAAG/

My question(s) is, do I need to buy anything else? Amazon states that it comes with a battery? I assume the charger comes with it? Do I need to buy a shoulder strap?

Is there anything else I might be overlooking as a first time buyer? Anything I should be weary of? Should I buy a bag for travel/protection? If so which one?

u/DarkestSage · 1 pointr/pentax

Is it still worth the price it's selling for on amazon? It's around $450 w/the 18-55mm lens.

u/Praelium · 1 pointr/photography

I took a class recently and used the Canon T5i Rebel, which I really enjoyed. But now that I'm buying my own camera I'm struggling to find the right skill vs price balance.

Is a $600 camera too much for a beginner who just wants to photograph landscapes, night scenes, and everyday objects? In class we used manual mode exclusively -- something with a lot of versatility in that aspect would be great. I also want the basic features so I can learn and explore this hobby without accidentally paying extra for luxuries only a highly experienced photography could use. But I also don't want to be kicking myself 1 year from now for buying such a limiting camera, you know?

I visited a local store and the owner recommended the Nikon D5300.

Nikon D5300 - $500

Nikon D3300 - $450

Nikon D3000 - $150

\^\^\^ I found those other two by reading through this thread.

On top of this I'll need a lens, tripod, case, and SD card. But the issue isn't really price but rather overestimating the quality of camera I realistically need.

If anyone can offer some guidance I'd really appreciate it, because this is stressing me out. Thank you.

u/justfred · 1 pointr/Cameras

I've got one, and it's great. Essentially it's their entry level camera , but with a folding viewscreen on the back and a few more features.

That price seems a little high. It's $500 new, $475 refurb.

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-Focus-S/dp/B00I1CPA0O

If it's good-as-new, with boxes and everything, and has a low shutter count, it's probably good, but I'd still angle for a lower price. If it's missing boxes, or more than a year or two old, it should be lower.

u/nicking44 · 1 pointr/Nikon

Would it be a good idea to go with this bundle

Or just buy the parts I need camera, case, tripod, SD?

All links go to amazon.com

I don't really care about the filters in the bundle since they are probably trash anyways, and I might have better ones lying around my house anyways that I can use if I want to try them out. But I'm not sure about the other lenses, and items. But I figured if i get the bundle I can try different attachments out and see how I like them. but if to many of the items are going to be trash I would prefer to spend the extra money and buy what I need/want so I don't waist more money

I'M open to alternatives, it seems like from my research this would be a good camera to go with, but if you have any alternatives (try to limit to ~$700 with everything (SD, Camera. case, tripod, etc)

u/mike275ms · 1 pointr/photography

Is there a large difference between: "Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body Only (discontinued by manufacturer)" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-discontinued-manufacturer/dp/B002NEGTTW and the newer "Canon EOS 7D Mark II Digital SLR Camera" http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1458083051&sr=8-2&keywords=cannon+eos+7d+mark+ii

Looking to pick up one of the above models as a birthday gift for my girlfriend. She would be using it for low light concert photography as well as shooting video for basic Vlogs. As there is a considerable price difference, was just curious on the real differences and if anyone had suggestions on the better choice.

u/xtremedeo · 1 pointr/videography

did you check out the [Canon EOS 7D Mark II] (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=dimz04-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkId=1f68aa8aa5e8e3cb1c6d30addd1387bb) Ranked as one of the best canon cameras. It comes with:
20.2 MP CMOS sensor and ISO 100-16000
High speed continuous shooting up to 10.0 fps
65-point all cross-type AF system
Stunning Full HD video with Custom Movie Servo AF (speed and sensitivity)
Dual Pixel CMOS AF enables you to shoot video like a camcorder

u/baaalk · 1 pointr/photography

Which of these would you recommend?

Option 1

Option 2

I am not looking to do any specific type of photography at the moment. However, down the road I may get into some very basic macro. /shrug

I'm sorry I can't really give any more information, for I am just about as new to this as you can be.

u/echis · 1 pointr/photography

In August, my wife and I will be going to New Mexico to visit some family. We're planning to do a day hike up a mountain and I was hoping to take my camera (Cannon T5 bundle), but I'm not sure what kind of gear would be nessisary/needed for a hike that wouldn't be too strenuous to take along. I am very new to photography and have a somewhat limited budget so I don't need anything too fancy, just anything that will make the hike easier, or help me get better photos.

u/terkistan · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

amazon US sells that bundle for US$427, and it was $399 last Black Friday. New, with full warranty.

The newer T6 2-lens bundle sells new, with full warranty, for $449.

So, aside from the question of checking out gear, make sure this deal is really a deal.

u/LocationBot · 1 pointr/legaladvice

---

>
> http://imgur.com/a/myIAb
>

---


I am a bot whose sole purpose is to improve the timeliness and accuracy of responses in this subreddit.


---

It appears you forgot to include your location in the title or body of your post.


Please update the original post to include this information.


Do NOT delete this post - Instead, simply edit the post with the requested information..


---

Report Inaccuracies Here | [GitHub] (https://github.com/ianpugh/LocationBot2.0) | Author | LocationBot Statistics (Not Mobile Friendly) | LocationBot v2.1.1


---

Original Post:

Author: /u/J_Yoonits

My housemate bought a camera but received a different one
>Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but I'm not sure where else to post it. My housemate recently bought a camera from somebody off of our college's craigslist page.
>
> http://imgur.com/a/zP7OS
>
> The title says that it is a "Canon Rebel T5 Camera" but it is not, it is actually a Canan Rebel XS.
>
> The Rebel T5 looks like this: https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-75-300mm/dp/B00V73JZY6
>
> and if you look at the camera from the facebook post, the logo is in the bottom right and says XS. He didn't realize until a few hours later that he'd been sold a different camera. When he tried to contact the seller she first said that she had sold him the correct camera, and later proceeded to block him on facebook. Is there anything my housemate can do to try and get his money back, or is he out of luck?
>

u/horribleweather · 1 pointr/photography

I started with a Canon and an 18-55mm lens along the lines of this. Very user friendly and great quality pictures. Refurbished models in general are a great deal- what's more important is that you look into investing in lenses that you can use in the future.

u/anthemredit · 1 pointr/photography

So ive always wanted to get into photography since i was like, 9. 7 years, 2 jobs later, and ive decided its time to purchase my first "camera."

My budget is 600$(maybe 10-50$+) ive looked at two cameras so far but i dont know which is better, what to look for, ect. If someone could help me and give me a few more cameras to choose from(with some explanation) it would be very appreciated!

cameras i was looking at:
https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-Digital-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B00IB1BTWI/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_pdt_img_sims?ie=UTF8

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01CO2JPYS/ref=s9_acsd_bw_wf_a_samsungu_mdi?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-6&pf_rd_r=00Z9QT022HA512HQ191F&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=8afab454-36e6-4b02-aaa4-2e52dcb0c416&pf_rd_i=14725218011

u/OhOhOhMyGosh · 1 pointr/OkCupid

My birthday is not too far off. If I can lose 30 pounds by the actual day I'll be so proud of myself. So far it's only been five pounds that I may or may not have gained back over the past weekend. So far I'm starting to watch my carb and sugar intake. I was trying on my summer dresses from years past and noticed that one fits a little loose than it has previously.

As for work, still working on gaining more responsibility. Weird to say that it's almost been a year since starting. Time has certainly flown.

As soon as I obtain the money I'll work on getting the camera. I've narrowed it down to a Canon or a Nikon. Kind of leaning towards the Canon. I liked the weight of it, but the Nikon has ultra-clear images.

u/SPYALEX8 · 1 pointr/ExposurePorn

If you're looking to buy new, you can take long exposure photos with any entry level DSLR. The Nikon D3400 or Canon EOS Rebel T6 are both great starting points (I pesonally like the Nikon a bit more). They usually run $450 - $600 dollars depending on the lenses they come with. They both have good ISO ranges (ISO is the sensitivity of the sensor to light) which means you would be able to take long exposures of things like stars or see detail in very dark places.

If those are out of your price range than I would look at used DSLR's like the Nikon D3300 or D3200. They aren't gonna handle low light quite as well as the newer cameras, and high ISO images will be noisier, but they will still easily take long exposures. And really any DSLR made in the last 8 years will be able to take long exposures. If you are trying to take long exposures of things like car trails one of those would work fine. If you are trying to take photos of things like stars I would try to get a newer DSLR.

u/minimalmonochrome · 1 pointr/photography

Thanks for the thoughts MinkOWar! I'm a bit overwhelmed by the options. The more I look the more I think that an optical viewfinder is also a must as this will likely be used in very sunny environments. I wish I could find something just like the Sony Alpha a5000 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HNJWU3G) with one. Considering the Olympus OM-D E-M10 maybe if I can find one? Looks a bit bulkier though, and my bigger issue then is how to pick an intro lens with it?

EDIT:

Maybe the Canon EOS Rebel T6 Digital SLR Camera Kit (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B01CO2JPYS) would be a decent choice? Don't love the look of it but that's getting picky.

u/zsaile · 1 pointr/Nikon

Or the t6 for 470 Canon EOS Rebel T6 Digital SLR Camera Kit with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens (Black) https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B01CO2JPYS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_0P5nyb60ZYRM7

so many choices.

Edit: bought this one

u/NotSpiderman · 1 pointr/ft86

Lot of good info in this thread but the main thing about hobby photography is that the lens is FAR more import than the camera itself. You just need to find something in your budget that is at least a DSLR that can shoot manually and has the right resolution you're looking for (the older/cheaper ones won't have a super hi-res image sensor or anything like that).

But the lens is what makes most of the difference. Telephoto lenses are pretty common for shooting exterior shots but can be more expensive. Whereas lenses with short focal lengths and wide angles can be used for close up or interior shots. Something like this would be my suggestion for someone starting out, since it has a lenses with a nice variety of focal lengths to choose from. Or like someone else in the thread suggested, look at your local camera and pawn shops for something used.

Also try to take some photography lessons or watch videos on youtube because just having a good camera won't automatically make your pictures turn out better. In fact, they'll likely be worse than your phone's photos if you don't know what you're doing.

u/clickity_click_click · 1 pointr/photography

This should get you started. The canon equivalent is here which will also work quite well. If you want you can add the 50mm f1.8 for either system which will give you beautiful portraits. Don't get your hopes up about indoor action though. Nothing in your price range is going to excel at that. I should note that lenses, and not cameras, are the biggest deciding factor in the quality of the results you will get.

u/Jenaxu · 1 pointr/AskPhotography

It's the one in this kit, 75-300 non USM. I think it's around $90-100, but I can't find the specific link atm.

u/Zerg3rr · 1 pointr/DSLR

You can easily see most of the differences between the two here! http://www.imaging-resource.com/cameras/canon/t6i/vs/canon/t6/

As for the costs, there are several different lenses it could come with but I'll assume that this is the one you're looking at - https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01CQJHJ2E/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1478815625&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=t6&dpPl=1&dpID=41LwLwxCUcL&ref=plSrch&th=1&psc=1 , I tend to use Amazon as an average price, and where I buy a lot of my items myself. I'd say the 450 price point is definitely decent then if it's the same items!

You (or she) will definitely come to realize there are many different choices that can help achieve many different things (for a lot of different costs!). To start though this is a great bundle, the same I started with actually (albeit older versions). Based off what she wants to eventually do in photography can help a bit with deciding what to buy and help you focus in on one path or another. Hopefully this helps a bit!

u/flaz · 1 pointr/photography

I imagine r/AskPhotography/ is probably a better place for this question. There are dozens of good directions to take in terms of recommended gear for beginners. Water restistance and durability usually cost quite a bit of money when dealing with DSLRs, and so I don't have any recommendations for those, other than maybe storing the gear in a pelican or skb case?

My short recommendation would be this Canon T6 kit at amazon for $450. You'll still need a some sort of memory card reader and small-ish card for about $20 more. You'll use the 18-55mm lens for normal shooting, and the 75-300mm for zooming out to wildlife.

u/nx6 · 1 pointr/Cameras

If You're trying to keep costs low then staying with Nikon and the lenses you have would be best I would think (not sure how many you have). But if you're leaning towards video then you might want to focus on Canon more. The Rebel T7i has their Dual-Pixel AF system (first time in a body at this price level I think I heard). Amazon has it with the kit lens for $800.

Edit: The 70D was the first body to have it, if you're looking at used gear.

u/BornAfternoon · 1 pointr/canon

Here is the link: https://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-REBEL-EF-S-18-55/dp/B06VT2NQD8

​

You can get more Discount deals at r/DSLRdeals

u/Slavper8r · 1 pointr/photography

The SL2 is currently $700 on amazon, so about $150 above what this camera will sell for

u/DesigN3rd · 1 pointr/Cameras

I took a couple of film classes in college but didn't end up minoring in photography since I didn't have the money for a DSLR at the time. I still have the Canon K2 body but am wanting to get a DSLR body that will work with the EOS lenses I already have. My question is whether or not a refurbished camera is going to be a good body. I'm trying to bring in some freelance design work to get the money for the DSLR and am trying to get an idea of what I'll need to spend. This one is Amazon renewed, should it be a good deal or should I look at brand new? Canon EOS Rebel T6 Digital SLR Camera Kit with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 is II Lens, Built-in WiFi and NFC - Black (Renewed) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XNTPN8C/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_gz6NDbS5VKKC2

u/opoponits · 1 pointr/photography

Hello,

I teach photography in a middle school I'm looking to upgrade our equipment. This means buying 15 or so sweet new cameras, but there are budget concerns. I'm looking for cameras with manual exposure settings that are easily accessible. Max budget per camera is probably $250, so I know that rules out most DSLRs. A DSLR would be great but a fixed lens situation would also be fine as long as it has good manual functionality. This is the one I was looking at but it may be Juuuuuuust out of our budget. Any recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks!

u/errandum · 1 pointr/Cameras

I'd go with https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Rebel-DSLR-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B071K62DPN

The canon sl2. I own a sony, but sony is a lot more expensive than canon and you can get some good second hand lenses for cheap. With your budget you can get that and a nifty fifty (50mm lens, killer for portraits) and be done with almost everything you need with an averagely good image quality and probably the best autofocus for video you can get in a camera.

Sony is good, but more expensive. If you think you'll be able to gather a bit more money, the 6300 is where you should be, probably. The 6000 is not bad either, but the lenses will cost you a bit more.

Good shooting!

u/gullphoto · 1 pointr/Photography_Gear

This one right here: https://www.amazon.com/EOS-Rebel-T6-Digital-18-55mm/dp/B06XNTPN8C/ref=sr_1_2?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1511203001&sr=1-2&keywords=canon+rebel

It's an introductory model to SLR photography. You're not going to look hip wielding it but it is 90% of what any other SLR is, including high end pro models. If you ever feel limited by this camera then the student will have become the master and you'll know exactly what to get as an upgrade.

u/SmallYTChannelBot · 1 pointr/SmallYTChannel

Thank you for submitting to /r/SmallYTChannel. You have spent 3λ to submit here, making your current balance 11λ.
/u/ajt208, please comment !givelambda to the most helpful advice you are given. You
will be rewarded 1λ if you do so. For more information, read the FAQ.



Video data:


Field|Data
:-|:-
Title|GIGAMAX YAKISOBA | We eat 2136 CALORIES of SPICY goodness
Thumbnail|Link
Views|12
Length|10:15
Likes/Dislikes|2/0
Comments|1
Description|Yuki and I eat an entire 2136 calorie box of the new and spicy GIGAMAX Japanese Yakisoba. I usually don't eat instant yakisoba anymore, but this new giant spicy box was calling out to me, so I went for it. ⤶We also discuss the difference between Japanese noodles in America and Japan, and give a couple tips for making these noodles, and any other instant noodles really, some more flavor. ⤶Making the cooking scene was a blast in this one. ⤶Oh, and this one is in English... ごめんね!⤶⤶My Camera: https://amzn.to/2IAUCzx ⤶Closeup lens: https://amzn.to/2Kl3zAv ⤶Wide Angle lens: https://amzn.to/2IMUH3w ⤶Closeup, wider angle lens: https://amzn.to/2FeJGXN ⤶Joby GorillaPod: https://amzn.to/2RkLzXs ⤶Deity Mic: https://amzn.to/2FiG5rK⤶⤶カメラ:https://amzn.to/2FfMKTv ⤶50mm: https://amzn.to/2Ko7Jro ⤶10-18mm: https://amzn.to/2Kllqr2 ⤶24mm: https://amzn.to/2Ff64Ae ⤶Joby三脚: https://amzn.to/2Ikryh0 ⤶Deity Mic: https://amzn.to/2XsRJKE⤶⤶Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tokini_andy ⤶Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ToKiniAndy ⤶Twitter: https://twitter.com/tokini_andy⤶Website: http://www.tokiniandy.com/⤶⤶#JapaneseFood

Channel Data:


Field|Data
:-|:-
Name|ToKini Andy
Thumbnail|Link
Subscribers|81
Videos|14
Views|2970



^/u/SmallYTChannelBot ^made ^by ^/u/jwnskanzkwk. ^PM ^for ^bug ^reports. ^For ^more ^information, ^read ^the ^FAQ.

u/dzetcor · 1 pointr/videography

If you've invested in Canon lenses, maybe the Canon SL2 will be a nice upgrade for you especially coming from 600D. It can shoot shoot full HD 1080p at 60FPS. Its small, lightweight and has Fast & Accurate Dual Pixel auto focus. Here's a sample video shot from Canon SL2/200D with some slowmo shot in 60FPS. And unlike the Sony A6000, you can use an external microphone to capture better audio.

u/Cike176 · 0 pointsr/Filmmakers

Camera: canon t6 refurbished $350
audio: rode ntg2, an xlr cable, cheap boom pole
You can get the mic used for about $200, spend another $200 for a tascam dr-60

A 5 in 1 reflector kit from neewer for another $20

A few clamp lights and 3200/5600k bulbs


An okay tripod for now

And a cheap shoulder rig

That all should come out to around $1000 and should definitely be enough to get you started. Some of the stuff is a bit cheaper and you’ll need to replace as you move on and understand your needs better but there’s not much quality equipment to be bought if you need a whole package for around $1000

u/tstepanski · 0 pointsr/photography

First tip. Skip the P&S, get a DSLR ESPECIALLY for birds. $300 is a lot of money in high school, in photography, it's half-a-flash. There's a lot of budget photographers on here and I'm sort of one myself, that being said, $300 isn't going to carry you very far. Best bet? Buy a used Rebel T1i or newer or even better, a 30D or newer if you can. You're looking at about $260-$360 for a body, which isn't bad at all. Modern bodies start at about 600-700 and go as high as 6700 or more. I'm at this less than a year and I already need to upgrade from a 50D to a 6D (1700-1800) for what I want to do. Lenses are freaking expensive. My first car out of high school cost me $2200, my next lens (which I'm settling for) is half that. Birding lenses are expensive, because they need to be fast focusing, fast aperture, and long. Really long. My focal length in my bag tops out at 300mm (480mm equivalent), you'll need longer. That being said, you can pick up a 75-300 f/4-f/5.6 with an ultrasonic motor for 230 brand new or the 55-250 with the same aperture with image stabilization for 300 which has a much cleaner MTF chart. If you want fast autofocus, you'd want the cheaper one, but for better contrast quality and IS, go a little more. The 75-300, however, will carry forward to much nicer cameras.


The advantage to saving and buying better is that you'll have nicer pictures, a better experience, more room to grow as a photographer, as well as equipment that will last. P&S's are disposable cameras. They get old and become irrelavent, so do SLR's to an extent, but people still buy old ones for a reason. Old SLR's still outperform P&S's and the lenses give you flexibility. Work, save, strive and then invest. One day, you'll be saving up for a 1D with 100-400mm L-series while sporting a Manfrotto tripod. Give it time.

u/patrophoto · 0 pointsr/photography

forgot to add, what're you using now?

maybe a 7d ii? it's a crop but has decent low light, good autofocus, and good weathersealing
new 1500
used 1100

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Mark-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B00NEWZDRG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1474601271&sr=8-2&keywords=7d+ii


you can try to find a used 5d iii around $1500 these days

https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Full-HD-Digital-Camera/dp/B007FGYZFI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1474601317&sr=8-2&keywords=5d+iii


if you're rich get a 1dx haha, maybe a 1d iii?

for nikon no clue.. but i might go nikon if i started over haha

u/techkid2000 · -1 pointsr/videography

maybe you would want to look into the [Canon EOS 5D Mark III] (https://www.amazon.com/Canon-Frame-Digital-Camera-24-105mm/dp/B007FGZ1V0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1481426674&sr=1-3&keywords=Canon+5D+Mark+III&linkCode=ll1&tag=vidred-20&linkId=eea0a4e661f2ba22cbba7946bad3cdf0) seen as one of the best camera under 4000 and is highly rated by numerous sites, 4.8 ranked on amazon. looking into its display and recording its really good. [youtube review video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2oCMAnkNZg) specs:
22MP full frame CMOS sensor,
6 frames per second continuous shooting,
61-point AF system,
ISO 100 - 25600 range with 50 - 102,800 expansion,
1080p HD video recording with manual controls,
3.2 inch LCD with 1,040,000 dots.

u/NickMomot · -1 pointsr/videography

Hey, I took a quick look at that video and it doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to match that style of production. It looks like he might be using two cameras to film (one wide shot for him speaking to the camera, one lowered and tighter shot focused on the action on the table) but you could replicate this by using one camera with a zoom lens and a tripod that tilts down.

Affiliate links below

As for budget camera that fits this niche, I would recommend getting a refurbished Canon 80D (https://amzn.to/2EiB0OP). There's nothing flashy about this camera but it is very user friendly and offers a lot of good video features in an affordable body. It's over your $700 camera budget but not by far. If that budget is a hard limit then I would recommend going down to the Canon SL2 (https://amzn.to/2ElJ40Z) which offers similar features but generally lower quality and one area that it really lacks compared to the 80D is the autofocus.

For both of these you would want to upgrade out of the kit lens to something that opens to a wider aperture because the style you are emulating uses a lot of out of focus elements. I would suggest eventually going to the Sigma 18-35 1.8 (https://amzn.to/2SyGZE6) but try to find a used one because buying used lenses is a great way to save money.

For lighting, I recommend just getting one good light to start, a reflector/bounce board kit and watching some tutorials. You can do a lot with 1 light and a good understanding of the basics.

Something like this for the light: (https://amzn.to/2SyGZE6)
Cheap light stand: (https://amzn.to/2H7nnoy)
Reflector kit: (https://amzn.to/2Syi6si)

So all in to start you would be looking at about $1100-1200 and if you want to upgrade down the road the best place to do that would be in high quality lenses

u/rampollo · -3 pointsr/gtamarketplace

Cheaper new idiot. You fail try again. People are delusional when selling shit second hand.